The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
gotten to the point that being associated with the project is often
more of a liability than an asset. I will attempt to explain how this
happened, what the current state of affairs is, and what needs to be
done to attempt to
On 31/08/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance.
If true, unfortunate. A sad day.
Jeff.
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello Charles,
Some parts of your message seemed to be flames resulting from some
past personality conflict that I know nothing about, so I won't
comment further on those. Clearly you are more familiar with BSD
internals than I am. I imagine others will pickup various technical
points such as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Charles,
Charles M. Hannum wrote:
popularity in 1993 and 1994) have suffered similar problems. FreeBSD
and XFree86, for example, have both forked successor projects (Dragonfly
and X.org) for very similar reasons.
I don't agree that Dragonfly
Charles M. Hannum wrote:
[I'm CCing this to FreeBSD and OpenBSD lists in order to share it with
the wider *BSD community, not to start a flame war. I hope that people
reading it have the tact to be respectful of their peers, and consider
how some of these issues may apply to them as well.]
Breen Ouellette wrote on Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:22:59PM -0600:
This really isn't relevant to OpenBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ head -n2 /var/run/dmesg.boot
OpenBSD 3.9-stable (GENERIC) #2: Wed Aug 30 16:53:43 CEST 2006
[EMAIL
Andy Ruhl wrote:
On 8/30/06, Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The NetBSD Project has stagnated to the point of irrelevance. It has
Let me start by saying I'm probably not qualified to reply to this
thread, but I was never worried about making a fool out of myself
before so
