On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Marco van de Voort wrote:
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
The necessary code is currently still missing from clocale on unix.
Are the respective identifiers used on Windows platform independent?
Looks totally windows specific to me. Probably that is the
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
Looks totally windows specific to me. Probably that is the reason why
clocale doesn't since you'd need large iso-code to Lcid tables that
unnecessarily increase binary size.
Not necessarily. You could just emulate the windows
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:14, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
In our previous episode, michael.vancann...@wisa.be said:
Looks totally windows specific to me. Probably that is the reason why
clocale doesn't since you'd need large iso-code to Lcid tables that
unnecessarily
Hello,
I found out that the SysLocale is only initialized on Windows. Should it be
used on other OS, or is it a Windows specific variable ?
Thanks,
Ido
LINESIP - Opening the source for communication
http://www.linesip.com
http://www.linesip.co.il
___
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, ik wrote:
Hello,
I found out that the SysLocale is only initialized on Windows. Should it be
used on other OS,
or is it a Windows specific variable ?
Well, the idea is that it is initialized on all OSes,
but currently it is only initialized on Windows.
The
On 20 Feb 11, at 22:25, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, ik wrote:
Hello,
I found out that the SysLocale is only initialized on Windows. Should it be
used on other OS,
or is it a Windows specific variable ?
Well, the idea is that it is initialized on all OSes,
In our previous episode, Tomas Hajny said:
The necessary code is currently still missing from clocale on unix.
Are the respective identifiers used on Windows platform independent?
Looks totally windows specific to me. Probably that is the reason why
clocale doesn't since you'd need large
