Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Now all the remaining test failures are cape used by plone.portlets missing
any standard portlet assignments.
So right now we have no portlets
Yes, this is what I said - we need a migration/GS step to set this up.
showing up and for some reason the management screen
Hello again :)
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>
>>> Right now there are a bunch of test failures which result in
>>> ComponentLookupErrors. These are due to the missing setup of the local
>>> sitemanager in PloneTestCase (setHooks, setSite and friends). If nobody
>>> else has tim
It wasn't just you: the whole world was blacklisted. Certainly stopped a
few spammers :). Martin just posted before I made the change.
Wichert.
Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Good morning :)
>
> After Wichert was so nice to remove me from the spammer blacklist,
> hopefully my reply comes
Good morning :)
After Wichert was so nice to remove me from the spammer blacklist,
hopefully my reply comes through this time. I only wonder why Martin
wasn't blacklisted ;)
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hanno, as always, you're invaluable!
>
>> Right now there are a bunch of test failures which result
Hanno, as always, you're invaluable!
Right now there are a bunch of test failures which result in
ComponentLookupErrors. These are due to the missing setup of the local
sitemanager in PloneTestCase (setHooks, setSite and friends). If nobody
else has time to get those fixed, I'll do that tomorrow
Hi again.
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> If there are no objections I think we should merge these four PLIPs into
> trunk in the next couple of days:
>
> PLIP 8 - Versioning
>
> PLIP 118 - Portlets engine based on PlonePortlets and Viewle
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Aren't we supposed to have an official vote on what PLIP's we think are
ready for inclusion?
We are supposed to decide, I'm not sure if we need to actually vote. I'ld
like to turn this around a little bit: the four PLIPs that are curr
Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Aren't we supposed to have an official vote on what PLIP's we think are
> ready for inclusion?
We are supposed to decide, I'm not sure if we need to actually vote. I'ld
like to turn this around a little bit: the four PLIPs that are currently
ready for merging
Hi.
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> If there are no objections I think we should merge these four PLIPs into
> trunk in the next couple of days:
Aren't we supposed to have an official vote on what PLIP's we think are
ready for inclusion?
In case anybody agrees with me, here are my votes:
> PLIP 8
On Fri, 2006-06-10 at 14:11 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Also - is anyone reviewing the content rules bundle? I want to put
> some more time into that, and harass Markus into doing so as well.
> It's in a similar state to the portlets bundle - needs more
> actions/conditions and UI improvements an
10 matches
Mail list logo
