On 08/03/17 14:14, Russell Coker wrote:
> True. I think I've done my share of work in securing Linux systems both
> directly through working on SE Linux and indirectly through finding bugs in
> various daemons and applications (often due to SE Linux policy revealing
> inappropriate things).
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 03:05:00 PM russ...@coker.com.au wrote:
> Jason, your analysis is insightful and well written. But I disagree with
> this
> paragraph. The above article gives a clear example of the problems with
> a "release all information" approach. Releasing government information
>
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 01:46:00 PM Andri Effendi wrote:
> I think people who dismiss Assange or Snowden as "Russian Agent(s)" are
> bonkers and have been manipulated by the MSM.
I have never suggested that Snowden is a Russian agent. He merely resides in
Russia, there is no evidence of him favoring
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 01:12:16 PM Adrian Colomitchi wrote:
> > Also remember that Assange seems to be a Russian agent.
>
> Oh, really?
Yes, anyone who claims that Russia has an open government is on the Russian
side. For all the flaws of the US government it doesn't openly kill
journalists that
> This isn't really news.
From the two messages: "Security by obscurity in these areas" vs "Assange
is ..." - which one would you consider relevant for you?
The very page linked in the original poster:
"The CIA made these systems unclassified.
Why the CIA chose to make its cyberarsenal
This isn't really news. After Snowden's information this is something most
people expected.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/assange-man-in-the-news/512243/
Also remember that Assange seems to be a Russian agent.
--
Sent from my Nexus 6P with K-9 Mail.
