, Instance, @CallDesc, Nil);
end;
.
So for an OleVariant instance V the calls
V.SomeMethod
and
DCNA(V, 'Somemethod')
are equivalent. Only that the latter can accept Cyrillic methods now
Max
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 21.06.2013 09:01, Max Vlasov w
identifier other than direct
referencing so instead of
...
OleVariant.SomeMethodMaybeNonLatin...
...
OleVariant.IntermediateAccess('SomeMethodMaybeNonLatin')
Thanks,
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Bart wrote:
>
> I thought that if I had a subclass that inherited form a parentclass,
> and both have a method with the same name (Bar), then the method of
> the subclass hid the method of the parentclass, and you could not call
> inherited Bar in the subclass.
>
.
Max
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> Am 26.03.2013 15:01 schrieb "Max Vlasov" :
>
> That said it mostly depends on how much Microsoft changed their existing
> ARM compiler. If the changes are minimal for the purpose of user space
> applications then
side?
Thanks
Max
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Florian Klämpfl wrote:
> Am 22.12.2010 20:05, schrieb Max Vlasov:
> > If this news is right
> >
> >
> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-21/microsoft-is-said-to-announce-version-of-windows-for-arm-chips-at-ces-sh
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
> On 03/01/2013 09:14 AM, Max Vlasov wrote:
> >
> > The question is what is different in nautilus and midnight commander
> > comparing to fpc directoy-listing functions that allows them to list
> > directories
midnight commander
comparing to fpc directoy-listing functions that allows them to list
directories correctly in the bug's case?
Thanks,
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
>>
>> Ludo, the patch looks very promising, I just found one
>> problem. I have a test fragment in my form (in a simple
>> simplest application)
>>
>> procedure TForm1.FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
>> var
>> a: integer;
>> begin
>> a:=1;
>>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
>
>
> Attached the patch for the stack unwind (without non-stackframe routines).
> Note that all assembler is gone!
>
Ludo, the patch looks very promising, I just found one problem. I have
a test fragment in my form (in a simple simplest appli
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
>
>
> Right. Statistically, the smaller the stack you look at, the less falls
> positives you get.
>
> One reason for false positives is also that local variables aren't
> initialised. Procedures declaring local variables like buf:array [0..100
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
> **
>
> IMO, a big improvement would be to unwind the stack instead of checking
> every value found on the stack. This would avoid false positives caused by
> random data falling in the main address range or by passing function
> addresses as a
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
> **
>
>
> OK compiles now. I tested this with 2 programs but when I include
> uProcMemMon as the first unit in lpr and define -dPROCMEMMON then they both
> crash with a sigsegv. Undefine PROCMEMMON and they run fine. I've
> attached a small
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> Based on this discussion and the following research I made an attempt to
> implement something like this for fpc/lazarus.
>
> The final result are a couple of units and a dialog that allows to see the
> results in any time inside th
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Max Vlasov said:
> > about collecting some statistics.
> >
> > The idea is similar to some disk utilities that collects and sort the
> sizes
> > of directories. You know when e
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Ludo Brands wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> if there's a common ancestor allocating something (let's call it NewBlock()
> and it uses GetMem) and I have many descendants using this method, is there
> a chance to find the "eater" amongst these descendants or massif tool will
>
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> In our previous episode, Max Vlasov said:
> > about collecting some statistics.
> >
> > The idea is similar to some disk utilities that collects and sort the
> sizes
> > of directories. You know when e
Hi,
reading the recent discussion about lazarus memory consumption, I thought
about collecting some statistics.
The idea is similar to some disk utilities that collects and sort the sizes
of directories. You know when every folder on the computer is scanned and
all the resulting paths are sorted b
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Helmut Hartl wrote:
> Am 10.08.11 16:56, schrieb Max Vlasov:
>
> Jonas, I see that you probably have your reasons not to use gdb inside the
>> lazarus, but it was quite decent for me until this strange unavoidable
>> moment :) It still is, ho
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 10 Aug 2011, at 16:12, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
> SIG35 behaves the same. Strangely, I looked in system monitor for gdb
>> command-line, it looked ok
>>
>> /usr/bin/gdb -silent -i mi -nx --eval-command="
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>
> I tried adding
>> --eval-command="handle SIGUSR1 nostop noprint pass"
>>
>
> While this won't solve your problem, as Michael said you should not use
> SIGUSR1 because it's probably already used by the system.
>
>
SIG35 behaves the same. St
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
>
> Can I somehow tell it to
>> ignore some, for example 'SIG35'? I tried to add it to Language exceptions
>> ignore list as 'External: SIG35', 'External:SIG35' (without space), SIG35.
>> Nothing helped.
>>
>
> handle SIG35 nostop noprint pass
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Max Vlasov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to implement linux timer with timer_create and signals, but an
> exception always fired (External:SIGUSR1).
>
Hmm, it seems that it's not a 'wrong' exception, I executed the same program
from con
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 2:04 PM, wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I tried to implement linux timer with timer_create and signals, but an
>> exception always fired (External:SIGUSR1)
>> What can be wrong with the code
Hi,
I tried to implement linux timer with timer_create and signals, but an
exception always fired (External:SIGUSR1).
It was a lcl program, but I narrowed it to a console one.
Here is the lines without extra codes of releasing (the error appears
before),
What can be wrong with the code below?
Tha
o I suppose when you're talking about different jpeg files, there should be
no problem, at least I'm not aware of IJG code to be using global variables
that can be a real tread in this case
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:46 PM, leledumbo wrote:
> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/progsu137.html
>
Thanks, looks like
var
__errno: integer;cvar;
in the interface section helped
Max
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.
Hi,
I'm trying to trick some c-libraries that use errno variable to think
that it's located in my sources (Windows, MingGw compiled libraries).
if I declare
var
___errno: integer;
...
exports
___errno;
end.
I still get error
testproj.lpr(27,1) Error: Undefined symbol: ___errno
if I look insi
Hi,
I faced the same problem as was described here
http://www.hu.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-devel/2008-February/013028.html
and briefly here
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=5942
in my case I have a unit named uDirScan and uDirScanUtils. The latter
appeared inside uses clause of some unit
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 02 Mar 2011, at 09:02, Roland Turcan wrote:
>
> ...
>> p := PByteArray (PtrUInt (@FData.Content[0]) + MOffset);
>> ...
>>
>>
>> But the compiler informs about %subj%.
>>
>> How to get rid of this warning and to make code portable?
>>
>
epascal.org/docs-html/rtl/{unitname}/{functionname}.html<http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/rtl/%7Bunitname%7D/%7Bfunctionname%7D.html>
is standardized?
if the latter, is it possible to download this data from somewhere for
experimenting?
Thanks
Max Vlasov
___
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Andrew Haines wrote:
> On 01/14/11 14:38, Torsten Bonde Christiansen wrote:
> > Hi List.
> >
> > Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy
> > when calling "inherited" on a method?
> >
> > A small example of what i'm trying to achieve be
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen
wrote:
> On 2011-01-14 23:05, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen <
> t...@epidata.dk> wrote:
>
>> Hi List.
>>
>> Is it possible to jump
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Torsten Bonde Christiansen
wrote:
> Hi List.
>
> Is it possible to jump a couple of levels in the inherited hierarchy when
> calling "inherited" on a method?
>
>
Hmm, don't know whether you're the same person or not :), but I replied in a
stackoverflow question th
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 22.12.2010 20:05, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
>> If this news is
>> right...<http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-21/microsoft-is-said-to-announce-version-of-windows-for-arm-chips-at-ces-show.html>
>> Ther
miss something and there are hidden challenges?
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
ethod
modified or not will work for long, won't it? And also, does a general
developer need some special skills/actions currently in order to run your
program on a stock android phone?
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-p
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Snijders <
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/30 Max Vlasov :
> > So, I suppose that implementing closures is not in real plans (it's ok, I
> > can live with that), but what about the second, is it possible?
> >
&
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Vincent Snijders <
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/30 Max Vlasov :
> > Hi,
> >
> > it appears recently several pieces if knowledge came to me, I understood
> how
> > anonymous functions (aka closures) work :) and
m external
code (what's actually closures is about).
So, I suppose that implementing closures is not in real plans (it's ok, I
can live with that), but what about the second, is it possible?
I will glad to hear different opinions from the developers
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 26 Nov 2010, at 10:38, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
> - Is everything is ok with "steps to reproduce" field in fpc bugtracker?
>> It
>> never show at the issue view. Hope it saves and and at least the
>>
Hi,
don't know where is the best place to ask about the bugtracker and mantis.
Please let me know.
I have two questions:
- Is everything is ok with "steps to reproduce" field in fpc bugtracker? It
never show at the issue view. Hope it saves and and at least the developers
are seeing it.
- Google
lists.freepascal.org/msg22483.html.
Can you consider Android as the best mobile platform currently for a pascal
developer?
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:22 PM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> I'm one of those developers who takes hints and warnings seriously and I
>> must say at least once a week it helps me find a bugs even before runn
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 21.11.2010 16:22, Max Vlasov wrote:
>
>> But is it possible to do the same (partially, gradually or in any other
>> way) for the "legacy" code that keeps the interface compatibility with
>> Delphi. Fo
at the implementation details it seems it is safe to
change "var Index" to "out Index" and possibly it is also safe for any
delphi/lazarus code calling this method
I'm sure it is in any way not the first priority task (I can change the
corresponding
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
> On 20.11.2010 10:07, Honza wrote:
>
>> 2010/11/20 Max Vlasov:
>>
>>> FillChar(Section^, Count*ElementSize, 0);
>>> Initialize(TNameValueRec(Section^), Count);
>>>
>>> Is poss
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Honza wrote:
> 2010/11/20 Max Vlasov :
> > FillChar(Section^, Count*ElementSize, 0);
> > Initialize(TNameValueRec(Section^), Count);
> >
> > Is possible for such syntax to be supported? Probably I'm one of those
&g
icket:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=4825&nbn=1
or create a new one?
Thanks in advance,
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt Emson
> wrote:
> > There is little chance that will happen as it assumes Nokia will focus on
> > Meego... Nokia can't focus on a blade of grass on a su
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Max Vlasov wrote:
> > Sven, although I understand what you're talking about, I think this is a
> > case when MS partially learn
nd anyone can change it at least
leaving some code from the past. Knowing the MS attitute toward backward
compatibility in general, invest or not invest in .Net and Silverlight is a
big question.
Max Vlasov
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists
51 matches
Mail list logo
