Thanks to all for tips. They are very helpfull. I'll test it, wait for
feedback :)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 11 Apr 2014 21:39, "Mark Morgan Lloyd" <
markmll.fpc-pas...@telemetry.co.uk> wrote:
>
> waldo kitty wrote:
>>
>> On 4/11/2014 3:06 PM, Krzysztof wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does FPC have some file watching solution? I need this only for linux.
>>> I need notifications:
>>> - File/folder changed /
2014-04-11 17:40 GMT-03:00 silvioprog :
> See: http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/articles/dirwatch/dirwatch.pdf
>
With sources and demos: http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/articles/
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc
See: http://www.freepascal.org/~michael/articles/dirwatch/dirwatch.pdf
--
Silvio Clécio
My public projects - github.com/silvioprog
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pasca
waldo kitty wrote:
On 4/11/2014 3:06 PM, Krzysztof wrote:
Hi,
Does FPC have some file watching solution? I need this only for linux.
I need notifications:
- File/folder changed / removed / added in watched directory. I have
idea how to do this in thread loop but maybe FPC has OS solution
i'm
On 11 Apr 2014 20:07, "Krzysztof" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does FPC have some file watching solution? I need this only for linux.
> I need notifications:
> - File/folder changed / removed / added in watched directory. I have
> idea how to do this in thread loop but maybe FPC has OS solution
You can use
waldo kitty wrote:
On 4/11/2014 5:03 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The main point is that in FPC you can install a memory manager that
wipes out
any memory when getting or releasing it, if you want to make your
software more
secure that way.
how would one go about doing this? i learned in m
Michael Van
Canneyt<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org&q=from:%22Michael+Van+Canneyt%22>
Fri, 11 Apr 2014 06:01:08
-0700<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org&q=date:20140411>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
On 4/11/2014 3:06 PM, Krzysztof wrote:
Hi,
Does FPC have some file watching solution? I need this only for linux.
I need notifications:
- File/folder changed / removed / added in watched directory. I have
idea how to do this in thread loop but maybe FPC has OS solution
i'm interested in this,
Hi,
Στις 11/4/2014 4:00 μμ, ο/η Michael Van Canneyt έγραψε:
I've just committed support for SSL in the ssockets unit of FPC.
I also made the OpenSSL unit more thread-safe.
I would like to invite people to test and report if they find problems
or missing features.
the "Writeln(pchar(@buffer)
Hi,
Does FPC have some file watching solution? I need this only for linux.
I need notifications:
- File/folder changed / removed / added in watched directory. I have
idea how to do this in thread loop but maybe FPC has OS solution
Regards
___
fpc-pascal
On 4/11/2014 4:10 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Using a memory manager would reliably wipe strings etc. when reallocated (i.e
rather than when an assignment didn't trigger reallocation). On the other hand
it would have the overhead of also overwriting blocks that the user knew were
being freed and
On 4/11/2014 5:03 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The main point is that in FPC you can install a memory manager that wipes out
any memory when getting or releasing it, if you want to make your software more
secure that way.
how would one go about doing this? i learned in my TP3/6 days to use fi
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 11/04/2014 15:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
One consequence of this is that the fphttpclient unit now has support
for the https:// protocol.
I have tested on windows and unix, the support for client-side SSL
support works.
I would like to
On 11/04/2014 15:00, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> One consequence of this is that the fphttpclient unit now has support
> for the https:// protocol.
> I have tested on windows and unix, the support for client-side SSL
> support works.
>
> I would like to invite people to test and report if they f
Hello,
I've just committed support for SSL in the ssockets unit of FPC.
I also made the OpenSSL unit more thread-safe.
One consequence of this is that the fphttpclient unit now has support
for the https:// protocol.
I have tested on windows and unix, the support for client-side SSL support
wo
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 11 Apr 2014, at 10:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
OTOH, I think people are hugely exaggerating the problem, considering it was
introduced relatively recently and that I got my security update before it hit
the newspapers.
That is of course not
On 11 Apr 2014, at 10:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> OTOH, I think people are hugely exaggerating the problem, considering it was
> introduced relatively recently and that I got my security update before it
> hit the newspapers.
The exploit code was also on github before news about the bug h
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is
extended it might result in its existing content being released to the
heap?
If so, is it possible t
On 11 Apr 2014, at 10:10, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Jonas Maebe wrote:
>> On 11 Apr 2014, at 09:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
>>> Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is
>>> extended it might result in its existing content being released to the heap?
>>>
>>> If so,
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is
extended it might result in its existing content being released to the
heap?
If so, is it possible to ensure that this is zeroed or randomised
first,
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 11 Apr 2014, at 09:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is extended
it might result in its existing content being released to the heap?
If so, is it possible to ensure that this is zeroed or randomised first,
wit
On 11 Apr 2014, at 09:36, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is extended
> it might result in its existing content being released to the heap?
>
> If so, is it possible to ensure that this is zeroed or randomised first,
> without having
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is extended
it might result in its existing content being released to the heap?
If so, is it possible to ensure that this is zeroed or randomised first,
without having to do it ma
Is my understanding correct that when a string or a dynamic array is
extended it might result in its existing content being released to the heap?
If so, is it possible to ensure that this is zeroed or randomised first,
without having to do it manually?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. teleme
25 matches
Mail list logo
