Hi Folks,
at Wichert's request and in order to update us all
I've just compiled the following overview. I hope
I didn't forget anything. Feel free to comment on
this as you see fit. I've scanned the tracker and
looked again at some of the PLIP pages but I didn't
dig through the mailing list archi
Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... following their notes and the various discussion to come up
> with another opinion, albeit not reviewing things. at least, that's
> what i think makes sense.
Among other suggestions for the process for the next review around: I think
framework t
On Feb 19, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
oops, i only realized raphael had already looked at 212 in the
middle of writing down that list. so actually it should have read
"#187 and #215 need to be reviewed for a second time, and
On Feb 19, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
I have been reviewing last night but only posted my review in the
review notes inside the plip. I was under the assumption that that
was sufficient, sorry for that but I did review them.
no, it's not. as stated here several times before,
I have been reviewing last night but only posted my review in the
review notes inside the plip. I was under the assumption that that was
sufficient, sorry for that but I did review them. I'm now working on
my last one #212. And to be honest, I didn't know that I had to vote
for plips I didn
