David Hoffman wrote:
Now, even if you're correct that Brett doesn't have a valid
copyright (which he does) and that unspecified entities unknown own
the copyright to the article (which they don't), we still have the
same problem: FreeBSD claiming to own something they don't, and
On 6/18/06, David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/18/06, Dennis Olvany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ...facts are not eligible for copyright.
>
> > I'm afraid you're incorrect. The work in question is indeed
> copyrightable
> > under the Berne Convention, which many countries have ra
