Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Feb 1, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote: On 1. feb.. 2008, at 12.28, Martin Aspeli wrote: Careful with weeding imports. I recently had to fix a migration issue for a customer, where a persistent tool had been moved into another module with an import at the old location. Someone else

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Martijn Pieters
On 1. feb.. 2008, at 12.28, Martin Aspeli wrote: Careful with weeding imports. I recently had to fix a migration issue for a customer, where a persistent tool had been moved into another module with an import at the old location. Someone else then ran pyflakes and removed said import, breaking th

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Feb 1, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: Previously Tom Lazar wrote: given the aforementioned possibility of 3rd party breakage i think it's plain that 'pyflakes sanity' is a no-go for 3.1 but perhaps for 4.0? since that will necessitate 3rd party rewrites/adaptions anyway, might as w

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Tom Lazar wrote: > On 01.02.2008, at 12:07, Andreas Zeidler wrote: > > >On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote: > >>On Feb 1, 2008 11:51 AM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>talking about "weeding out stuff" bring another thing to mind. not > >>>exactly relat

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Tom Lazar wrote: On 01.02.2008, at 12:07, Andreas Zeidler wrote: yes, i'm very much aware of these problems having used pyflakes myself for quite some time now. that's one of the reasons i'm bringing this up here (instead of starting to "weed" away on trunk :)).

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Tom Lazar
On 01.02.2008, at 12:07, Andreas Zeidler wrote: On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote: On Feb 1, 2008 11:51 AM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: talking about "weeding out stuff" bring another thing to mind. not exactly related to translations, but i'll throw it in here

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote: On Feb 1, 2008 11:51 AM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: talking about "weeding out stuff" bring another thing to mind. not exactly related to translations, but i'll throw it in here anyway: tools like pylint[1] and pyflakes[2] have

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Feb 1, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote: [3] which basically means all packages except `statusmessages` (guess who owns that ;)) as you can see from the attached list counting the warnings; i should note that this list still contains warnings about namespace package `__init__.py`

Re: pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Feb 1, 2008 11:51 AM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > talking about "weeding out stuff" bring another thing to mind. not > exactly related to translations, but i'll throw it in here anyway: > tools like pylint[1] and pyflakes[2] have really grown on me ever > since i started using

pyflakes? (was: Re: [Framework-Team] Translation effort for Plone 3.1)

2008-02-01 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Alexander Limi wrote: You probably see where I'm going with this, but: I'd like to ship 3.1 with a set of .po files that do not contain the strings from Plone 2.5. Hanno said it would take him "a couple of hours" to weed out the stuff that is 2.5-specific, and agr