On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 17:15, Steve McMahon wrote:
> 1) Should there be a significant new feature release of Plone this
> year? What are its most basic goals? Which framework team is in
> charge?
Hanno already outlined the goals, I'd say go with those.
I'd nominate the incumbent 3.x team for thi
We need to move the Plone 2009 proposal forward (whether it's 3.5 or 4.0).
I'd like to suggest that the combined Plone 3 and 4 framework teams
make the decisions on this.
It looks like me that you have a couple of sets of decisions to make:
1) Should there be a significant new feature release of
Matt Hamilton wrote:
> On 6 May 2009, at 01:44, Ross Patterson wrote:
>> These kind of messages are not largely or exclusively technically,
>> marketing, or user oriented. They require a cohesion of all concerns.
>>
>> Maybe I'm trying to be structural about something that shouldn't be
>> addresse
