On 20-11-2012 6:54, PathScale wrote:
> I'm not soliciting legal advise and this is generally the wrong place to
> ask/debate such questions. I strongly recommend you consult one of the many
> professional and or pro bono legal resources available to open source
> projects.
I think this actually
Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's the
preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
_
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's the
preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal mail
michael.vancann...@wisa.be wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's
the preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD.
Thanks Michael. Minimal research also
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
> > Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's the
> > preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
>
> I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD.
Pierre does OpenBSD and NetBSD, and the level should
Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's the
preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
I think Marco mainly uses FreeBSD.
Pierre does OpenBSD and NetBSD, and
On 2012-11-21 12:27, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's the
> preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
>
I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 for some CGI apps of mine, and it works without
hassle.
Regards,
- Graeme -
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2012-11-21 12:27, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Somebody's suggesting we ought to be at least looking at BSD. What's the
preferred variant from FPC/Lazarus's POV: OpenBSD, FreeBSD etc.?
I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 for some CGI apps of mine, and it works without
hassle.
Tha
Lets say I am using some string variables, but I want to ensure that there
are no typing errors in some code I am using.
so I define newString as a new string type and declare a variable as
ANewString.
That way if I create a function such as functionUsingNewString(a:
newString) and I pass a plain
Once upon a time, on 11/21/2012 08:37 PM to be precise, Frank Church said:
> Lets say I am using some string variables, but I want to ensure that
> there are no typing errors in some code I am using.
> so I define newString as a new string type and declare a variable as
> ANewString.
>
> That way i
Yes.
type newString = type string;
Any function that accepts newString as a parameter will cause a compilation
error if you try to pass a normal string. You'll have to cast it to
newString first.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Frank Church wrote:
> Lets say I am using some string variables,
On 21/11/12 7:49, Kenneth Cochran wrote:
Yes.
type newString = type string;
Any function that accepts newString as a parameter will cause a
compilation error if you try to pass a normal string. You'll have to
cast it to newString first.
This is not the case, as the following program demonstra
Is there some runtime variable informs whether a program is running in a
debugger or contains debugging information?
--
Frank Church
===
http://devblog.brahmancreations.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Hello,
We have placed the first release-candidate of the Free Pascal Compiler
version 2.6.2 on our ftp-servers.
You can help improve the upcoming 2.6.2 release by downloading and
testing this release. If you want you can report what you have done here:
http://wiki.free
On 2012-11-21 19:49, Kenneth Cochran wrote:
>
> Any function that accepts newString as a parameter will cause a compilation
> error if you try to pass a normal string. You'll have to cast it to
> newString first.
That is an incorrect assumptions. The compiler will happily accept both
types witho
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
wrote:
>
> That is an incorrect assumptions. The compiler will happily accept both
> types without needing typecasting.
I stand corrected. I assumed it behaved the same as Delphi in this respect.
It doesn't, not even when Delphi mode is enabled.
16 matches
Mail list logo