Hi,
I too have the same version applications. I tried deselecting the Bookmarks
while saving my Book as PDF it works properly.
You can try again with these settings in the Bookmark Tag:
Unchecked the Generated PDF Book
Empty the list if it is in Include frame
Unchecked the Include Paragraph Tags
Fred Ridder wrote:
I think it would be a great idea if we could treat anchored
frames as embedded objects with similar properties to tables. But I do
think it would want to be implemented for anchored frames generically
rather than just for figures since some documents use anchored frames
(or
Deb,
I'm planning to use Scribus to put together a project portfolio to post
on my website and have in PDF form. I played with it quite a bit while
writing openSUSE Linux Unleashed. It is much more stable than it was a
couple years ago, and should work quite well for brochures and such. It
Yeah, it is so fun to (a) insert a single-celled table previously set up
as a format, (b) import a graphic file or create an anchored frame into
the single para in the cell, and (c) set the anchored frame to At
Insertion Point so you can get the spacing even all around, and then (d)
adjust
Basically they are incompetent with either tool, and your worst case scenario
is that they are hopeless.
This is what expert staff is supposed to do.
I once had an employer comment on a recommendation to switch to structured
Frame, since I was the only expert they had, with ...what do we do
Radha,
You wrote:
FM 7.0 with XP. Acrobat Professional6.0, Distiller6.0
I try to save my FM Book as pdf or print to postscript and then make pdf.
In the pdf settings dialog box, in the 'Bookmarks' tab, I select
'None' for Bookmarks expanded through level' check box. But still it
expands the
Daniel,
1) Is another attribute written instead of the href attribute?
2) Are you sure your r/w rules are being read? It could be a search path
issue. Does your application definition (probably in structapps.fm) specify
a complete pathname for the rules file. (One simple way to verify that the
Hi Framers,
I am trying to find a two-thirds fraction character/symbol for FrameMaker 8.
At the moment I am typing 2/3 but it looks yuk! I have nice fractions for ¼
(Alt+0188) and ½ (Alt+0189) but 2/3 escapes me. Can anyone help?
Thanks
Bill
Kratos Analytical Ltd, Wharfside, Trafford
Melissa Di Natale
Right now in my Frame documents I have no blank pages (I have it set
so
that any empty pages are deleted). But when I convert in Webworks for
online help I'm getting a blank page at the end of every chapter. Does
anybody know how to get rid of this? I'm wondering if it's
Hi Bill
The 2/3 fraction is not part of the standard 8-bit ASCII character set (first
256 characters). However, it is available as Unicode character U+2154 in many
Unicode-enabled fonts, such as the default Arial font that comes with Windows.
I'm not sure how to enter it directly in FM8, but
The way I've been brought up as a Frame user was to avoid overrides
wherever possible. I'm now working with a writer who is much more
liberal about overrides than I am. We currently work only on
unstructured Frame documents; output is PDF (to print from or for use
onscreen). Right now, we're the
Well, I'm with you and your approach simply because it makes it much
easier to work on and to ensure consistency, because only the person
who created them knows what the override is supposed to do.
There's also the possibility that the override will be interpreted
somewhat differently than its
Milan Davidovic wrote:
The way I've been brought up as a Frame user was to avoid overrides
wherever possible. I'm now working with a writer who is much more
liberal about overrides than I am. We currently work only on
unstructured Frame documents; output is PDF (to print from or for use
The only good argument I've seen for overrides as a normal way of
working is to control breaks across frames, columns, and pages, for a
particular round of publication. They can be removed in one operation
by importing a document's formats to itself, and choosing to remove
overrides. Before saving
I think the key to the question is why the other writer is using overrides. We
all know it's pretty much an article of faith that thou shalt not use overrides
for anything other than controlling page breaks, as Peter notes.
So why is the other writer overriding? I can think of three reasons
The way I've been brought up as a Frame user was to avoid overrides
wherever possible. I'm now working with a writer who is much more
liberal about overrides than I am. We currently work only on
unstructured Frame documents; output is PDF (to print from or for use
onscreen). Right now, we're
I convinced them to use Frame. I kinda said, no way in hell am I gonna
recommend Word. My basis was exactly what this group pointed out: they
aren't using the Word capabilities that are required (e.g. styles, etc), so
if I'm gonna train the pm, I might as well train him on Frame. I also scared
him
Deirdre Reagan wrote:
> Does anyone know why FM automatically makes Table captions but not
> Figure captions?
>
You have had your answer elsewhere on this list. But, seriously, why
isn't there a figure object that is similar to a one-celled table, which
is a pain to set up.
The new figure
Responding to Deirdre Reagan's original query, Hedley Finger wrote
(in small part):
> Deirdre Reagan wrote:
> > Does anyone know why FM automatically makes Table captions but not
> > Figure captions?
>
> You have had your answer elsewhere on this list. But, seriously, why
> isn't there a
Hi Deirdre,
I am not sure whether this information will help you out or not
Table Captions comes automatically, since in the Table>table Designer>Title
Position or the Caption (as we r discussing) on the Basic tab it is set as
Above Table/below table. You can set how the Table caption
Hi Framers,
FM 7.0 with XP. Acrobat Professional6.0, Distiller6.0
I try to save my FM Book as pdf or print to postscript and then make pdf.
In the pdf settings dialog box, in the 'Bookmarks' tab, I select 'None' for
Bookmarks expanded through level' check box. But still it expands the bookmarks
Hi,
I too have the same version applications. I tried deselecting the Bookmarks
while saving my Book as PDF it works properly.
You can try again with these settings in the Bookmark Tag:
Unchecked the "Generated PDF Book"
Empty the list if it is in "Include" frame
Unchecked the "Include Paragraph
Fred Ridder wrote:
> I think it would be a great idea if we could treat anchored
> frames as embedded objects with similar properties to tables. But I do
> think it would want to be implemented for anchored frames generically
> rather than just for figures since some documents use anchored frames
I am out of the office until 16-06-2008.
I am on vacation and not available until Monday, 16 June.
(Visiting the island of Brigadoon . . . . . )
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Framers Digest, Vol
32, Issue 12" sent on 6/12/08 3:00:01.
This is the only notification you
Can't say I have. I tried it on my Linux a couple of years ago while
still in its low 0. (which would mean Beta). It was very slow and
rather buggy at that time. I have only heard of it since and the
reputation is getting better. This is one of the applications that I
would very much like to
Deb,
I'm planning to use Scribus to put together a project portfolio to post
on my website and have in PDF form. I played with it quite a bit while
writing "openSUSE Linux Unleashed." It is much more stable than it was a
couple years ago, and should work quite well for brochures and such. It
> Yeah, it is so fun to (a) insert a single-celled table previously set up
> as a format, (b) import a graphic file or create an anchored frame into
> the single para in the cell, and (c) set the anchored frame to At
> Insertion Point so you can get the spacing even all around, and then (d)
>
Basically they are incompetent with either tool, and your worst case scenario
is that they are hopeless.
This is what expert staff is supposed to do.
I once had an employer comment on a recommendation to switch to structured
Frame, since I was the only expert they had, with "...what do we do
Radha,
You wrote:
>FM 7.0 with XP. Acrobat Professional6.0, Distiller6.0
>I try to save my FM Book as pdf or print to postscript and then make pdf.
>In the pdf settings dialog box, in the 'Bookmarks' tab, I select
>'None' for Bookmarks expanded through level' check box. But still it
>expands the
Daniel,
1) Is another attribute written instead of the href attribute?
2) Are you sure your r/w rules are being read? It could be a search path
issue. Does your application definition (probably in structapps.fm) specify
a complete pathname for the rules file. (One simple way to verify that the
Hi Guys,
Right now in my Frame documents I have no blank pages (I have it set so
that any empty pages are deleted). But when I convert in Webworks for
online help I'm getting a blank page at the end of every chapter. Does
anybody know how to get rid of this? I'm wondering if it's because I
have
Melissa Di Natale
> Right now in my Frame documents I have no blank pages (I have it set
so
> that any empty pages are deleted). But when I convert in Webworks for
> online help I'm getting a blank page at the end of every chapter. Does
> anybody know how to get rid of this? I'm wondering if it's
Hi Bill
The 2/3 fraction is not part of the standard 8-bit ASCII character set (first
256 characters). However, it is available as Unicode character U+2154 in many
Unicode-enabled fonts, such as the default Arial font that comes with Windows.
I'm not sure how to enter it directly in FM8, but
The way I've been "brought up" as a Frame user was to avoid overrides
wherever possible. I'm now working with a writer who is much more
liberal about overrides than I am. We currently work only on
unstructured Frame documents; output is PDF (to print from or for use
onscreen). Right now, we're the
Well, I'm with you and your approach simply because it makes it much
easier to work on and to ensure consistency, because only the person
who created them knows what the override is supposed to do.
There's also the possibility that the override will be interpreted
somewhat differently than its
Milan Davidovic wrote:
> The way I've been "brought up" as a Frame user was to avoid overrides
> wherever possible. I'm now working with a writer who is much more
> liberal about overrides than I am. We currently work only on
> unstructured Frame documents; output is PDF (to print from or for use
The only good argument I've seen for overrides as a normal way of
working is to control breaks across frames, columns, and pages, for a
particular round of publication. They can be removed in one operation
by importing a document's formats to itself, and choosing to remove
overrides. Before saving
I think the key to the question is why the other writer is using overrides. We
all know it's pretty much an article of faith that thou shalt not use overrides
for anything other than controlling page breaks, as Peter notes.
So why is the other writer overriding? I can think of three reasons
> The way I've been "brought up" as a Frame user was to avoid overrides
> wherever possible. I'm now working with a writer who is much more
> liberal about overrides than I am. We currently work only on
> unstructured Frame documents; output is PDF (to print from or for use
> onscreen). Right now,
I convinced them to use Frame. I kinda said, "no way in hell" am I gonna
recommend Word. My basis was exactly what this group pointed out: they
aren't using the Word capabilities that are required (e.g. styles, etc), so
if I'm gonna train the pm, I might as well train him on Frame. I also scared
40 matches
Mail list logo
