Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
even though i just spent another two or so hours reading up and
sorting out tickets, this is still valid. i guess the first task is
pretty much done, or at least the status and assignments[1] of all
tickets should reflect the current status. the counting and repor
On Feb 20, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Done. See my recent post to the list earlier today
http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2008-February/001960.html
(I didn't change any ticket status though)
thanks a lot, raphael! much appreciated! :)
andi
--
zeidler it consulting
Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... following their notes and the various discussion to come up
> with another opinion, albeit not reviewing things. at least, that's
> what i think makes sense.
Among other suggestions for the process for the next review around: I think
framework t
On Feb 19, 2008, at 2:36 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
oops, i only realized raphael had already looked at 212 in the
middle of writing down that list. so actually it should have read
"#187 and #215 need to be reviewed for a second time, and
On Feb 19, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
I have been reviewing last night but only posted my review in the
review notes inside the plip. I was under the assumption that that
was sufficient, sorry for that but I did review them.
no, it's not. as stated here several times before,
I have been reviewing last night but only posted my review in the
review notes inside the plip. I was under the assumption that that was
sufficient, sorry for that but I did review them. I'm now working on
my last one #212. And to be honest, I didn't know that I had to vote
for plips I didn
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:50 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
oops, i only realized raphael had already looked at 212 in the
middle of writing down that list. so actually it should have read
"#187 and #215 need to be reviewed for a second time, and #202 and
#212 should probably also see another roun
On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..] i don't think we can leave it at that. imho, _at least_ #187,
#212 and #215 need to be reviewed for a second time, and #202 and
#212 should probably also see another round of click-tests.
oops, i only realized raphael had already loo
On Feb 17, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
judging by andi's summary and the recent reviews we currently have
the following plips that have only one review
thanks tom for putting together that overview. i've made it home a
little bit earlier and decided to double check things while i was
judging by andi's summary and the recent reviews we currently have the
following plips that have only one review (there aren't any left, that
have been submitted and have not been reviewed, so at least we've got
that covered...)
#187: Working Out-of-the-box WebDAV raphae
On Feb 16, 2008, at 1:10 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
1. could someone from the team _please_ step up and go through
the list of PLIPs[1] tomorrow, checking which one have already been
reviewed twice and either close them (in case of no pending issues)
or make sure they're assigned to the r
11 matches
Mail list logo
