Could you please tell me more about your technician and the crystal sync
circuit that he has devised.
Thanks,
Jean-Louis
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 11, 2018, at 5:45 AM, Pip Chodorov wrote:
>
> . Our technician in Paris has made a tiny crystal sync circuit that will fit
> in the camera beh
I got a Wolverine for my filmmaking class in Korea where we shoot and
hand-develop our films. There is one guy making telecines in Seoul by
pointing an HD camera into the gate of a projector, but he would give
us interlaced AVI files. The Wolverine is better. However, the video
quality is not g
This is an old threat, but wanted to mention that in the past year or so
I've actually used the Wolverine film scanner quite a bit.. So felt bad for
panning it so bad a year ago.. It's not perfect, but cheap and probably
better results than the old "off the wall" scheme..
Here's a short "commercia
At L'Abominable in Paris, Nicolas made a film scanner from a projector.
He made a 16mm version and later a super-8 version.
Here is a link to the description:
http://www.filmlabs.org/index.php/technical-tips/telecinema/
___
FrameWorks mailing list
Fram
I found the instructions for older models on the MovieStuff site. Roger Evans
had produced three different lines based on Eiki projector mechanism before
going exclusively to the “made totally from scratch” ‘Retro' units.
The earliest and simplest of these ran at standard projector speed, with
I made a DIY scanner for Cooper Union art School. We use it every day
and it looks great (1080p24 ProRes outputs, enough flexibility to do
color neg without difficulty). It involved a lot of tinkering but the
basic tech is nothing exotic: modified projector, diffused RGB LED
backlight, mirrorless s
I used moviestuff's older projector based line for 8, Super8, & 16 at the
digital transfer lab I used to work at and they worked well except when having
to transfer older, more brittle reels.
Lately Ive just been setting the shutter speed on my camera as low as it can
go, still a bit of flicke
There are a lot of old film-to-video devices out there that produce pretty
rotten looking 480i video with 3:2 pulldown. Some of them are still selling
for good money. We do not live in the 480i world any longer.
There are a number of actually very good looking film-to-video systems that
use modi
There are 16mm versions of the retro scanners Still think 5-10 k is a
good price if the thing works as promised... a big IF
2016-12-01 19:06 GMT-04:00 Dominic Angerame :
> David, did not realize u meant 10 grand. That is an awful lot of money for
> doing S8mm and 8mm, there used to be very ch
David, did not realize u meant 10 grand. That is an awful lot of money for
doing S8mm and 8mm, there used to be very cheap ways of doing transfers by
using a projector. I am sure that David (above) knows more about this than
I.It is just a lot of money.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:36 PM, Dave Tetzl
A while ago I asked here about the Movie Stuff products and did not get any
feedback
2016-11-30 20:35 GMT-04:00 Francisco Torres :
> Yes 10 K US... I was used to rent Ranks for 4-5 K A day! That was mostly
> for commercials so they had money to burn. So 10 k to own anything seems
> very inexp
Yes 10 K US... I was used to rent Ranks for 4-5 K A day! That was mostly
for commercials so they had money to burn. So 10 k to own anything seems
very inexpensive! Especially if it is for a collective .
2016-11-30 1:36 GMT-04:00 Dave Tetzlaff :
> > I wonder if there is any alternative to it at a
> I wonder if there is any alternative to it at a decent price (under 10 K?)
Did you really mean “under $10,000”?
Well, there’s the MovieStuff Retro, $4.500:
http://moviestuff.tv/moviestuff_home.html
Mr. MovieStuff, Roger Evans, used to make film scanners based on projector
mechanisms, probabl
I know there are filmmakers who have cheaply rigged up an Arduino setup for
it..
Also there are good reviews on the Reflecta super 8 scanner.. $1300 from B&H
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Francisco Torres
wrote:
> I wonder if there is any alternative to it at a decent price (under 10 K?)
>
>
I wonder if there is any alternative to it at a decent price (under 10 K?)
2016-11-29 18:08 GMT-04:00 Dan Anderson :
> I bought a Wolverine.. It's easy to use and very handy, but the image
> quality is quite poor. I went in with low expectations based on the reviews
> and was still disappointed.
I bought a Wolverine.. It's easy to use and very handy, but the image
quality is quite poor. I went in with low expectations based on the reviews
and was still disappointed. Lots of digital artifacts. The one saving grace
is that it captures "frame-by-frame" so you don't get a digital blur
between
Here's a review from YouTube:
"Wolverine 8mm and Super 8mm Film 2 Digital MovieMaker - REVIEW and test
footage"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-WN44a0l5g8
--greg
On 11/29/16 11:04 AM, George, Sherman wrote:
I received an ad for a Wolverine Data regular8/super 8 digital film scanner.
Has an
I received an ad for a Wolverine Data regular8/super 8 digital film scanner.
Has anyone used/tested this device and, if so, what was the quality of the
transfer.
At $ 300 it seem like a deal.
Any evaluation would be welcome.
Thanks
Sherman George
sgeo...@ucsd.edu
858-229-4368
18 matches
Mail list logo
