Hi Anthony,
Can you put the link up to the source code please?
Rgds, Darius
Sent from my iPhone
> On 16 Oct 2021, at 00:27, Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal
> wrote:
>
>
> I've been working on writing Pascal bindings a friendly object orient
> interface to a few open source projects. I have
On 10/15/2021 3:16 PM, Ched via fpc-pascal wrote:
Well, well, understand.
OTOH, declaring a string of length 1 is sort of futile -- it uses
two bytes where a plain char declaration takes just one byte.
Not so futile as a string can be empty, not a char !
Well, if you don't like it being ca
I often use squares / cubes and such like:
X := X * X * X;
When I am unsure how much steep of a curve I want. I just add / remove X
and run the test to see if the curve looks good. It's just a preference
thing and considering the other processing intensive stuff going on, I am
sure it doesn't mak
>
> I have writen my own fairly extensive game engine and this will be
> integrated into it sometime soon. My thought was it would be more useful to
> create a minimal version first that other people could evaluate and test
> more easily.
___
fpc-pascal m
> Fade := Fade * Fade * Fade * Fade * Fade;
Why not Fade:=sqr(sqr(Fade))*fade ?
Cheers, Anthony, Ched
Le 15.10.21 à 22:18, Anthony Walter via fpc-pascal a écrit :
I've been working on writing Pascal bindings a friendly object orient interface to a few open source
projects. I have put toget
I would be helpful if you could meld this work into other Pascal-based efforts,
such as the Castle Game Engine. I don't know the details of CGE but if it could
use more of this type of functionality, why not make your work even more useful
by connecting up with CGE?
Doug C.
On Fri,
I've been working on writing Pascal bindings a friendly object orient
interface to a few open source projects. I have put together Chipmunk2D,
NanoVG, MiniMP3, and SDL2 for rendering nice real time platform independent
programs where fast logic can be easily controlled with physics or fast
graphics
Well, well, understand.
OTOH, declaring a string of length 1 is sort of futile -- it uses
two bytes where a plain char declaration takes just one byte.
Not so futile as a string can be empty, not a char !
Regards, Dennis, Ched'
___
fpc-pascal mailli
Hi,
Silly question: Were all compiled an executed in the same computer
and operating system? Also, were all compilations done with same
optimization configuration?
It is well known that different CPUs have differences in some
operations, specially DIV ones that even introduced bugs in the past
(
Hello All,
In https://wiki.freepascal.org/Variables_and_Data_Types about Strings:
// where: 1 < length <= 255
is to read as
// where: 1 <= length <= 255
isn't it ?
Cheers, Ched
Le 15.10.21 à 18:44, James Richters via fpc-pascal a écrit :
The difference is because of the way floating point
The difference is because of the way floating point math works.. and how
rounding works.
Rounding something that ends with 5 is ambiguous, because it could round up, or
it could round down...
You can control the behavior of rounding with SetRoundMode();
See https://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/r
Hi All,
I got different results with 32bit vs. 64bit, 3.2.2 vs. 3.3.1, FPC vs.
Delphi. Why?
var
d1,d2:Double;
begin
d1:=20.5;
d2:=1.05;
Writeln(RoundTo(d1*d2,-2));
Writeln(SimpleRoundTo(d1*d2));
d1:=28.9;
Writeln;
Writeln(RoundTo(d1*d2,-2));
Writeln(SimpleRoundTo(d1*d2));
12 matches
Mail list logo
