[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-05 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added Status|Open|In Progress

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-03 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit in branch main references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=0e494a9e3fd86ef54899dcbe0268866629096c1e commit 0e494a9e3fd86ef54899dcbe0268866629096c1e Author:

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #12 from m...@sentex.net --- Arggg, very sorry. My fault, I was not paying attention to !scp this AM as I was sending the built image to the wrong location to burn the resultant image. Anyways, I can confirm the boot looks good

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #11 from m...@sentex.net --- Hang on, this might be my issue when burning the image :( 2 secs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #10 from m...@sentex.net --- Hang on, this might be my issue when burning the image :( 2 secs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #9 from m...@sentex.net --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #8) Pretty sure I did it right. Just rebuilding now once more 0{nano13-i386}# git pull --ff-only Already up to date. 0{nano13-i386}# git restore

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #8 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to mike from comment #7) Are you certain the patch was applied and the right kernel is being tested? If so, can you show output of "sysctl kern.timecounter" from a working revision of the

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #7 from m...@sentex.net --- Created attachment 230635 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=230635=edit boot verbose with first patch applied boot verbose with patch applied -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #6 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to mike from comment #5) Could you show a verbose dmesg with the patch applied, please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #5 from m...@sentex.net --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #4) Not too much luck unfortunately. Boot time is still very slow although maybe not quite as slow ? I can benchmark to get an measured difference if you

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #4 from Mark Johnston --- Created attachment 230628 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=230628=edit proposed patch Could you please give this patch a try? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 --- Comment #3 from m...@sentex.net --- Even though the box is up 2hrs, the uptime shows 2 min Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help. OK boot -v ---<>--- Copyright (c) 1992-2021 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c)

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 m...@sentex.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@sentex.net --- Comment #2

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@freebsd.org

[Bug 260868] possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117

2022-01-01 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260868 Bug ID: 260868 Summary: possible i386 regression after ce35a3bc852d25cb989bc1f3dc4ddb723d7d5117 Product: Base System Version: 13.0-STABLE Hardware: Any