sad to say, but you will have to find other ways to amuse yourself
elrod
Michael Rich wrote:
> > We have fixed a lot of the baddies in beta 1 but rumor has it
> > there are
> > still bugs lurking in our beloved product... please pound on this and
> > let us know about them.
>
> Does this mean
> We have fixed a lot of the baddies in beta 1 but rumor has it
> there are
> still bugs lurking in our beloved product... please pound on this and
> let us know about them.
Does this mean I can't watch the thread count for freeamp.exe jump to over
100 anymore? :)
mike
___
I'd just like to say that in beta 3, the very frequent, very random crashes in
the unix beta 1 _should_ be fixed. It's usable again =)
Isaac
At 04:15 PM 6/1/00 , you wrote:
>Beta 3 is now available on our website. Sorry again for the delay
>between releasing beta 1 and this release. I think we
Beta 3 is now available on our website. Sorry again for the delay
between releasing beta 1 and this release. I think we have solved the
release issues we were having.
We have fixed a lot of the baddies in beta 1 but rumor has it there are
still bugs lurking in our beloved product... please pound
Make sure you choose to do a Rebuild All... it might not have recompiled and
linked everything correctly... MSDev gets confused sometimes...
elrod
Victor Romero wrote:
> with my active configuratios I get this after bild freeamp.exe, but it asks
> me for the files dll still. =(
>
>
Also if you have the build toolbar showing you can choose which project is the
actve and which version to build by using the dropdowns.
if you use the SAet Active Configuration from the Build menu choose "FreeAmp -
NASM Release"
elrod
Chad Loder wrote:
> Rob wrote "If you choose your build tar
with my active configuratios I get this after bild freeamp.exe, but it asks
me for the files dll still. =(
Configuration: freeamp - Win32 NASM
Release
freeamp.exe - 0 error(s), 0 warning(s)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob wrote "If you choose your build target to be the NASM Release...",
so if that's what you want, then choose that one.
Then rebuild.
c
At 02:10 PM 5/31/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>there I have:
>x-Win 32 Release
>x-Win 32 Debug
>x-Win 32 NASM release
>x-win 32 NASM Debug
>
>x=faselib, e
there I have:
x-Win 32 Release
x-Win 32 Debug
x-Win 32 NASM release
x-win 32 NASM Debug
x=faselib, etc.
Then?
Thanks
Victor
- Original Message -
From: Chad Loder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: after compile in VC6++
> C
Choose "Set Active Configuration" from the "Build" menu
in VC++.
c
At 01:45 PM 5/31/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: Mayhem & Chaos Coordinator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:16 PM
>Subject: Re: after compile in
- Original Message -
From: Mayhem & Chaos Coordinator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: after compile in VC6++
>
> If you choose your build target to be the NASM Release and then rebuild
the
> entire codebase before giving it to
> "Error, there isn't this file VSC6OD.dll", obviously if I had this file I
> can run without problem, but if I want redistribuite it to all my friends,
> all they will need this file, how can I do to fix it (for dont asking for
> this file)?
If you choose your build target to be the NASM Release
Srdan wrote:
> I compiled & tested 2.0.7 & 2.1beta1 with WC 6.0
> (Visual C) on W95 osr2 and:
> 1) 2.0.7 doesn't compile clean and is not stable so i
> want mention it anymore. you should remove it from homepage.
> (the source, i mean)
>
What do you mean by does not compile cleanly? I know the
> I found freeamp recently and i really love it.
I'm glad you like it.
> Except for its numerous bugs and 20% more
> time consuming it beats winamp undoubtedly.
> Speed isn't something you should worry about
> (too much) but bugs maybe you should clear
> all bugs before implementing new fea
This mail maybe isn't exactly for freeamp-dev
but i hope you will be able to use it.
I found freeamp recently and i really love it.
Except for its numerous bugs and 20% more
time consuming it beats winamp undoubtedly.
Speed isn't something you should worry about
(too much) but bugs maybe you
well I have buil the freeamp, whit some changes and I decided show it to my
friends, but when I run it in the computer of my school it produces me an
error
"Error, there isn't this file VSC6OD.dll", obviously if I had this file I
can run without problem, but if I want redistribuite it to all my f
it should never go to the beginning unless you drag it there yourself inside the My
Music view. I did fix some bugs with drag and drop on the main player window that
should show up in beta 3.
elrod
Chad Loder wrote:
> Actually, this may be partly a restatement of the
> original problem. Draggin
Actually, this may be partly a restatement of the
original problem. Dragging a file onto the player
while playing another file seems to move the
dropped file to the head of the queue.
But...independently of whether the player
automatically starts playing the dropped file,
I always feel like it sh
We may want to base any XML help approach on JavaHelp. Sun
has defined a simple and general file format for platform
independent, context-sensitive help files. See
http://java.sun.com/products/javahelp/spec-1.0.pdf.
Obviously Freeamp is not implemented in Java, but it doesn't
appear that the raw
19 matches
Mail list logo
