microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
This might be, because you compiled it without a libgdb which in turn is
the one who links dynamically to libc. Most FPC applications (if they
don't use threads or a WideString manager)
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:05:55
To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Reply-To: FPC-Pascal users discussions fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: 2.6.0 for Solaris? And other questions [one
resolved]
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven
Am 21.05.2012 14:59, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
On Wed, 9 May 2012 17:40:40 +0200 (CEST) Tomas Hajny wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 16:14, microcode wrote:
Another question is on 2.6.0 on Linux. I cannot run the fp ide because
I ave glibc 2.9. The error message I get says
fp: /lib64/libc.so.6:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:29:28 +0200 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com
wrote:
This might be, because you compiled it without a libgdb which in turn is
the one who links dynamically to libc. Most FPC applications (if they
don't use threads or a WideString manager) don't require libc and thus
I screwed up the quoting here, sorry. Jeff didn't write all below, I think
some of it was Mark.
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:01:43 -0400 Jeff Wormsley wrote:
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Nothing :-) Once you Slack you never go back!
Most of the SPARC systems around here are Debian
Am 09.05.2012 20:19, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware! But
the question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
It's a matter of what the libc version happens to be on the system that
was used to build libgdb, which
microc...@zoho.com wrote:
I screwed up the quoting here, sorry. Jeff didn't write all below, I think
some of it was Mark.
On Wed, 09 May 2012 18:01:43 -0400 Jeff Wormsley wrote:
And what, pray, is wrong with Slackware? :-)
Nothing :-) Once you Slack you never go back!
Most of the SPARC
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 09.05.2012 20:19, schrieb microc...@zoho.com:
There are no binaries provided by my distribution. It's Slackware! But
the question was, was it really necessary to use such a recent glibc?
It's a matter of what the libc version happens to be on the system that
was used to
On Wed, 9 May 2012 18:44:08 +0200 Jonas Maebe wrote:
There is no real Solaris maintainer. Pierre sometimes works on it and I
run nightly Solaris/SPARC regression tests (for as long as I still have
access to a Solaris/SPARC machine), but I definitely do not support the
platform. Solaris/SPARC
On Wed, 9 May 2012 19:02:16 +0200 (CEST) Tomas Hajny wrote:
My point was that there has been no official / dedicated maintainer for
that platform within the core team recently which is the reason why there
are no official builds for Solaris for version 2.6.0. Mark Morgan Lloyd
who already
10 matches
Mail list logo
