John Sgammato wrote:
This is insulting.
A typist is not a technical writer, and taking edits from subject
matter experts and dropping them into FrameMaker documents is not
technical writing. You want a stenographer with FrameMaker experience.
You probably *need* a technical writer but don't
Hi All,
This may be one of those 'Well, if I KNEW which menu and function this was -
I'd have already done it myself' questions, but...
Wondering HOW to simply double-space my PDF output doc (from a structured
Frame book) - so that our writers can more easily make mark ups on the
hardcopy. They
If your tags now are single space, and you want double space output,
you need to change the tags. ;- ) Sounds like you want two sets of
templates, one for each spacing, but that means that all your
pagination will also change.
It'd be a lot easier if you just used Acrobat and Reader to cut in
Alas, there is no such thing as a double-spacing control
for PDF. PDF is a final form document format. The relationship
between your FrameMaker document and the resultant PostScript
and PDF files is that of matching the format 1:1 as much as
possible. Your only way to double space is to change
--- Bob Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wondering HOW to simply double-space my PDF output
doc (from a structured
Frame book) - so that our writers can more easily
make mark ups on the
hardcopy. They write - we production wonks put their
stuff into the frame
books. (We like it this way -
Hi, Bob:
The true oracles have spoken and have left you wanting.G
I'm not smart enough to give up, so I'd suggest that if using
the two-template approach in FM doesn't fit your workflow -
and text for hard-copy printing and markup is your primary
requirement - you could consider exporting
I have been writing a number of service manuals for my client. One problem I
have been having is numbering figures sequentially -- some will, some won't.
The command line for autonumbering in the client's template is F:Figure
n+.
For those that do not, I have to force the figure numbering,
As in So easy a Caveman could do it?
I am sure all of us have had the experience of someone totally clueless
thinking all we do is type. Had a gal at one of our square dances from
our church in 1983 tell me that while she is a store clerk, she is going to
become a tech writer, because if you can
Sounds as if it's a legacy document that was never changed to support
the $chapnum and $volnum variables that were introduced in 6.x.
Assuming it's using chapter numbers as part of the numbering scheme,
of course, correct strings would look something like:
F:Figure $chapnumn+.
If you're not
because if you can do it, anyone can do it.
Wow! She thinks highly of you. Perfect dating material.
We told all of the shipping/warehouse people to take the Introduction to
Tech Writing and the Introduction to FrameMaker class at UCSC-Extension
first. Then, if they passed those classes, they
I have had secretaries apply for tech writer openings in my group. Internal
candidates always get phone screening, so I'd have to call them. I always asked
what they felt were their qualifications, and they all responded that they had
good English and were experts with MS Word. They wrote lots
Are there any gotchas with using text insets? For example, can I insert
xrefs so long as all books that use the text inset have the section to which
the text entity references? I assume that I'd need to regenerate to get the
appropriate page number as the page number will vary from book to book.
Are any of the figures inside either another text frame, or a table?
Numbering usually works extremely well, provided all the paragraph tags
are in the same text flow. Either of these instances creates a different
text flow and/or evaluation order of the numbering building blocks
(counters) that
Well, I guess I can kind of see both sides. I've been a tech writer at
my company for a year and a half, and it is frustrating when others
assume that if you can type and spell
(or *not* spell...hey, that's what spell-check is for, right?) then
you're fully qualified to be a tech writer.
But it
Hi Max,
The PTC rep told me today that FM DITA is proprietary and not compatible with
anything else. Is this true? She also told me that the PTC version of DITA is
standard (whatever that means).
One of our divisions in Japan has decided to go with AT. We are leaning toward
structured FM.
Hi Diane,
Thank you for checking with me; your timing could not be better. I am at the
STC Annual Convention in Minneapolis, where I've had an opportunity to peak in
on several DITA presentations and solicit feedback on FrameMaker's DITA
capabilities from a variety of sources.
I won't say
John Sgammato wrote:
> This is insulting.
>
> A typist is not a technical writer, and "taking edits from subject
> matter experts and dropping them into FrameMaker documents" is not
> technical writing. You want a stenographer with FrameMaker experience.
> You probably *need* a technical writer
Hi All,
This may be one of those 'Well, if I KNEW which menu and function this was -
I'd have already done it myself' questions, but...
Wondering HOW to simply double-space my PDF output doc (from a structured
Frame book) - so that our writers can more easily make mark ups on the
hardcopy. They
If your tags now are single space, and you want double space output,
you need to change the tags. ;- ) Sounds like you want two sets of
templates, one for each spacing, but that means that all your
pagination will also change.
It'd be a lot easier if you just used Acrobat and Reader to cut in
Alas, there is no such thing as a double-spacing control
for PDF. PDF is a final form document format. The relationship
between your FrameMaker document and the resultant PostScript
and PDF files is that of matching the format 1:1 as much as
possible. Your only way to "double space" is to change
--- Bob Williams
wrote:
> Wondering HOW to simply double-space my PDF output
> doc (from a structured
> Frame book) - so that our writers can more easily
> make mark ups on the
> hardcopy. They write - we production wonks put their
> stuff into the frame
> books. (We like it this way - less
Hi, Bob:
The true oracles have spoken and have left you wanting.
I'm not smart enough to give up, so I'd suggest that if using
the two-template approach in FM doesn't fit your workflow -
and text for hard-copy printing and markup is your primary
requirement - you could consider exporting the
I have been writing a number of service manuals for my client. One problem I
have been having is numbering figures sequentially -- some will, some won't.
The command line for autonumbering in the client's template is F:Figure <
>.
For those that do not, I have to force the figure
As in "So easy a Caveman could do it"?
I am sure all of us have had the experience of someone totally clueless
thinking all we do is type. Had a gal at one of our square dances from
our church in 1983 tell me that while she is a store clerk, she is going to
become a tech writer, "because if you
Sounds as if it's a legacy document that was never changed to support
the <$chapnum> and <$volnum> variables that were introduced in 6.x.
Assuming it's using chapter numbers as part of the numbering scheme,
of course, correct strings would look something like:
F:Figure <$chapnum>.
If you're
>>"because if you can do it, anyone can do it".
Wow! She thinks highly of you. Perfect dating material.
We told all of the shipping/warehouse people to take the Introduction to
Tech Writing and the Introduction to FrameMaker class at UCSC-Extension
first. Then, if they passed those classes,
I have had secretaries apply for tech writer openings in my group. Internal
candidates always get phone screening, so I'd have to call them. I always asked
what they felt were their qualifications, and they all responded that they had
"good English" and were experts with MS Word. They wrote
Are there any gotchas with using text insets? For example, can I insert
xrefs so long as all books that use the text inset have the section to which
the text entity references? I assume that I'd need to regenerate to get the
appropriate page number as the page number will vary from book to book.
Are any of the figures inside either another text frame, or a table?
Numbering usually works extremely well, provided all the paragraph tags
are in the same text flow. Either of these instances creates a different
text flow and/or evaluation order of the numbering building blocks
(counters) that
Well, I guess I can kind of see both sides. I've been a tech writer at
my company for a year and a half, and it is frustrating when others
assume that if you can type and spell
(or *not* spell..."hey, that's what spell-check is for, right?") then
you're fully qualified to be a tech writer.
But it
Hi Max,
The PTC rep told me today that FM DITA is proprietary and not compatible with
anything else. Is this true? She also told me that the PTC version of DITA is
"standard" (whatever that means).
One of our divisions in Japan has decided to go with AT. We are leaning toward
structured
Hi Diane,
Thank you for checking with me; your timing could not be better. I am at the
STC Annual Convention in Minneapolis, where I've had an opportunity to peak in
on several DITA presentations and solicit feedback on FrameMaker's DITA
capabilities from a variety of sources.
I won't say
32 matches
Mail list logo