Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[..]
If you draw this up you basically get a matrix of views with a
content-type axis and a tile-type axes. Something like:
| main content | portlet | search result | folderlisting
Raphael Ritz wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[..]
If you draw this up you basically get a matrix of views with a
content-type axis and a tile-type axes. Something like:
| main content | portlet | search result | folderlisting
Martin Aspeli wrote:
[..]
In the spirit of thinking aloud, I think even that is not general
enough. I think the easiest approach will be to use pure Zope 3 and
register these as different views providing different marker interfaces
or something like that. That way, you can tile something
Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
On 08.12.2007, at 16:58, Martin Aspeli wrote:
We already have an RSS portlet in 3.0. Jon's talking about making it
more powerful.
ah, i hadn't realized that there was one already, my bad ;)
We do have one, it just does not work for anonymous users. I fixed
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:45 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
... there's another kind of portlet which we can provide (ship with
or
not, up to you guys) - a referenced content portlet. Here, you
search
(using an UberSelectionWidget) for a Page that's then rendered as
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
... there's another kind of portlet which we can provide (ship with or
not, up to you guys) - a referenced content portlet. Here, you search
(using an UberSelectionWidget) for a Page that's then rendered as
content. We can provide
Martin Aspeli wrote:
i'm also not sure how to treat static portlets conceptually. i.e. as
pages (that just 'happen to be displayed in a column') or as non-
content. this raises further questions, i.e. how to treat their
content when searching a site?
The way plone.portlet.static works
Hi Tom,
i think that the 'referenced content portlet' that you suggest makes
the problem disappear. for most usecases the static portlet in its
current form (i.e. non-content, non-searchable) is a simple solution
that 'just works' (all is missing is the rich text editor which is
being
i'll take a look at the plips and check out their bundles (including
wiggy's #195) during the weekend and will report by sunday evenening.
cheers,
tom
On Dec 3, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi team,
hi martin,
I'm
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
i'll take a look at the plips and check out their bundles (including
wiggy's #195) during the weekend and will report by sunday evenening.
fair enough, but let's make deciding on the acceptance of PLIPs a
higher priority
On Dec 4, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
i'll take a look at the plips and check out their bundles
(including wiggy's #195) during the weekend and will report by
sunday evenening.
fair enough, but let's make
On Dec 2, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi team,
hi martin,
I'm submitting the following PLIPs for Plone 3.1.
thanks for submitting these — unfortunately i won't have time to read
them today, but i'll catch up and comment some time later this week.
having that said, could we,
On Dec 3, 2007 11:20 AM, Andreas Zeidler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in this particular case i'd suggest
the end of the week if that's okay with everyone?
I won't make that, this week is already too full.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing
13 matches
Mail list logo
