2014-02-07 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net:
On 2/6/2014 1:47 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/6/2014 11:04 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
ahh... i see what you are doing... you are passing the pointer to the
whole record instead of just the needed key... hummm... i'll have to
think about that and
On 2/7/2014 4:06 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-02-07 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net
mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net:
[...]
so now i'm a bit confused but it has been a long day... again... :/
This makes sense... at least in your previous version: I guess catnbr is a
string.
2014-02-06 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net:
On 2/5/2014 3:57 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
[...]
Once again I did not test this, but it seems to me that if Compare
returned -1
instead of 0, any duplicate would be inserted after because it would
never be
considered as equal to any
On 2/5/2014 7:48 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/5/2014 5:24 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i'm unsure what to do or how to handle this so that there is a secondary
(sub) sorting order so that the main key is the master sort and then a
secondary key is used when duplicates are allowed...
You put both key
On 2/6/2014 4:23 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Then my trick does not work for you because it hides the fact that the records
are identical.
actually, the problem comes when referencing the IndexOf() the record...
IndexOf(Item) is passed (unmodified) thru a couple of routines to finally end
On 2/6/2014 11:04 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
ahh... i see what you are doing... you are passing the pointer to the
whole record instead of just the needed key... hummm... i'll have to
think about that and how to do it in my app... right now i'm only
passing the necessary key because the record is
On 2/6/2014 1:47 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/6/2014 11:04 AM, waldo kitty wrote:
ahh... i see what you are doing... you are passing the pointer to the
whole record instead of just the needed key... hummm... i'll have to
think about that and how to do it in my app... right now i'm only
passing
2014-02-05 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net:
On 2/4/2014 5:16 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-02-04 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net mailto:
wkitt...@windstream.net:
[...]
i kinda thought about that earlier when i was digging thru the
code... IIRC,
insert was
On 2/5/2014 3:57 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
[...]
Once again I did not test this, but it seems to me that if Compare returned -1
instead of 0, any duplicate would be inserted after because it would never be
considered as equal to any other. But since you still want your collection to be
able
On 2/5/2014 5:24 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i'm unsure what to do or how to handle this so that there is a secondary
(sub) sorting order so that the main key is the master sort and then a
secondary key is used when duplicates are allowed...
You put both key comparisons in the same .Compare
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be inserted in...
the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys are in reverse order from
how they were inserted...
i am overriding MyCollection^.Insert because i have additional tasks that need
to be done at the time
On 2/4/2014 1:40 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be
inserted in... the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys
are in reverse order from how they were inserted...
Sounds like your TSortedCollection.Compare() needs additional
On 2/4/2014 3:28 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/4/2014 1:40 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be
inserted in... the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys
are in reverse order from how they were inserted...
Sounds like your
2014-02-04 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net:
On 2/4/2014 3:28 PM, Jim Leonard wrote:
On 2/4/2014 1:40 PM, waldo kitty wrote:
i have a TSortedCollection that i'm allowing duplicate keys to be
inserted in... the problem that i'm having is that the duplicate keys
are in reverse order from
On 2/4/2014 5:16 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014-02-04 waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net
mailto:wkitt...@windstream.net:
[...]
i kinda thought about that earlier when i was digging thru the code... IIRC,
insert was overridden because there are cases where the existing record
15 matches
Mail list logo
