On 2012-11-16 12:48, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Hub- FreeBSD free...@hub.org wrote:
Actually, according to what we are tracking at http://bsdstats.org, there are
currently *8*:
PC-BSD
FreeBSD
PYC-BSD (aka Rus-BSD)
DesktopBSD
OpenBSD
NetBSD
DragonflyBSD
MidnightBSD
On 2012-11-13 11:45, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:08:08AM +0100, Joost van de Griek wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012, at 21:37 , Robin Björklin robin.bjork...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I bat crap crazy for thinking it could be good to merge the four largest BSD
variants out there,
On 2012-11-13 18:51, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Hi,
Reference:
From: Johnny Billquist b...@update.uu.se
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:34:56 +0100
Message-id: 50a23e70.8010...@update.uu.se
Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-11-13 11:45, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13
Andy Ruhl wrote:
On 8/31/06, Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BSD is about an operating system, not about a kernel.
Bingo. Good point. This point is lost sometimes.
I believe NetBSD has the proper philosophy in regards to the entire OS
as well. I don't want apache built in, for
