2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>> >
>> > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2007/1/25, Felipe Mo
2007/1/26, Carlo Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
2007/1/25, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> 2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, I understand that, but
2007/1/25, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 1/25/07, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I understand that, but I *need* a scripting engine which is based
> on Pascal. And ROPS is the only one I found that answered my
> requirements. Also
2007/1/25, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 25 jan 2007, at 14:44, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Are there plans to set the param-stack the same order as Delphi or
> will the actual code always stay like that?
There are plans to change it to be Delphi compatible.
> (I as
in FPC; but it does
not give me the required stability to get a final patch to any
problems.)
Best regards.
2007/1/23, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/1/23, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Daniël Mantione schrieb:
> >
> > Op Tue, 23 Jan 2007
2007/1/23, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniël Mantione schrieb:
>
> Op Tue, 23 Jan 2007, schreef Alexandre Leclerc:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I saw some time ago in a roadmap for the next version (1.2?) - that I
>> can't find anymore - a poi
erent from
FPC and Delphi and I was waiting that it is /final/ in FPC so that
ROPS would work ok, or at least fix the thing /finally/ so that it
then works for ever with FPC.)
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-p
2006/11/1, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 01 Nov 2006, at 21:43, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Binary search is complex because I have difficulties to get a FPC
> revision that will be able to compile latest Lazarus version...
> (unless I do not need to recompile my Laz each
2006/11/1, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
At 21:43 1-11-2006, you wrote:
>2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>> >
>> > For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
>> > th
orks great. (Is it the
default mode or do we have to specify the -Xi switch?)
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2006/11/1, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb:
>
> For now, the only thing I'm sure about is that with version 2.0.4 of
> the compiler it is working correctly with ROPS for this problem.
>
Can't you try the binary search to find the r
2006/10/31, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> >
I all,
when using -Xe option DBG is working, but when using -Xi it is not. Is
it normal? (Using an old 3823 revision.)
I tried r4479 (v2.0.4) and v2.0.4 FPC version but -Xe is not an
available switch. And debuger is not working without it. Is there
anything to do with that?
--
Alexandre
2006/11/1, Tomas Hajny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> - Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
>>
>> Is there documentation where I could get this information? I thin
2006/11/1, Tomas Hajny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 01 Nov 2006, at 14:30, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
>> - Can you find out how FPC expects string/interface/variant results ?
>>
>> Is there documentation where I could get this information? I thin
? And Methods
parameter passing?
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest
> compiler
> in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok?
> Using
t. Everytime update svn with "svn up -r " to update to the
revision to test.
Ok, ok, I know what you guys mean now... Yeah, this is the 'QuickSort'
algo (how I use to call it) and I'm using this technique too. I did
not know what was 'binary search'. :)
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not
>working well.. this was an old bug... parameter order or I don't know
>what...
>
>Anyone has any clue for me?
That are 1300+ revisions. Try doing a binary search. That will take 11 tests.
meter order or I don't know
what...
Anyone has any clue for me?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
e
info there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_address
But all this is good for private networks only.
Hope this helps;
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/m
quite high requirements on sockets interface and the
thread implementation.
I don't know yet; I don't know this technology. The PocketPC OS
(WinCE?) for now, and maybe the PalmOS on ARM. But this is all to be
seen. For Now I think it will be PocketPC since it
Thank you Felipe;
does someone know if Indy port to FPC would work on ARM? (On their
site it says there has been some succes with WinCE... but asside that
'some' succes on 'wince' is not very clear.)
2006/10/3, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On
Hi all,
I see FPC can compile for PocketPC?
Can it compile on other devices? (i feel ms is not the only player in
the arena...)
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman
There was no problems with ReadLn... after 2 hours of debugging I put
my finger on the problem; somewhere else in the software.
Sorry for that.
Regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http
ch the
list... I added 'Message' in the subject because the mailling list
tought it was a command to execute!?!)
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
eed. Pick the one(s) that fit your needs.
See http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/DCPcrypt as given by Vincent.
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
work on FPC. See
http://www.efg2.com/Lab/Library/Delphi/MathFunctions/Cryptography.htm
for many of them.
I used that one http://www.cityinthesky.co.uk/cryptography.html in a
project once, but it was under Delphi. It should work under FPC I
think... It's up to you to try.
Regards.
--
Alex
It looks like a very nice job. I like the auto-size for translation. I
wish you success in this project. :) It might become the default
widgetset of lazarus one day :)
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
2006/8/8, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The actual procedure that is called. It does some asm processing and
then calls the MyAllMethodsHandler2 that works with parameters. Maybe
this is there that there is a problem? (This is all in the
uPSRuntime.pas file)
For the records, iss
ed and
works, but ugly
end;
-- unit3 -
ADescendantClass1 = TDescendantClass1;
ADescendantClass2 = TDescendantClass2;
procedure Form1.TryAccessProtected(AnObject: TMyClass);
begin
AnObject.InternalSetFlag(true); // not allowed
TDescendantClass1(AnObject).InternalSe
// EDX, ECX = param1 and param2
// STACK = param3... paramcount
asm
push 0
push ecx
push edx
mov edx, esp
add edx, 16 // was 12
pop ecx
call MyAllMethodsHandler2
pop ecx
mov edx, [esp]
add esp, eax
mov [esp], edx
mov eax, ecx
end;
2006/8/8, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTEC
e
begin
{$IFNDEF PS_NOINT64}
if res^.FType.BaseType <> btS64 then
{$ENDIF}
CopyArrayContents(Pointer(Longint(Stack)-8),
@PPSVariantData(res)^.Data, 1, Res^.FType);
end;
end;
DestroyHeapVariant(res);
end;
//...
--
2006/8/8, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 08 Aug 2006, at 20:39, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
>
> > *Problem*
> > I'm exporting some classes (originally a TBitmap; now a custom class)
> > to the ROPS engi
2006/8/8, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 08 Aug 2006, at 20:39, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> *Problem*
> I'm exporting some classes (originally a TBitmap; now a custom class)
> to the ROPS engine and then interacting with the class in the
> scripting engine. Every
iled in delphi mode in there units. My
application is pure fpc. I'm under winXP.
I'm still doing many other tests meanwhile.
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
xcept that it isn't very much like either one, or
anything else. It is either the best language available to the art
today, or it isn't.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.
Actually we have in a class the possibility to:
class procedure MyProc;
class function MyFunc: Integer;
Then we could very simply have:
parallel procedure ParallelBlock;
parallel function ParallelFunction; //if this can happen...
Also, I read that in example 1: "Variables declared here should hav
tribution of
> Win32 version with install.bat script asking you
Since linux people didn't get it to make a common gui, a gui installer
isn't doable.
There is autopackage.org which is a very nice piece of work... but al
c/c++ centric.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
e an unit to be used; not language
implementation. (In that unit you could have ugly compiler magic if
you want, but at least, when using this technology, it would be much
more like using a standard class or set of procedures.)
Any-way; Reagards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
-threaded programming in
FPC?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
arus; but I remember there was only one
commit at that moment of the day 2006/06/08)
On 2006/06/28 the debuger was not working at all. Today 2006/07/13,
only break points.
Regards..
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.fre
his on all breakpoints, but F9 resume the program
execution without a problem.
Any solution?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2006/7/13, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 13 jul 2006, at 16:49, Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> n the following structure I made two Makefile.fpc:
>
> ./Makefile.fpc
> ./bin/Makefile.fpc
>
> Code of ./Makefile.fpc:
> [target]
> dirs=bin
>
> [rules]
> cl
ssing separator. Stop.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
e the procedure into a function.
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
2006/7/12, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 7/12/06, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Delphi a class is always treated as a 'var' when passed in a
> function since a class is a pointer to actual data;
No, not really. It is always p
pts have the parameter 'out' instead of 'var
Longind: Longint' this would avoid another hint about the variable not
initialized (it is useless to init the var since this is out only)...
unless 'out' does not allow 'nil&#x
But this is ok, I'll work the FPC way. I'm not sure this (FPC) will
change anyway :)
Thank you.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
of FPC because it is consistent, but is it
really a copy a of class?!?. Since my background, I'll have to check
all my functions that have classes in parameters to make sure this is
working as expected.
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fp
in FPC? I should restate: What is the design reason for this
decision/behaviour? Is it the way 'pascal object' is supposed to
behave?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
se SetName of TControl
then I'll specifically invoke it. Normally the local variable should
have priority.
Is it a feature of FPC? :) Or should there be a bug filling on that
specific issue?
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist
et uset to look at whatever the second
If you are using Mozilla Firefox, do the following...
View -> Page Style -> Nav-Left
This will move the menu's to the left. I am no graphics artist, but I
think it looks better on the right.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
_
2006/6/28, Rodrigo Palhano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What website are you talking about ?
:)
http://www.freepascal.org/
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listin
s.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>
>
>
Indeed, kudos to the people that made it.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
--
Alexandre Leclerc
__
Thank you Vincent!
2006/5/15, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when doing a 'make install' of a fresh fpc, how do change the
> destination directory? (Instead of c:\pp I would like, for exmaple,
> c:\lazarus\pp
make insta
?
Regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
bit before the
week-end. mov: http://www.firefoxflicks.com/flick/?id=19542 google
video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8762512180812934446
Regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
e huge returns from the gov. because of free foundations.
This is only a theory.
Regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
iew on the interresting point you have
raised. (Still, I totally agree with you, except that language is also
important. It will make the difference between two candidates with the
same "software design / abstraction" skills and personality in the
team.
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Lecle
ould be nice
to have an open source project doing this in fact :) )
Best regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 3/20/06, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> > On 3/20/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 20 Mar 2006, at 21:46, constantijnw wrote:
> >>
> >>>>> Thanks, but I can't reach this
oad by the webbrowser is a pain. I tought it was the server of
freepascal, not really my connection...
I don't know why.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
know (that I should) so that I should absolutely refrain from
using fpc/lazarus? Is it stability? Is it usability? What is it?
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
and save the include files if code has been changed
in them.
The functionality would be fantastic!
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
all in 'includes' files and
> > so on.
>
> Includefiles are not evil. Sure Delphi doesn't use them much, but that
> doesn't mean there is something wrong with them when somewhat properly used.
Indeed, and they are probably most required because of all the GUI and
OS
On 3/16/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> > On 3/16/06, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>How can you check Delphi's source for cleanness ? It is not available,
> >>except for a few m
On 3/16/06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way to simplify that and still be multi-platform very
> > easely? Indeed, that is very much hard to track down the units. (I
terface, etc. Only from the point of vien of
the developper and the toolkit to develop. (Just try to go down the
roots of a simple TButton... you quickly fall in 'includes' files and
so on.
Sorry for the confusion.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
_
ed, that is very much hard to track down the units. (In
comparison, Delphi is cleaner, but it is not as multi-platform /
multi-GUI as laz is.)
Regards.
--
Alexandre Leclerc
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepa
71 matches
Mail list logo
