ll be flipped left to right, and
> emulsion side (it will be A wind not B wind).
>
> Best wishes,
> Robert Withers
> New York City
> withe...@earthlink.net
>
> Re:
> 1. Rephotographing 16mm (Morgan Hoyle-Combs)
> From: Morgan Hoyle-Combs <mhoyleco...@yahoo.com&
Likely you could also just get it contact printed. I think just about every
lab out there would make an internegative from it and then an interpositive
from the interneg but in days gone by it used to be possible to make a
reversal interpositive right off the original. The downside of this is
rr THE WOMAN NEXT
> DOOR (1984, 19 min, video) Joe Gibbons SPYING (1977-78, 31.5 min, Super
> 8mm-to-16mm. Preserved by Bard College with support from the National Film
> Preservation Foundation.) Michel Auder THE CONVERSATION, BROOKLYN (2003, 4
> min, digital) Total running time: ca. 60 min.
>
I often enjoy running film that is too dense through a reducer which is a
chemical that actually pulls out some of the excess silver.
Farmer's reducer was wonderful (two part powder packet) but they don't make
it anymore... I used to have a lot of expired packets... I'm sure there is a
Hello all,
One of my 16mm films came out a little too dense. It was a Double X roll
processed as a reversal but the end result was rather dark. There's still
images but they need to be blown out. Is there a way to rephotograph the roll
to give it more contrast? Could this be done via optical
