Re: [Framework-Team] Official submission: PLIP 184, 200, 203 and 204

2007-12-24 Thread Raphael Ritz
Martin Aspeli wrote: [..] Cheers, and merry Christmas :) Thanks for all your contributions and Merry Christmas, Raphael Martin [1] http://dev.plone.org/plone/browser/review/optilude-plipathon-184-200-203-204/REVIEW-NOTES.txt ___ Fr

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: preliminary results for PLIP selection & call for votes!

2007-12-24 Thread Raphael Ritz
Ricardo Newbery wrote: Thanks again Sidnei, [note to framework list: let me know if I should take this discussion off list] No problem with me. You might want to consider cross-posting or moving to plone-devel depending on the audience you want to reach. Just my 2 cents, Raphael __

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: preliminary results for PLIP selection & call for votes!

2007-12-24 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Dec 24, 2007 6:36 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks again Sidnei, > > [note to framework list: let me know if I should take this > discussion off list] > > Maybe I'm missing something but there doesn't seem to be any reason > to return a 404 (Not Found) or 403 (Forbidding)

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: preliminary results for PLIP selection & call for votes!

2007-12-24 Thread Ricardo Newbery
Thanks again Sidnei, [note to framework list: let me know if I should take this discussion off list] Maybe I'm missing something but there doesn't seem to be any reason to return a 404 (Not Found) or 403 (Forbidding) response. Why not just silently discard the offending files, along wi

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: preliminary results for PLIP selection & call for votes!

2007-12-24 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On Dec 24, 2007 1:15 PM, Ricardo Newbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the proposed (unconfirmed) fix for the second bullet (the OS > X resource fork issue)? Here it is, I would be glad if someone can test and confirm this works: """ I've found an article describing a hack using Apache rew

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: preliminary results for PLIP selection & call for votes!

2007-12-24 Thread Ricardo Newbery
On Dec 23, 2007, at 3:14 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote: To be clear, I believe the only -1 vote on #187 was primarily due to some concerns about the shortage of detail in the PLIP text. A concern I share. I'm hoping Sidnei fleshes out the details soon. :-) I would gladly answer any questions

[Framework-Team] Re: Suggestion for adding Usecase information

2007-12-24 Thread Martin Aspeli
Danny Bloemendaal wrote: So what is needed? I think that only an extra header in the boilerplate text for a plip would be enough (and stress that writes fill it in of course). I think this fits well inside the "Motivation" box we already have. What's needed is a framework team that proact

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Suggestion for adding Usecase information

2007-12-24 Thread Danny Bloemendaal
On 24 dec 2007, at 11:24, Martin Aspeli wrote: Danny Bloemendaal wrote: On 24 dec 2007, at 04:27, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Danny Bloemendaal wrote: After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual usecase wa

[Framework-Team] Re: Suggestion for adding Usecase information

2007-12-24 Thread Martin Aspeli
Danny Bloemendaal wrote: On 24 dec 2007, at 04:27, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Danny Bloemendaal wrote: After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual usecase was that it was trying to solve. I would like to su

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Suggestion for adding Usecase information

2007-12-24 Thread Danny Bloemendaal
On 24 dec 2007, at 04:27, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Danny Bloemendaal wrote: After having waded through a big pile of plips I often (as a less technical oriented member) had problems determining what the actual usecase was that it was trying to solve. I would like to suggest (when thechcnical