Ricardo Newbery a écrit :
>
> On May 12, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
>
>> Ideally, a framework team should have an odd number of members in
>> order to avoid tie votes. However, in watching the last couple of
>> voting sessions for Plone 3, I noticed that there were not that many
>> PL
On May 12, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Ideally, a framework team should have an odd number of members in
order to avoid tie votes. However, in watching the last couple of
voting sessions for Plone 3, I noticed that there were not that many
PLIPS on which every person voted. So, I thi
By my reading, here is the list of those willing to participate in a
Plone 4 framework team:
Raphael R.
Ross P.
Matthew W.
David G.
Calvin H.P.
Alec M.
Erik R,
Laurence R.
That's eight names, and an excellent set of skills for a release
that's not likely to emphasize UI work.
If you'd like your
Jon Stahl wrote:
Eric Steele wrote:
Folks,
A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by
Friday
There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we
pare this down to a list of 7 people?
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael (3), Ross (4),
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael (3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
unavailable: Andi (3)
I'm available. If a million other people want to do it, I'll be
equally happy to bow out and just write a bunch of PLIPs.
Erik
___
Framework-Team mail
Jon Stahl wrote:
> I'd like to gently encourage Hanno to play a formal role on this new
> FWT. As the "Plone trunk/future" release manager and our most prolific
> contributor, I think it will be important for him to provide continuity
> between the Plone 4 release and Plone Future.
I'm happy to s
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Eric Steele wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by Friday
>
> There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we pare
> this down to a list of 7 people?
>
> We currently have responses of:
> availabl
I don't consider it a disaster. To me it's more about the community
learning from mistakes, identifying areas of improvement and getting
better by each release. If we were more happy with Plone 2.5 than 3,
we would have a real problem. :)
Actually, 2.5 had a lot going for it. We still have
