Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I think that conventional wisdom is that if somebody's written numerical
analysis code you don't change it gratuitously, since any alterations
will change rounding errors etc. For some reason, that seems to apply
particularly to FORTRAN programs :-)
The reason being
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Except that when you're calling into a DLL (.so on Linux etc.) I don't
think you have much chance of seeing the inside of the library code.
On Mac OS X, which is actually a BSD UNIX, I debug plug-in code all the time.
Not an issue at all.
Regards,
Adriaan van Os
On 18/11/17 21:15, pasc...@piments.com wrote:
On 18/11/17 20:27, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> because the program is
being viewed critically by the ALGOL programmer > whose code
Algol, one my all time favourite languages.
while wendif fi
why is this not universally adopted?
I still
On 18/11/17 20:27, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
because the program is being viewed critically by the ALGOL programmer
whose code
Algol, one my all time favourite languages.
while wend
if fi
why is this not universally adopted?
I still comment my C code with fi's and wend's to keep
On 18/11/17 20:14, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I think that conventional wisdom is that if somebody's written numerical
analysis code you don't change it gratuitously, since any alterations
will change rounding errors etc. For some reason, that seems to apply
particularly to FORTRAN programs :-)
On 18/11/17 19:30, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2017-11-18 15:44, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:> How should one do this?>
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/rtl/system/seekeof.html>
implies that it's only for text files, Seek(f, FileSize(f)) seems
excessive.
Just curious, why would you
On 18/11/17 19:45, Bo Berglund wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:06:25 +, Mark Morgan
Lloyd wrote:
I find myself wondering, in part due to conversations elsewhere: can the >Lazarus
IDE do anything at all sane with a FORTRAN routine called from >Pascal?
In
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 17:06:25 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
>I find myself wondering, in part due to conversations elsewhere: can the
>Lazarus IDE do anything at all sane with a FORTRAN routine called from
>Pascal?
In the D7 application written in
On 2017-11-18 15:44, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
How should one do this?
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/rtl/system/seekeof.html
implies that it's only for text files, Seek(f, FileSize(f)) seems excessive.
Just curious, why would you consider the "old technology" instead of
using
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I find myself wondering, in part due to conversations elsewhere: can the
Lazarus IDE do anything at all sane with a FORTRAN routine called from
Pascal?
It's not different from a call to C or any other compiled language. And with regard to debugging, I
think it will
On 18/11/17 16:45, Adriaan van Os wrote:
Bo Berglund wrote:
I would very much want to convert them into DLL:s programmed in
Pascal> instead so they can be maintained for new Windows versions
(and use 64> bit for example).
Well, you would have to do that by hand. And you need sufficient
Bo Berglund wrote:
I would very much want to convert them into DLL:s programmed in Pascal
instead so they can be maintained for new Windows versions (and use 64
bit for example).
Well, you would have to do that by hand. And you need sufficient understanding of Fortran to know
what you are
How should one do this?
https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/current/rtl/system/seekeof.html
implies that it's only for text files, Seek(f, FileSize(f)) seems excessive.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or
13 matches
Mail list logo