Thanks very much for the report Raphael. I'm going to treat this as the
official recommendatation of the framework team.
Some quick comments:
Previously Raphael Ritz wrote:
PLIP #201: Improve the UberSelectionWidget UI
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Previously Raphael Ritz wrote:
PLIP #201: Improve the UberSelectionWidget UI
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7736
Don't know, seems to me this might be deferred to 3.2
It does seem to look good
On Feb 20, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Done. See my recent post to the list earlier today
http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2008-February/001960.html
(I didn't change any ticket status though)
thanks a lot, raphael! much appreciated! :)
andi
--
zeidler it consulting
On 20.02.2008, at 09:35, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Thanks very much for the report Raphael. I'm going to treat this as
the
official recommendatation of the framework team.
and so will i. some of the +3 and +4 would actually need to be
increased by one, namely my own vote, which i chose to
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[..]
PLIP #202: Support inline validation and editing for formlib forms
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/203
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7737
+4 - but there is still some debate about what's the
best way to handle the portal status message. Once this
is
FYI, limi has created a ticket for improving the framework team
process -- but s3kritly, it seems ;-). thanks to raphael for the
pointer, though. perhaps others would like add themselves to the cc:
list:
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7816
cheers,
tom
maybe i didn't understand you correctly, but i was under the
impression that you had additionally suggestded that the inline
validation should als explicitly *clear* and statusmessages. this
would certainly address the issue you're mentioning below... at least
i think so. *scratches head*
Tom Lazar wrote:
Hi Tom,
maybe i didn't understand you correctly, but i was under the
impression that you had additionally suggestded that the inline
validation should als explicitly *clear* and statusmessages. this
would certainly address the issue you're mentioning below... at least
i
On Feb 20, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
FYI, limi has created a ticket for improving the framework team
process -- but s3kritly, it seems ;-).
that's a PSPS focus area ticket, i.e. one of the things identified at
the summit and assigned to be championed by someone, in this case
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
PLIP #216: Template overrides
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/216
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7750
-4 - never submitted
(Raphael notes: not sure we are on trac here as all
this is about is to include the z3c.jbot package from
On 7 Feb 2008, at 02:15, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Graham Perrin wrote:
I'll be more than happy to help with the WebDAV aspect, if required.
any kind of feedback is welcomeFeel free to provide any feedback
you may have on this to the framework team list right away
(included in cc).
On Feb 20, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Hi Folks,
hi raphael,
at Wichert's request and in order to update us all
I've just compiled the following overview.
nice job — thanks again for jumping in!
PLIP #216: Template overrides
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/216
On 20.02.2008, at 16:29, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
FYI, limi has created a ticket for improving the framework team
process -- but s3kritly, it seems ;-).
that's a PSPS focus area ticket, i.e. one of the things identified
at the summit and
The framework team has delivered its verdict so we can proceed with the
move towards Plone 3.1. I've created a new branch of ploneout:
https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/ploneout/branches/3.1 . As of now
everyone should be aware of a few important changes:
1. All changes should be made on the
On Feb 20, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
in short: i like the idea, but i'm -1 on including this _now_.
Note that I said -4 - never submitted.
yes, i know :)
My remark was triggered by looking at
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/216
and realizing
On Feb 20, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
Hi all, sorry for the late reply, had a busy day.
Anyway, thanks again Raphael for your wrap up.
On 20 feb 2008, at 15:48, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Now, a variant that we might want to consider is
only to clear (but not to issue the error
16 matches
Mail list logo
