Another note on server-based data: if you're having to access the server via
VPN, there are faster VPN routers, and tunnels and there are slower ones...so
check that, too.
:-)
Rene Stephenson
Dov Isaacs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Further update ... If you are access data from a server,
I don't have a problem with graphics loading speed. Are you pulling
them down over a network?
--- James Dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
Has anyone noticeably improved the rate at which graphics are
loaded in
Frame while running on a PC when they upgraded their graphics card?
James Dyson wrote:
Has anyone noticeably improved the rate at which graphics are
loaded in Frame while running on a PC when they upgraded
their graphics card? We are considering doing so here, and I
suspect it will make a vast improvement. Our PCs are pretty
current. I don't want to
, 2.39 GHz)
512 MB Ram
Intel(R) 82865G Graphics Controller (isn't this a cheap imbedded
chipset?)
Windows XP
-Original Message-
From: Combs, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 12:12 PM
To: James Dyson; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Frame on PC
Like the others, I don't think adding a graphics card is going to have
any effect.
What you're complaining about / experiencing is the time required for
Frame to render the
--
Art Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... In my opinion, there's nothing in this
Whoops something odd happened there.
What I was trying to say was that
What you're complaining about / experiencing is the time required for
Frame to render the graphic plus any network transport time. Because
it's FM doing the rendering, how much RAM you have on the graphics
card is a
Rendering for the screen is not the bottleneck. Downloading an image
and/or rendering it internally are *far* slower than the on-screen
rendering. A high-powered graphics card only makes an improvement
for things like PhotoShop, 3D rendering applications (e.g. CAD), and
gaming where millions of
James Dyson wrote:
Yes, the graphics are on a server, but we haven't ever
noticed any slow data rates in the past. We can't move the
So you're saying that, on the _same_ PCs with the _same_ graphics
subsystem and memory, the graphics used to load faster? Well, then your
question is answered
, complex FrameMaker documents.
- Dov
-Original Message-
From: Combs, Richard
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:12 AM
To: James Dyson; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Frame on PC = upgrade the Graphics Card?
James Dyson wrote:
Has anyone noticeably improved
)!
- Dov
-Original Message-
From: Dov Isaacs
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 12:51 PM
To: Combs, Richard; James Dyson; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Frame on PC = upgrade the Graphics Card?
My experience is that for FrameMaker, the graphics card
is of relatively
10 matches
Mail list logo
