Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #246 ready for review (pending review notes)

2009-02-15 Thread Raphael Ritz
Graham Perrin wrote: [..] 1. Please, for test purposes, can anyone provide a well populated folder of events? 2. If not Calendaring + p4a.plonecalendar then can we suggest any other route to .ics import? Hi Graham, thanks for testing this. Please note that this PLIP isn't about

[Framework-Team] Plone 3.3 review: the final verdict

2009-02-15 Thread Raphael Ritz
Summary of reviews for Plone 3.3 as of 2009-02-15 = In short: all submitted PLIPs are ready for merging That's really great and once more thanks to all who contributed! Specifically, we were dealing with the following: PLIP 126 - links

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #247 ready for review (I think)

2009-02-15 Thread Israel Saeta Pérez
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Israel Saeta Pérez dukeb...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Ethan Jucovy ethan.juc...@gmail.comwrote: Some of the things that people have said ought to be discussed about PLIP# 247 are: 1) impact on server startup time 2) implications

Re: [Framework-Team] Plone 3.3 review: the final verdict

2009-02-15 Thread Andrew Burkhalter
Can someone refresh my memory as to who is responsible for the merging and by when? I see the following lists 2/14 as the final deadline on the schedule: http://plone.org/support/forums/announcements#nabble-td1490066 Thanks! Andrew On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Raphael Ritz

Re: [Framework-Team] Plone 3.3 review: the final verdict

2009-02-15 Thread Raphael Ritz
Andrew Burkhalter wrote: Can someone refresh my memory as to who is responsible for the merging and by when? As I understand it that's Wichert's job now as he is our release manager. Whether he does all the merging by himself or whether he'll ask authors for help is up to him. Raphael I