Hi Alan,
I'm coming into this discussion thread late (been on vacation). Ignore my
comments if I missed a critical step 8-/
All of the numbering and cross-ref steps seem OK ... whatever works for you.
But why not use Conditional text for the temporary footnotes for author use?
Conditional
Hi Alan,
I'm coming into this discussion thread late (been on vacation). Ignore my
comments if I missed a critical step 8-/
All of the numbering and cross-ref steps seem OK ... whatever works for you.
But why not use Conditional text for the temporary footnotes for author use?
Conditional
H'yall,
On 26/05/2012, at 5:14 AM, Stuart Rogers wrote:
>
> I would suggest a refinement. The objective is to have footnote numbers in
> the body text just before the table, which are visible when editing but do
> not take up any space and are invisible when printing. These footnote numbers
On 25/05/2012 12:16 AM, Alan Litchfield wrote:
Hi Dan,
...
I would change things slightly: 1. By formatting the text you said
would be white as red, until proofing stage. Create a paragraph
format and call it TblFtntPara. I would set the text to red, then
change it the size to be 1pt and
H'yall,
On 26/05/2012, at 5:14 AM, Stuart Rogers wrote:
I would suggest a refinement. The objective is to have footnote numbers in
the body text just before the table, which are visible when editing but do
not take up any space and are invisible when printing. These footnote numbers
Hi Dan,
I feel your pain, having been there, done that.
I figure the demand arises because there is a certain, single word processor
that does it that way, albeit that this way is not correct.
Organising the footnote numbering sequence is not much of an issue. This is
part of the numbering
On 25/05/2012 12:16 AM, Alan Litchfield wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
...
> I would change things slightly: 1. By formatting the text you said
> would be white as red, until proofing stage. Create a paragraph
> format and call it TblFtntPara. I would set the text to red, then
> change it the size to be 1pt
Good morning,
I have a book where the powers that be want ALL footnotes to be part of the
same numbering sequence and appear at the bottom of pages... even footnotes
whose references appear in tables. Since by default footnotes within a table
are placed immediately below the table and have
Hi Dan,
I feel your pain, having been there, done that.
I figure the demand arises because there is a certain, single word processor
that does it that way, albeit that this way is not correct.
Organising the footnote numbering sequence is not much of an issue. This is
part of the numbering
Good morning,
I have a book where the powers that be want ALL footnotes to be part of the
same numbering sequence and appear at the bottom of pages... even footnotes
whose references appear in tables. Since by default footnotes within a table
are placed immediately below the table and have
10 matches
Mail list logo