[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

Matthew Wilkes wrote: On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote: In partial answer,

[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

This is actually really bad, and I think it should block the 3.2 full release (i.e. with installers). +1 ___ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On 2009-01-04, Martin Aspeli wrote: > I did try to add Products.NuPlone as an egg manually, but that doesn't > work either, because it has a spurious dependency on Products.CMFPlone. True, although adding it as a source egg (in a pinch) seems to work. > I think we need to: > >1) Get a releas

[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

Martin Aspeli wrote: > Wichert - I'm assuming you've been away for the weekend, but once you > get this, could you at least grant a few people, including me, PyPI > access to Products.NuPlone? We then also need to make the 3.2.1 release > that includes NuPlone ASAP. I just spoke to Wichert. He's o

[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg? Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight? It seems the consensus is that it's an oversight. I tested trunk last night, and it appears to be in a good state. I tried to release it to PyPI, but alas I don'

[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi, Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg? Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight? Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3. This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by adding Products.NuPlone to your eggs. The que

[Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

Martin Aspeli wrote: > Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg? >> >> Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight? > > Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3. > > This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by > addin

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

(ccing wiggy in as a ping as he requested for such issues in #8839) On 4 Jan 2009, at 03:06, Martin Aspeli wrote: This is actually really bad, and I think it should block the 3.2 full release (i.e. with installers). +1 I think we need to: 1) Get a release of Products.NuPlone that works wi

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote: On 2009-01-04, Martin Aspeli wrote: I did try to add Products.NuPlone as an egg manually, but that doesn't work either, because it has a spurious dependency on Produ

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On 04.01.2009, at 04:06, Martin Aspeli wrote: Matthew Wilkes wrote: On 3 Jan 2009, at 07:55, Graham Perrin wrote: In partial answer,

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

> +1. Plone 3 ships with NuPlone in the same way it does with CMFEditions > or any other package, we shouldn't change this in the 3.x series. +1 Nothing should break on a 3.x upgrade unless we've thought it through carefully and intend to break it. On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Hanno Schlicht

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On 13.01.2009, at 00:14, Hanno Schlichting wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: The question now is how we deal with the release. We could: - Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt for the dependency. +1

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

Martin Aspeli wrote: [..] - Add Products.NuPlone as a dependency of the Plone egg. This would mean 'Plone' always comes with NuPlone, but there's no reason overt for the dependency. +1 as I consider this the closed to what we used to do so far. Raphael - Add it to the [versions] block,

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg? Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight? Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3. you got the release year wrong, but that's just a minor detail... apart

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On 1/27/09 1:28 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:01 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg? Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight? Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3. you got the release year wron

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: NuPlone and Plone 3.2

On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: On 1/27/09 1:28 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: apart from that i'm wondering what the status is?! it's been two full weeks since the last post in this thread and 3.2.1 is still not out. is anything blocking this or why does it take that long?