On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:35:36 -0500
Tom Wickline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 10:30 PM, Marc Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the interesting things about socialism, in all in many evil
forms(including gnu/fsf), is that they simply must lie about their
program or no one
On Dec 18, 2007 10:06 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 12:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Placo. Com; Rob; FreeBSD Chat; Andrew Falanga
Subject:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
On Dec 18, 2007 10:06 AM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know, I'd never guessed that this much could come from such a simple
question.
The least the culprits could have done is not highjack the thread when
they moved to a new subject.
--
Dan Langille -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Redirected to -chat, because it got too flamish.
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Marian Hettwer wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:37:07 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
On Dec 18, 2007 2:08 PM, Chuck Robey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Redirected to -chat, because it got too flamish.
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Marian Hettwer wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:37:07 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL
Don't be foolish. Microsoft would have lost the case if they
had admitted the real reasons for what they did. It isn't to
MS's benefit to reveal anything about the real reasons they
do a thing.
That's true, but that completely undercuts your argument. Giving IE away to get
revenue for
On Dec 18, 2007 6:13 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only reason I suggested a petition is to demonstrate to Nvidia
that thee is a viable FreeBSD / PC-BSD userbase for amd64
my thinking was, they already have a i386 driver so an
My position: Microsoft pushed IE because they saw Java and Netscape
as a threat to their Windows monopoly.
Microsoft was very worried that the trial would focus on this and
they would end up with this as a ruling. So, they engineered
the focus on their destruction of Netscape. Everyone
If you got enough friends, and willing to pay some money, why not put
your money together to hire a programmer to work on a free and open
source driver like:
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org
The Linux camp were able to raise $10'000, though it wasn't organised
and the fund did not end up going
I will act as an arbiter for a minute here, can I?
The support for your position comes in bulk from historical data. Ted
holds that the whole Netscape ordeal was manipulated to intentionally
put Microsoft into vulnerable position in that respect, so as to divert
attention of the court from
MS dumped a pile of money into development of IE7 because it gets a
pile of money in return from the root certificate authorities. Just
like MS dumps a pile of money into development of operating systems
because they get a pile of money in return from the PC companies
that sell PC's with
11 matches
Mail list logo
