On 30/07/2015 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:05:03 +0200
From: Michael Schnell
To:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Counting semaphore for free pascal
Message-ID:<55b8eb9f.6060...@lumino.de>
Content-Type: text
Am 30.07.2015 11:29 schrieb "Michael Schnell" :
>
> On 07/30/2015 10:50 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>> CriticalSection and TEvent derive their names from Windows OS calls,
adopted by Delphi and hence by FPC.
>> There is nothing FPC specific about it.
>>
> OK. Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
On 07/30/2015 10:50 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
CriticalSection and TEvent derive their names from Windows OS calls,
adopted by Delphi and hence by FPC.
There is nothing FPC specific about it.
OK. Thanks for the clarification.
I understand that the computer science names ate Mutex and Sema
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/29/2015 01:06 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/29/2015 12:35 PM, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
critical sections are not.
Hmmm I suppose this is "fpc speak".
Thinking about this I feel that "CriticalSection" (the official name of this
function
On 07/29/2015 01:06 PM, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/29/2015 12:35 PM, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
critical sections are not.
Hmmm I suppose this is "fpc speak".
Thinking about this I feel that "CriticalSection" (the official name of
this functionality is Mutex) and "Event" is "fpc speak". "Eve
On 07/29/2015 04:47 PM, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
I see you're using two concepts of synchronization (semaphore and
events) at the same time.
Maybe better to separate them?
It is not clear why use events to limit thread access to service.
There are several implementation details a semaphore ca
On 29/07/2015 15:44, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:10:23 +0200
From: kapibara
To:fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Counting semaphore for free pascal
Message-ID:<55b8b49f.1070...@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=w
On 29/07/2015 15:44, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 15:16:13 +0200
From: Sven Barth
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Counting semaphore for free pascal
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Am 28.07.2015 20:14 schrieb "kapibara" :
>
> Hi there,
>
> A counting, or general, semaphore limits simultaneous access to a
resource according to the number of permits you specify. On the other hand,
a binary semaphore like a critical section limits the access to "one at a
time".
>
> FPC doesn't s
Am 29.07.2015 12:36 schrieb "Serguei TARASSOV" :
>
> Hello,
>
> On 29/07/2015 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
>>
>> A counting, or general, semaphore limits simultaneous access to a
>> resource according to the number of permits you specify. On the other
>> hand, a binary sema
On Tuesday 28 July 2015 20:07:52 kapibara wrote:
>
> FPC doesn't seem to have a general semaphore? I recently attempted to
> implement one, here is the code, plus a working Lazarus demo attached.
MSEgui also has a semaphore implementation, please see sys_sem*() functions in
lib/kernel/windows/mse
On 07/29/2015 01:10 PM, kapibara wrote:
In an application you have N number of threads and they all want to
access a service. Now, for example, only five threads are allowed to
have access at the same time. ..
I suppose that easily can be made by two critical sections.
One is used to protec
Hi all,
@Serguei Thanks for your reply. What you write is probably right, but
let me explain the problem.
In an application you have N number of threads and they all want to
access a service. Now, for example, only five threads are allowed to
have access at the same time. I believe this is a
On 07/29/2015 12:35 PM, Serguei TARASSOV wrote:
In general, semaphores are inter-process but critical sections are not.
Hmmm I suppose this is "fpc speak".
The "really general" term "semaphore" denotes a kind of for
synchronizing means for multiple execution streams, be that Threads or
tasks
Hello,
On 29/07/2015 12:00, fpc-pascal-requ...@lists.freepascal.org wrote:
A counting, or general, semaphore limits simultaneous access to a
resource according to the number of permits you specify. On the other
hand, a binary semaphore like a critical section limits the access to
"one at a time"
15 matches
Mail list logo
