A concrete example.
A Linux/FreeBSD fpc release was compiled using the pascal headers for
libX11.so.6 and using symlink libX11.so >> libX11.so.6.0.8.
This release was installed on a system (with libX11-dev too to make it work).
If, some time later, a system-update was done to the brand new vers
> Exactly, and it is why, for each fpc version, the appropriate symlink should
> be assigned ( at the moment libX11.so.6 )
And this is the OS, with his updates, that will assign symlink libX11.so.6 to
the last installed libX11.6.1.2.3.4.so
Fre;D
__
>> You have a opinion that every respect, me first.
> It's simply how it is and has been for the past 60 years or so.
Ha, ok, with this argument, I stop to try to change things.
Sorry for the noise.
Fre;D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.f
Please Sven, keep cool.
You have a opinion that every respect, me first.
But maybe it could be interesting to listen to other, even if you think that
those people are stupid.
> The *-dev packages also contain the symbolic link from the library without
> version to the versioned one.
IMHO,
Hello Martin.
Description of libx11-dev package (in /DEBIAN/control).
Package: libx11-dev
...
Description:
This package contains the development headers for the library found in libx11-6.
Non-developers likely have little use for this package.
...
Afaik, fpc does not use the C headers (I did no
Hello Tim.
OK, many thanks for your light.
Fre;D
De : fpc-pascal-boun...@lists.freepascal.org
de la part de Tim Veldhuizen
Envoyé : samedi 11 février 2017 06:04
À : fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Objet : Re: [fpc-pascal] uses myunit in '../src/myunit.pas' ?
Unit names are considered to
Hello.
Is it possible to do a web-streaming-server with fphttpserver ?
If yes, are there examples ?
If no, what are the steps to realize it?
In a loop, a buffer of float is filled at each loop.
What must be done for:
- Prepare the server to welcome that buffer.
- On each loop, copy the buffer t
Hello.
Thanks Graeme for your clear explanations.
sak (Speaker Assitive Kit) is working for LCL, fpGUI and MSEgui.
Here demo of sak in action:
https://sites.google.com/site/designerext/test_sak_mse_fred.mp4
ideU is a voice assisted IDE, derived from MSEide.
Binary release for Windows, L
> > Maybe (once again IMO) the only con is that MSEide cannot deal with
> > LCL projects.
>
> Maybe not designing forms visually, but there is no problems in
> compiling LCL based projects with MSEide. In fact, I have done that many
> times before.
Oooops, I did not know that it was possible.
So,
> con of mside why I don't use it:
>
> The behaviour of the cursor on the end of the line. You cannot go behind the
> line as it is usual in almost every other editor.
Huh, what do you mean ?
I do not feel any difference with other editors...
The big plus, IMO, of MSEide is his weight.
: less
> that qualifies as different client software ;) ;) ;)
Thanks Kitty for your light ;-)
I seems that answers sent from hotmail.com gives my full name...
I prefer "fredvs" so I will use only
http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
for answer/create new topic.
Thanks to note it.
Fre;D
> From: paul2...@brenemanlabs.com
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 09:24:29 -0500
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] ideU version 1.0.0.
>
> Thanks for a simple IDE that a beginner can install. I've already
> posted a few links on my pages.
Many thanks ;-)
@ Martin, dont worry, MSEide is clearly mentioned, i
> What component can I use when i only want to play only the specified
> Hz frequency of sound?
Hello and thanks to try uos.
You do not need a special component, there is the procedure =>
uos_AddFilterIn();
Take a look at filterplay.pas example (both for LCL and fpGUI).
But, of course, you may
> I checked... The demos have it, but the actual UOS units don't...
OK, Graeme, you win ;-)
I will update it asap.
Many thanks.
Fre;D
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
> After increasing the memory I'm up and running. Thanks!
Fantastic ;-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> That will be very convenient for setting up quick
> development VM's per project or client.
Thanks Graeme :-)
Huh, you may use it as VM project but as iso-live cdrom/ usb too.
And you may also install it to device, like your main server ;-).
Cheers.
Fre;D
> Well done! I'm glad you finally got it sorted out.
>
> Regards,
> - Graeme -
Thanks Graeme.
After trying many fpc releases, install all FreeBSD distros that exist,
re-compiling fpc, changing the background image of desktop, the battery of the
netbook, my haircut, finally it works ...
Happ
Re-re- hello Pierre,
Aaargh, I have to take a rest...
No, the image is ok, first command use full path to compiler (and message are
not ok) and second command use full path of the symlink to compiler.
So, to resume (and sorry for all this doubts):
Using full path to compiler to run it, like =>
Re-hello Pierre.
Oops, indeed, sorry for previous post, both commands are using full path in
image.
I have to recheck all, clean everything to know what was wrong and where.
Write you later.
Fre;D
___
fpc-p
Hello Pierre and thank to help.
> Did you notice that the date of compilation is also different
> in both cases...
>
> Are you really sure that the symlink points to the same file?
Bien vu ! (well seen).
Indeed. Before to find the "trick", i have installed many different fpc
version, compiled
> All it needs is binutils (and in case of i386 and x86-64 on ELF
> platforms such as FreeBSD, only the binutils linker).
Hello.
I have try with old binutils but same result.
See attachment.
Thanks.
Fre;D
__
> > What libraries are used by fpc to render the output messages?
>
> FPC does not use any library. Which language are you using for the messages?
I use the default language (En).
What i do not understand is that, in console, gcc gives messages ok and fpc
only hexa characters.
> > By the way, d
> Fred, the tiSetFileReadOnly() I sent you the other day already uses
> fpstat() before checking/setting the read-only flag. So you are halfway
> there. ;-)
Yep, many thanks. ;-)
PS: Bart's tip works like lovely charm... =>
function FileIsExecutable(const AFilename: string): boolean;
var
In
Hello.
Here the thing: a open-source program, eSpeak (voice synthezer) uses 2
libraries: espeak-library and portaudio.
In eSpeak source =>
- For the Windows version, the libraries are included in the executable (static
linked).
To do run the program => it is easy => just run the executa
>> Works fine for me if I compile
everything with those parameters
>> (and -trunk) I assume you compiled with
the build.sh and then
>> didn't clean up properly when you started adding
parameters,
>> thus leaving units compiled without the pic params.
Hello.
I have re-created a new fpc.cfg a
Yep, many thanks for the attention you give :
=> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25901
Hum, Marco explained :
>> Works fine for me if I compile
everything with those parameters
>> (and -trunk) I assume you compiled with
the build.sh and then
>> didn't clean up properly when you started
>> Indeed, not all bug reports are followed up within two days...
Yep, i feel better now ;-)
Thanks Jonas.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fre
> It's quite possible that there is nevertheless a bug, but you will have to
> provide the source code required to reproduce it and compilation
> instructions, otherwise there is nothing we can do (as always).
Hum, not too much answer here... ;-(
Re-resumed :
Units/Project => https://github.com/g
> but you will have to provide the source code required to reproduce
> it and compilation instructions, otherwise there is nothing we can do (as
> always).> Jonas
Hum, ok (but you promise not to tell, it is still a secret...) ;-)
The project-units :
>> https://github.com/graemeg/fpGUI/tree/deve
> /usr/bin/ld: /home/fred/mylib/lib/x86_64-linux/thefile.o: réadressage de
> R_X86_64_32S en vertu de « .bss.n_u_$thefile_$$_usedfirstmessage » cannot
> be used when creation of shared object, recompile with -fPIC/home>>
> >/fred/fmylib/lib/x86_64-linux/thefile.o: error adding symbols: Bad value
> (not getting the name thing but wanting to enter into the spirit of the
> things)
PS : Cfr your studies in Poudlard school... :-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepa
> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:43:17 +0100
> From: reinierolislag...@gmail.com
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Library.StringFunction() : PChar => NO
>
> On 15/03/2014 12:21, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> >> I thought that it was men
> I thought that it was mentioned there somewhere already...
> If nit feel free to add it. That's what a wiki is good for afterall. ^^
Done.
=> http://wiki.freepascal.org/shared_library
Many thanks Sven.
___
fp
>I thought that it was mentioned there somewhere already...
> If nit feel
free to add it. That's what a wiki is good for afterall. ^^
Hum, never seen... I will add it ASAP ;-)
> You don't need the MyString variable, you can simply use
> AStringClass.SomeText.
=> OK
> And you should definitel
> Note: if your MyString is valid through the complete lifetime it could
> be used you can also use "Result := PChar(MyString);"
Hum, to be sure that i understand...
type
TStringClass = class(TObject)
Name: AnsiString; does not change
SomeText: AnsiString; / may change..
en
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:11:14 +0100
> From: pascaldra...@googlemail.com
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Library.StringFunction() : PChar => NO
>
> On 14.03.2014 22:07, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > > It's not a problem, as lo
Hello.
Here are some news from the front :
The fpc Library :
TheRevolutionaryLibrary library;
uses
TheBigUnit;
begin
end.
fpc compiler parameter => -fPIC.
=> Windows 32 bit => Compiles and works more than perfect.
=> Windows 64 bit => Compiles and works more than perfect.
=> Linux 32 bit => C
> It's not a problem, as long as you provide an API to dispose the memory
> used by the returned PChar.
> The responsibility of calling this API is delegated
> to the application.
Yep, with pleasure,... but how to provide an API (and what do you mean with
"provide an API to dispose the memory") ?
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:20:46 -0700
> From: leledumbo_c...@yahoo.co.id
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Library.StringFunction() : PChar => NO
>
> > It will be the memory manager of the library who deals with the PChar
> result.
> So difficult for the main appl
Hello great fpc people.
It is about functions dealing with string inside a library...
If i use that kind of function inside the library :
>> InLibStringFunction() : PChar ;
It will be the memory manager of the library who deals with the PChar result.
So difficult for the main application to ma
Hello.
After successfully translate a useful unit into a universal library, i want to
do the same with something bigger.
I have compile that unit into a Windows library.
Perfect, it compile and works.
But when i try to compile it on Linux a get that error message, even if i
compile it with -f
>> I wonder if uos would allow for this use of DSP-Effects:
>>- read a wav file and output it to a new wav file ("playing" it is
not necessary/sensible here)
>>on the fly "insert" a DSP effect (i.e. run the samples through an
effect processor)
>> the parameter(s) of the
>> PS : I will do a wiki for uoslib too.
OK, updated >> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/uos
PS : I think that the code of the examples in /fpc_examples from
>> https://github.com/fredvs/uoslib
are more self-explained...
Thanks.
Fred.
__
> GREAT
> Any documentation to make this usable ?
> -Michael
All the examples have lot of explanations. ;-)
There is also a wiki for uos : >> http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/uos
The only things to change for uoslib are:
In uses section, add uoslib_h in place of uos.
And to
Hello everybody.
I am extremely happy to announce the birth of the universal uos library version
1.0.
uos (United Open-libraries of Sound) unifies the best open-source audio
libraries.
With uos you can:
. Listen to mp3, ogg, wav, flac,... audio files.
. With 16, 32 or float 32 bit resolution.
Hello Jeff.
I will study your code.
Many thanks.
Fred
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>Also note that this is a good approach with respect to
`universiality`, but if you need to...
> Ewald
Thanks Ewald for your useful advices.
Now, a other battle will begin :
Create headers for C, CNet, Basic, Java, ... and translate all the uos Pascal
examples.
But that is not the problem of
>What I have been wondering for some time now (perhaps you wrote it in a
> mail and I missed it): do you use the same memory manager in the library
> and in your test program?
> Ewald
Yeep, Ewald, you are the Winner.
And you impress me a lot with your perspicacity.
The battle has ended, with
>What I have been wondering for some time now (perhaps you wrote it in a
>mail and I missed it): do you use the same memory manager in the library
>and in your test program?
Oops, indeed i forget that point...
The test now are with cmem only in program, not in library.
I will test with cmem into
Hello.
It seams to me that i monopolize the forum here.
Please advice if it borrow you, i will stop directly... ;-)
I still fight with cmem and trust me, it is a hard battle.
Mainly because the debugger gives me very few infos and because, if i do not
use cmem, all examples are working perfectly
>> bt full ?
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x7fffefe02c14 in ?? () from /home/fred/uoslib/src/libuoslib.so
No symbol table info available.
#1 0x0040 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x7fffefe02d0e in ?? () from /home/fred/uoslib/src/libuoslib.so
No symbol table info available
> bt full ?
Yep, thanks Ewald, i will try that. ;-)
> But if you don't have debug info for your library this won't help you much.
Hum, the library is fp, so i can compile with debug option.
But maybe i do not use the good compiler-parameters.
What compiler-parameters will give me the most detai
Hello.
Here news from the front.
The good news. All console and fpGUI programs using cmem are working with the
fp uos library.
There is only problem with LCL widgetset + cmem.
Here the result of debug + bt of a LCL program using cmem (no problem without
cmem) : it does not help me, i do not u
@ Sven and Tomas : many, many thanks for answer.
Ok, i will fight with the code tonight to (try) to understand what is wrong.
Write you later...
PS : Without cmem, the library is working perfectly.
Last night i listen to songs many hours, with lot of DSP applied, changing that
DPS at runtime, p
> Please provide a simple, self contained example that shows this
problem.
>Regards,
>Sven
Hello.
Hum, i have done a simple library, with a thread and a simple program calling
this library.
Not usefully to show it because, both using cmem are working perfectly... ;-)
So the
Hello.
This to note that a fp library does crash the program who call it, if that
program uses cmem.
To reproduce the crash, create a fp library with a thread.
Start the thread via the main program (who uses cmem) and it will crash when
the library reach thread.terminate.
If you use cmem for
>The bad news :
>All programs using LCL (Lazarus widgetset) crash after thread.terminate
>>inside the library...
>I dont know why, it is the same code and the same library.
>Maybe i have to do something but i dont know what.
>Using directly the uos unit, without using the library, is ok for L
>But as TThread is an Object and Objects are implemented on the heap,
I
>suppose that you need synchronized heaps between the library and
the
>main program.
Exactly, that is what i want...
>AFAIK, there is a way to have a library (if written with fpc)
"attach" to the
>ma
Hello everybody.
The question is certainly stupid because i guess it is impossible, but who
knows...
Is is possible for a library to synchronize a procedure form the program who
use that library ?
I guess no but does it exist a "universal" way for a library to sent message to
the program who u
> I don't use Lazarus, i.e. .lpi files are of no use for me. The option
> -fPIC isn't necessary for the Win32 target, i.e. I didn't miss that one
> (but I was aware of it - at least it was well visible unlike the others
> which I had to find by trial and error).
Ok and thanks to note it. Hum, i ha
> It might be better to mention the necessary compiler options (-Mobjfpc
> -Sh) or even better include them directly in the respective sources.
>
> In addition, compiling "uoslib.pas" results in "uoslib.dll", whereas you
> try to load uos.dll from libconsoleplay.pas.
Yep, sorry. But if you compi
Hello.
Here next adventure of uos library...
I have good news for fpc. ;-)
I have try with a "hello world" 32bit library in Windows 7 64bit.
It works, a 32bit program can access a 32bit fpc library.
But i have bad news for me. :-(
I have try with uoslib, and try, and try, changing everything, b
>I have changed all cdecl into stdcall
but without luck...
>Did you change the calling convention for both the import and the
export
> code? (just a sidenote: on Linux you should use cdecl no
matter what ifnt >your library to be used by other languages
and
Hello.
Here next episode of the conversion of a useful unit into a universal library.
In a recent topic i was taking about the total victory of the conversion in
Linux OS.
Now im fighting to do it in Windows.
I have Windows 7-64 bit.
If compiling the library with fpc-64bit, all is working perfect
> So: don't touch it! ;)
>
> Regards,
> Sven
Yep, many thanks for that clear answer.
;-)
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pas
> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 13:08:16 +0100
> From: freepas...@ypa-software.de
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] High() and Low() for empty dynamic arrays
>
> Am 09.02.2014 13:05, schrieb Fred van Stappen:
> > if length(MyArray) > 0 th
Hello everybody.
I have a question (maybe stupid) about dynamic arrays...
Usually, before to close the application, to avoid memory leak, i do :
if length(MyArray) > 0 then
for x := 0 to high(MyArray) do
MyArray[x].Free;
But, if i use :
setlength(MyArray, 0) ;
would it do the same job ?
Hello everybody.
Here next episode of the conversion of a useful fp unit into a universal
library...
After a hard battle, ... i win. But mainly because of the extremely high
quality of fpc. The compiler gives me useful tips to realise that unique
library.
Unique because that dynamic loaded
> Now what I would like in the compiler is a warning: potential memory
> leak at myclass := TMyUnitClass.Create;
>
> ;)
Oops, prior message was cut...
Yep, before to get that sympathetic message, i changed the code, now all the
class.create are done inside the unit used by the library and i wil
> - Here example for function inside a class of myunit:
> >
> > library mylib ;
> >
> > uses
> > myunit;
> >
> > function mylibclassfunction() : integer; cdecl;
> > var
> > myclass : TMyUnitClass; /// class defined in myunit (if can be a
> > variable outside the function)
> >
> > begin
> >
>>(*) Once dynamic runtime packages are supported this might change
though...
>>Regards,
>> Sven
Ok, thanks Sven, that will be the best...
But before the triumph of fp, i will do that universal audio open source
library with fp too...
Many thanks for all of you, fp desi
> If I am correct, the compiler will add the PIC by itself.
> But someone of the compiler team should confirm this...
>
> Michael.
Yep, Michael, many thanks for answer.
Sorry to insist on that, but the size of fp library is very too big vs other
libraries (C for example).
But there are huge a
> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:30:57 +0100
> From: mich...@freepascal.org
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Size of program vs library ?
>
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Here siz
Hello.
Here size of "nude" program and library compiled with fpc 2.7.1.
Why is it a so big size-difference ?
Compiled with => fpc 2.7.1 => linux 64
Compiler parameters : -MObjFPC -Scghi -CX -Os1 -Xs -XX -vewnhi -fPIC
program prognude ;
begin
end.
=> 26.9 k
library libnude ;
begin
end.
=> 196
Yep, a other useful tip :
To avoid future problems, use name mangling :
Like that :
exports
myFunc name 'myFunction' ; ___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-b
Hello everybody.
Here next episode of the conversion of a useful fp unit into a universal
library...
The goal is to make a library from a unit used by programs.
That unit has lot of complicated procedures-functions, inside some home-made
classes, using many dynamic arrays who vary in length and
> From: hinsta...@yandex.ru
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 15:31:00 +0400
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] fp universal library ?
>
>
>
> 02.02.2014, 02:45, "Fred van Stappen" :
> >> > Yep, thanks Michael.
> >>
> > Yep, thanks Michael.
> >
> > Hum, may i export dynamic array ?
>
> No, you'll need to export these as (typed) pointers and a count.
>
> Regards,
> Sven
Re-Argh, ok, (and i understand now why the library-examples are so simple
:-) ).
Many thanks for that brilliant explanations.
Ok, so
> > > On Sat, 1 Feb 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello everybody.
> > > >
> > > > Ok, i jump...
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Stop compil showing error at dot of
> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 17:00:02 +0100
> From: mich...@freepascal.org
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] fp universal library ?
>
>
>
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2014, Fred van Stappen wrote:
>
> > Hello everybody.
> >
> > Ok,
Hello everybody.
Ok, i jump...
I decide to begin the conversion of a unit (wrapper to other libraries + lot of
functions who link those libraries) into a universal fp library.
After Googling a while (and finding very poor doc, only few for Delphi, with
always the hypra-simple same example...),
> You might want to take a look here:
>http://winff.org
Oops, Winff is fp... i did not know that.
So, no excuse, it is possible to do a universal fp library.
@ Leledumdo and Paul => many thanks.
PS : Because of fp, i need to study lot other languages now :-).
Fred
Hello everybody ;-)
I have developed a fp-wrapper, uos, who links to the best audio open-source
libraries:
>> https://github.com/fredvs/uos/
This main fp-wrapper uses other fp-wrappers who link to those audio-libraries.
Those fp-audio-wrappers have much more features than the c original
audio-
> Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 08:53:25 +0100
> From: xhaj...@hajny.biz
> To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Pure FPC ?
>
> On Mon, January 27, 2014 01:38, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> > Ok, i will try to explain better.
> >
> > When you com
Hello Waldo.
Aaargh, there is double-topic, can you look at the twins topic ?
Thanks.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Ok, i will try to explain better.
When you compile fpc, you do > make clean + make all.
Is it possible to configure fpc-compil and disable Delphi compatibility...?
If not possible, no problem, i only want to know :-) .
Fred
__
Re-hum,...
It seams to me that fpc do not need delphi-compatibility to compile himself (or
i miss something).
So it could be possible to compile fpc without any Delphi-compatible module
(Yes/No).
But maybe it does not will change lot of things, only it will make fpc a few
"lighter" (so forget
> What extent of Delphi incompatibility would satisfy you?
>
> {$objfpc}
> has offered 'mild' incompatibility for many years.
> What additional incompatibilities are you looking for?
>
> Howard
Hum, maybe i do not explain good the proposition...
I
do not want a other {$define not Delphi}, i w
Ooops, sorry for 2X same topic...
I used http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/ for first topic it
responds that the message was refused...
So i sent the second one, as usual, with hotmail.com...
Fred
_
Hello.
Does it exist a option to compile fpc without Delphi compatibility ?
If no, what do you think about that ?
I know, it will be lot of work (like create a Delhi_Compatiblizer class...) but
it could be great for people who want a "lighter" compiler...(like me, who have
already done, since
Yep, yep, yep, i get it...
I will (try) to explain the thing...
The error comes mainly because i was focused on SoundTouchDLL.h. (Thanks to
Ludo).
That wrapper is for windows only.
Before to call a DSP-buffer-procedure, you must do :
FHandle := soundtouch_createInstance();
But the result of n
> That routine is defined in SoundTouchDLL.cpp which is the windows dll
> wrapper. Do you have the linux equivalent?
Oops, im full of doubt now...
Do you think the SoundTouchDLL.h wrapper is for Windows only ( and, yes, the
old wrapper uses stdcall (who is windows only)).
And for linux how does
>Ha, then you use/compiled a different version. Since a `extern "C"` preserves
> the symbol name (that is the trick I use to link in a lot of external C++
> code:
>just put extern "C" in front of the symbol). or it could be that I am
>completely
>missing something here. [for example: is the symbo
> Yep, there is a brand new wrapper from trunk :
Of course, all the tests i have done are with that new wrapper...
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/m
> Note one detail: it is declared there as __stdcall, not as __cdecl, so
> perhaps this has something to do with it?
>
> @Fred: Also note that the type HANDLE is defined there as a pointer, so [as a
> sanity test of sorts] sizeof(Handle {in pascal}) should be equal to
> sizeof(HANDLE /*in C/C+
> That routine is defined in SoundTouchDLL.cpp which is the windows dll
> wrapper. Do you have the linux equivalent?
>
> Ludo
PS : For new new arriving : SoundTouchDLL.cpp is part of SoundTouch, a audio
processing library :
>> http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/download.html
@ Ludo :
In /sourc
> I don't know if the Handle type in the header is defined by the C++ compiler
> or by the package itself. Consult their respective documentation for more
> info.
Here declaration of create instance :
// Create a new instance of SoundTouch processor.
SOUNDTOUCHDLL_API HANDLE __cdecl soundtouch_c
> Writeln(sizeof(THandle)); // for console apps
FHandle := soundtouch_createInstance();
writeln(FHandle);
Writeln(sizeof(FHandle));
Gives that result :
10321232
4
> I don't know if the Handle type in the header is defined by the
> C++ compiler or by the package itself.
> Consult their respect
> What is the value of the handle that was returned?
>
> Ludo
Re-hello Ludo.
That code :
if ST_Load('/home/fred/dynlib_vs_windows/libSoundTouch.so') then
writeln('libSoundTouch.so loaded');
if FHandle <> NilHandle then soundtouch_clear(FHandle);
FHandle := soundtouch_createInstance();
> On 01/17/2014 03:55 PM, Fred van Stappen wrote:
> >
> >> > I run nm and find the name of the procedures ( PS : without
> > nm-Ewald's tip, you must be a high soothsayer to find it)
> >> > For example, a C called procedure
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
