Colleagues,
I need help setting up a blog. I’ve already started, using Wordpress, but I
need someone who knows how to do three things:
1. Optimize its functionality with plugins, including monetary donations. That
means customizing core features of the particular Wordpress theme I’m using
UPCOMING:
*KATHERINE BAUER Teenage Dream Sequence: Seduction of the Eye*
December 15 - January 5
Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your
browserhttp://us2.campaign-archive2.com/?u=3981b3cd5df4fcb9d6f37c2a7id=ccd7af24cde=9cd3fa2e0f
.
*Katherine Bauer*
*Teenage Dream
The problem for the filmmaker in the digital age is that there is absolutely no
standardization between different screening venues. Some folks want files, but
only take certain codecs and containers (and different ones at different
places, of course...). And some folks want physical media:
The problem for the filmmaker in the digital age is that there is absolutely
o no standardization between different screening venues.
But there is standardization between commercial theatres. They _all_ take
DCP files. DCP files are the 35mm of the New Millennium.
Now, there are a lot of
Moira:
There’s HDCAM and there’s HDCAM SR. HDCAM is a terrible format, to be avoided
at all costs. HDCAM SR is ok if you want HD and need tape, but it is fading
quickly in favor of files.
While many are suggesting ProRes (and that should be ProResHQ 442 (I don’t
think you need 444 in this
If you're stuck with Blu-Ray, definitely use
professional optical media. Taiyo Yuden is the
gold standard. They make DVDs under their own
brand as well as others. For Blu-Ray, I think
Taiyo Yuedn have an exclusive with JVC. I go to
supermediastore.com, they have the widest selection of media
I'm looking to buy my first Blu-ray burner. Any suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron F. Ross
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 3:12 PM
To: Experimental Film Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] HD cam 24 vs 25? vs DCP?
If you're stuck with Blu-Ray, definitely use
And as recently noted here, ProRes isn't available on PCs. Given what
production houses charge for transfers, it might behoove PC based folks to
invest in a used older Mac Pro (~$500) if only to make ProRes files.
I've been making ProRes files from a Win platform for ages now, no issues
at all,
INTERESTING
On Dec 13, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Sean M seanmorris...@gmail.com wrote:
And as recently noted here, ProRes isn't available on PCs. Given what
production houses charge for transfers, it might behoove PC based folks to
invest in a used older Mac Pro (~$500) if only to make ProRes
Fascinating, that's great news. Thanks for the info. Cinec Pro is 150
Euro for the noncommercial version, which is about US$200. Cheaper to
go the open source route and deal with the inconvenience. But if you
can deduct the expense from taxes, Cinec Pro might be worthwhile.
/
1. If you're not putting a lot on the computer itself (no big itunes
library, personal photos, etc) 256 is plenty for the operating system and
programs you'll use. However, video editing performance is significantly
better on SSD. It can be convenient to move your project onto the
computer's
i downloaded mountain lion from the app store last week - i would imagine that
it's still there, just took a bit of searching to find it
-lj
On Dec 13, 2013, at 9:14 PM, Chris Freeman christopherbriggsfree...@gmail.com
wrote:
1. If you're not putting a lot on the computer itself (no big
Hi Ken,
Your machine will most likely come with Mavericks installed.
For FCP7 I’d recommend a clean install with Mountain Lion.
Here’s a little how-to :
http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/17/make-bootable-os-x-10-8-mountain-lion-usb-install-drive/
Best,
Gideon
On 13 dec. 2013, at 20:27, Ken Paul
Where are you guys finding Mountain Lion on the App Store? I only see
Mavericks.
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Gideon Kiers wrote:
Hi Ken,
Your machine will most likely come with Mavericks installed.
For FCP7 I’d recommend a clean install with Mountain Lion.
Here’s a little how-to :
14 matches
Mail list logo
