Greg Thompson wrote:
> My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame
> guide I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame.
> Then they want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using
> Frame) and have them look the same way they looked when I cr
Greg Thompson wrote:
My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame
guide I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame.
Then they want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using
Frame) and have them look the same way they looked when I created
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:56:46 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mif2Go rtf output is "editable" but it depends on what that consists of.
>Mif2Go basically strips the automation from the file and puts in manual
>characters.
Not always. Where Word doesn't offer anything close, we do
output the
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:56:46 -0500, wrote:
>Mif2Go rtf output is "editable" but it depends on what that consists of.
>Mif2Go basically strips the automation from the file and puts in manual
>characters.
Not always. Where Word doesn't offer anything close, we do
output the Frame content as pl
the story
behind this and are there plans to resurface the site?
Greg Thompson
__
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Looking for an editable output from Frame 7.2
D
Greg,
Regarding:
>Omsys.com's rtf export filter would do the best job if they want to
use Word because it mimics the tags pretty well.
>As soon as your client actually starts editing, though, they're going
to notice lots of discrepancies in appearance. Might not matter to
them though, if they aren
is the story
behind this and are there plans to resurface the site?
Greg Thompson
__
From:
To:
CC:
Subject: RE: Looking for an editable output from Frame 7.2
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:56:46 -0500
Greg,
Regarding:
>Omsys.com's rtf export filter would do the best job if they want to
use Word because it mimics the tags pretty well.
>As soon as your client actually starts editing, though, they're going
to notice lots of discrepancies in appearance. Might not matter to
them though, if they aren
At 08:49 -0800 9/1/07, Gillian Flato wrote:
>Just make it a PDF and then, in the PDF, click File > Send for Review.
>Acrobat will make the PDF editable.
>
>Caveat: You must possess Acrobat Professional 7.0 or greater. The editor
>just needs the free Adobe Reader.
And Acrobat can handle line and p
At 5:25 PM + 1/9/07, Steve Rickaby wrote:
>At 08:49 -0800 9/1/07, Gillian Flato wrote:
>
>>Just make it a PDF and then, in the PDF, click File > Send for Review.
>>Acrobat will make the PDF editable.
>>
>>Caveat: You must possess Acrobat Professional 7.0 or greater. The editor
>>just needs the
s+gordon.mclean=grahamtechnology.com at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+gordon.mclean=grahamtechnology.com at lists.frameus
ers.com]On Behalf Of Greg Thompson
Sent: 09 January 2007 05:46
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Looking for an editable output from Frame 7.2
Hi:
My curre
At 21:45 -0800 8/1/07, Greg Thompson wrote:
> My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame guide
> I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame. Then they
> want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using Frame) and have
> them look the sam
At 5:25 PM + 1/9/07, Steve Rickaby wrote:
>At 08:49 -0800 9/1/07, Gillian Flato wrote:
>
>>Just make it a PDF and then, in the PDF, click File > Send for Review.
>>Acrobat will make the PDF editable.
>>
>>Caveat: You must possess Acrobat Professional 7.0 or greater. The editor
>>just needs the
Omsys.com's rtf export filter would do the best job if they want to
use Word because it mimics the tags pretty well.
As soon as your client actually starts editing, though, they're going
to notice lots of discrepancies in appearance. Might not matter to
them though, if they aren't going to compare
Omsys.com's rtf export filter would do the best job if they want to
use Word because it mimics the tags pretty well.
As soon as your client actually starts editing, though, they're going
to notice lots of discrepancies in appearance. Might not matter to
them though, if they aren't going to compar
At 08:49 -0800 9/1/07, Gillian Flato wrote:
>Just make it a PDF and then, in the PDF, click File > Send for Review.
>Acrobat will make the PDF editable.
>
>Caveat: You must possess Acrobat Professional 7.0 or greater. The editor
>just needs the free Adobe Reader.
And Acrobat can handle line and p
At 09:45 PM 1/8/2007, Greg Thompson wrote:
My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame guide
I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame. Then they
want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using Frame) and have
them look the same wa
At 09:45 PM 1/8/2007, Greg Thompson wrote:
> My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame guide
> I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame. Then they
> want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using Frame) and have
> them look the s
TED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Rickaby
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:00 AM
To: Greg Thompson
Subject: Re: Looking for an editable output from Frame 7.2
At 21:45 -0800 8/1/07, Greg Thompson wrote:
> My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame
guid
ces+gflato=nanometrics@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+gflato=nanometrics.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Steve Rickaby
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 6:00 AM
To: Greg Thompson
Subject: Re: Looking for an editable output from Frame 7.2
At 21:45 -0800 8/1/07, Greg Thompson wr
EMAIL PROTECTED]
ers.com]On Behalf Of Greg Thompson
Sent: 09 January 2007 05:46
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Looking for an editable output from Frame 7.2
Hi:
My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame
guide
I created for them in a format the
At 21:45 -0800 8/1/07, Greg Thompson wrote:
> My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame guide
> I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame. Then they
> want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using Frame) and have
> them look the sam
I've used Mif2Go to convert FM content to Word RTF at the conclusion
of three contracts...it was a condition I had to meet if I wa nted to
use FM in all-Word departments. In all three instances, the only way
to tell whether they were RTF or FM from a printed page was to see
what file extension was
I've used Mif2Go to convert FM content to Word RTF at the conclusion
of three contracts...it was a condition I had to meet if I wa nted to
use FM in all-Word departments. In all three instances, the only way
to tell whether they were RTF or FM from a printed page was to see
what file extension was
Hi:
My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame guide
I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame. Then they
want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using Frame) and have
them look the same way they looked when I created them in
Hi:
My current client wants me to provide them with output from the Frame guide
I created for them in a format they can edit, not using Frame. Then they
want to be able to re-publish these files (again, not using Frame) and have
them look the same way they looked when I created the
26 matches
Mail list logo
