Author of GPC-Slots2 threatens to sue "John Doe" who violated GPL
recission.
(And who also added a "Code of Conduct", which Author of GPC-Slots2 is
opposed to on principal,
and who decided to impersonate Author aswell, registering a false
address in his nom-de-guerre)
http://8ch.net/tech/res/
Original Message
Subject: Re: GRSec is vital to Linux security
Date: 2019-01-24 16:25
From: Boris Lukashev
To: linuxgpl...@redchan.it
You've never heard of VMware, I take it? Its a proprietary half Linux
which beats GPL suits with strong arm tactics and technicalities. Unlike
On 2019-01-24 15:31, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
Do you have some actual proposals / patches ?
Sue Open Source Security / Bradly Spengler for copyright infringement.
Seek his profits as damages. I doubt you'll be able to get specific
performance since the GPL is not a contact in t
On 2019-01-23 20:46, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Interesting point of view. Well, to be honest it seems to me that
Linux kernel sacrifices the security for the sake of progress, so it
is quite bloated at the moment and I am not sure that even GRSecurity
could fix it. Linux really needs to stop adding new
There are two iron laws when it comes to the linux-kernel and it's
facing towards the larger world.
1) The grsecurity-pax patch is absolutely vital if one wishes to not be
hacked by chinese(TM). (And has been vital for the last 15+ years.)
2) GRSecurity is _blatantly_ violating the GPL by adding
