Before upgrading from 9.2 to 10.0, I created a new boot environment
named 'pcbsd10.0'
with beadm. Then I activated it, and renamed the 'default' environment
to 'pcbsd9.2'.
As a test of the backup BE, I deactivated 'pcbsd10.0', reactivated
'pcbsd9.2', and re-booted.
The machine failed to boot, a
d execution failed [\\_SB_.MEM_._CRS] (Node
0xfe0003cfc380), AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT (20110527/uteval-113)
can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.MEM_ - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
cpu0: on acpi0
cpu1: on acpi0
Kostas
- Original Message - From: &qu
The core will always look like it is "running" in top, even when it is
asleep. That is just how FreeBSD accounts for idle CPU time. The only
thing I was hoping would change is the fan having to run. You can try
kldload'ing coretemp and seeing if the processor temperatures are
different when dee
12:28PM 0:00.02 [zfskern]
[ko@hui-neng ~]$
Kostas
On 05/31/2013 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 31, 2013 10:47:34 am Kostas Oikonomou wrote:
Thanks very much for the reply.
Being new to FreeBSD, this still seems weird to me. (My
background is Solaris.)
On both
that "idle"? I'm worried that the cores will
eventually be damaged.
Kostas
On 05/31/13 08:36 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:29:07 pm Kostas Oikonomou wrote:
Hello,
I am new to FreeBSD. I just installed 9.1-RELEASE-p
Hello,
I am new to FreeBSD. I just installed 9.1-RELEASE-p3 (comes with PC-BSD
9.1) on an HP Pavilion s5100z. The machine has a dual-core AMD Athlon
7750 processor.
What happens is that when I am doing nothing on the machine, one core
is about 150%
busy running the idle proces
