Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-30 Thread Francisco Torres
are less chem. used when porcessing as negaitive? 2016-01-30 7:50 GMT-04:00 Chris G : > Hey Morgan, > > Yes, flashing can compensate for underexposure and lack of shadow details > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flashing_%28cinematography%29 > > There's also a good explanation of the process in the

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-30 Thread Chris G
Hey Morgan, Yes, flashing can compensate for underexposure and lack of shadow details https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flashing_%28cinematography%29 There's also a good explanation of the process in the book Film Technology in Post Production. Might not be worth the effort this time, but something t

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-28 Thread Scott Dorsey
If you want to just process it as negative, follow the directions on the datasheet. It is designed for that and works very well. --scott ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-27 Thread Jason Halprin
Here's a thread from the Film and Darkroom User forum with times/chemistry for processing 7222 as reversal: http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/archive/index.php/t-6026.html -JH Jason Halprin jihalp...@gmail.com ___ FrameWorks mailing list F

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-27 Thread Morgan Hoyle-Combs
Hey Chris,  What do you mean by flashing? Hitting it with light before I develop it? And what's this about using "non diluted stock solution"? What about steps to just processing it as the negative roll?  On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 7:47 AM, Chris G wrote: Hi, D-76 as a reversal dev

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-27 Thread Chris G
Hi, D-76 as a reversal developer for *222 will probably be too low in contrast. One method you may want to look into is using the stock solution (non-diluted) and processing at a higher temperature to yield greater contrast. Generally speaking higher concentrations of B&W developers = more contras

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-26 Thread Jason Halprin
Well, that would mean that you were approx 2 stops underexposed, so you could try for a push-4 in the 1st developer, which is a little off the charts. It might be worth shooting another roll with the same exposures (rate at ISO 200, meter and expose according to the meter), and then test developmen

Re: [Frameworks] Hello - Curious about Double X 7222 reversal

2016-01-26 Thread Jason Halprin
To quote Robert Houlihan from a 2008 post on cinematography.com: "We have run XX22 as reversal before, if run and shot normal (as 200iso) it comes out very dark and muddy, you need to rate it as 50iso and or dump as much light on as possible and run it in the reversal chemistry as a push 2 to get