Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
this is a fundamental change in how the framework team will operate
from now on. we're no longer just a group of individuals who quietly
need to make some sense of PLIPs and their implementation on their own
but more of a clearing house
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> >From what I understood the reason for the private list was to allow you
> > to discuss individuals without having to worry about being overly
> > political or hurting anyones feelings.
>
> Unfortunately, no-one will be able to address your specific concerns
> wit
Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
> this is a fundamental change in how the framework team will operate
> from now on. we're no longer just a group of individuals who quietly
> need to make some sense of PLIPs and their implementation on their own
> but more of a clearing house.
So, do I understan
On 18 Dec 2008, at 10:34, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Collecting external input and outside reviews is a nice idea, but
things
like user interface and documentation should be a full part of the
process, and therefore should be reflected in the membership of the
group which makes decisions based o
On 18.12.2008, at 11:48, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 12/18/08 11:43 AM, Tom Lazar wrote:
and therefore should be reflected in the membership of the
group which makes decisions based on those factors.
i think that conclusion is the only part where we disagree. can we
agree at least on that? ;
On 12/18/08 11:43 AM, Tom Lazar wrote:
and therefore should be reflected in the membership of the
group which makes decisions based on those factors.
i think that conclusion is the only part where we disagree. can we
agree at least on that? ;-)
Not without a way to guarantee that user interf
On 18.12.2008, at 11:34, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
[...] things
like user interface and documentation should be a full part of the
process,
absolutely
and therefore should be reflected in the membership of the
group which makes decisions based on those factors.
i think that conclusion is the
On 18.12.2008, at 11:21, Martin Aspeli wrote:
In particular, one of the things we'd discussed and would like to see
more of, is a consultative approach where the framework team reviewer
asks for review from people outside the team. Anyone who is motivated
to contribute opinions will be heartily
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Wichert,
>
> I can assure you that UI expertise was a factor in the discussion, as
> was the need for a balanced team. The selection decision that was made
> was unanimous, and followed healthy, constructive debate.
Which makes me all the more baffled that UI exp
