We are agree that include FileSystemStorage and AttachmentField in thecore is not a good idea. We thought to include them in Plone bundle but
the better way is perhaps to put them in Archetypes bundleThat's Nouri's turf, so ask him.
>> It's my feeling that writing and promoting a good how-to on th
Martin Aspeli a écrit :
> Raphael Ritz wrote:
>> Alec Mitchell schrieb:
>>> On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong
layer
to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core.
>>>
>>>
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Alec Mitchell schrieb:
On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong layer
to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core.
+1 to holding off on this (though like limi's, my vote
Alec Mitchell schrieb:
On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
While I think what you are doing is great, it feels like the wrong layer
to solve it at when it comes to embedding something in the core.
+1 to holding off on this (though like limi's, my vote doesn't count
for m
On 9/1/06, Alexander Limi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:52:21 -0700, Encolpe Degoute
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our team wishes to highlight PLIP 154 as we think it is nearly
> implemented by FileSystemStorage + AttachmentField (still SVN).
By the time Plone 3.5 ships, it'
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:52:21 -0700, Encolpe Degoute
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our team wishes to highlight PLIP 154 as we think it is nearly
implemented by FileSystemStorage + AttachmentField (still SVN).
By the time Plone 3.5 ships, it's highly likely that Zope has proper BLOB
support, a
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Thx for these suggestions, as my time is currently a bit limited, I
didn't have time to go through these in detail yet :(
Hanno
-
? PLIP 142 - Componentise the global content menu
? PLIP 173 - OpenID support
This from memory that Hanno knows the insides of PAS, if
Hi all.
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I took a look at the PLIPs still remaining. I put some preliminary
> names to some of PLIPs, purely along the lines that I thought people
> may be interested in. All the ones with "?" in front of them are just
> suggestions - the other ones are the ones
you might announce who is coordinate review on what bundles to plone-dev
and encourage people to sign up.
as a non-voter, I'll volunteer to review 3 bundles. anything but the
wiki bundle. First come first serve. sign me up.
-w
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Helge Tesdal wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20
Helge Tesdal wrote:
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:31:19 +0200, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glad you feel that way, I don't want to be seen to tell people what to
do! Personally, though, I prefer to get a bit of a nudge rather than
have to do all the leg work myself (and I was in need of
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:31:19 +0200, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Glad you feel that way, I don't want to be seen to tell people what to
do! Personally, though, I prefer to get a bit of a nudge rather than
have to do all the leg work myself (and I was in need of a distraction).
N
Rocky Burt wrote:
On Wed, 2006-30-08 at 16:21 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Rocky
-
? PLIP 157 - Content rules engine
? PLIP 118 - Porlets engine basd on PlonePortlets and Viewlets
These are heavily Zope 3 based, and I know Rocky has an enthusiasm for
viewlets :-)
This is fine for me. Than
On Wed, 2006-30-08 at 16:21 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Rocky
> -
> ? PLIP 157 - Content rules engine
> ? PLIP 118 - Porlets engine basd on PlonePortlets and Viewlets
>
> These are heavily Zope 3 based, and I know Rocky has an enthusiasm for
> viewlets :-)
This is fine for me. Thanks Marti
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> ...
> PLIP 179 - Improved commenting infrastructure
>
> There are three plips (120, 124 and 149) which have a CMFPlone but no
> bundle so I'm ignoring those.
>
>
> I think the markup (149) support basically works and is fairly low-risk,
> but it's also primaril
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
PLIP 173 - OpenID support
This one is mine. The current status shows the design nicely but there
are a couple of essential bits (like session authentication) still
missing (they are listed in the docs in the bundle). I expect it to be
ful
15 matches
Mail list logo
