Randy Pratt wrote:
I think the page referenced may include release numbers from all
the reporting machines regardless of operating system.
Better numbers from the relatively small sample can be found at
http://www.bsdstats.org/freebsd/releases.php
Where is the link to that
Oliver Fromme wrote:
However, the number for 2.x systems seems a bit high indeed.
I think the users who still run 2.x systems tend to tune
them manually and watch the lists closely for things that
need to be patched.
Or the script is picking maybe NetBSD or OpenBSD, both of which had 2.x
Oliver Fromme wrote:
However, the number for 2.x systems seems a bit high indeed.
I think the users who still run 2.x systems tend to tune
them manually and watch the lists closely for things that
need to be patched.
Or the script is picking maybe NetBSD or OpenBSD, both of
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:40:11 +0200 (CEST)
Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Randy Pratt wrote:
I think the page referenced may include release numbers from all
the reporting machines regardless of operating system.
Better numbers from the relatively small sample can be found at
Randy Pratt wrote:
The numbers are definitely much too low to draw any conclusions
but they do raise some questions in my mind. Had I seen some
number of 3.x systems, the presence of 2.x boxes would seem less
conspicuous.
True.
Speaking for myself, I would not object to bsdstats in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver Fromme
Sent: 20 October 2006 09:17
To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD branches stats
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
BTW, is it possible
