Hello Eduardo,
Friday, January 23, 2009, 1:46:59 PM, you wrote:
>>I'm using FPC 2.2.2 running over WinXP SP2. Are there any technical
>>reasons that expains that a program runs faster using all checks ( I/O,
>>Range, Overflow, Stack and Verify calls ) with optimization level 1
>>and using heaptra
At 01:10 23/01/2009, you wrote:
Hello FPC-Pascal,
I'm using FPC 2.2.2 running over WinXP SP2. Are there any technical
reasons that expains that a program runs faster using all checks ( I/O,
Range, Overflow, Stack and Verify calls ) with optimization level 1
and using heaptrace, than the same one
Hello leledumbo,
Friday, January 23, 2009, 7:55:28 AM, you wrote:
l> Perhaps bugs in the optimizer, I usually get MUCH faster code with
l> optimization. Well... depending on the code. You can try examining the
l> assembler output (-a compiler switch, -alnrt for more informative output).
I had do
Perhaps bugs in the optimizer, I usually get MUCH faster code with
optimization. Well... depending on the code. You can try examining the
assembler output (-a compiler switch, -alnrt for more informative output).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maybe-one-stupid-question-tp
Hello FPC-Pascal,
I'm using FPC 2.2.2 running over WinXP SP2. Are there any technical
reasons that expains that a program runs faster using all checks ( I/O,
Range, Overflow, Stack and Verify calls ) with optimization level 1
and using heaptrace, than the same one compiled without any check,
optim
