In message pine.bsf.3.95.990514121818.24898a-100...@current1.whistle.com,
Julian Elischer writes:
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
This was due to a kludge in mfs implementation. Try change NUMCDEV in
kern_conf.c to 255.
Are you saying that there is a bug in the mfs
Tomoaki NISHIYAMA wrote:
From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
y-nakaga You bought a computer with the super-ultra-new Microsoft (tm)
y-nakaga Microsoft Bus (tm), for which you bought the latest and greatest
y-nakaga device X.
y-nakaga
y-nakaga It is extremely vulgar joke. I
Hi,
CLEAR is operating a pretty full mirror of ftp.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/
at ftp.clear.net.nz:/pub/FreeBSD/.
Dan Langille has kindly made ftp.nz.freebsd.org a CNAME to ftp.clear.net.nz
to make this easier to find.
Just thought I'd mention it -- I haven't done a clean install for a long
time,
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Bob Fayne wrote:
At 05:40 PM 4/27/99, you wrote:
I am looking for a firewall/VPN solution that will allow our company
personnel to connect to the corporate network using there Win95 laptops and
a Dynamic IP address from there ISP, when they are out traveling or working
In message pine.bsf.4.05.9905151255160.5798-100...@arnold.neland.dk, Leif Nel
and writes:
It won't compile under current.
freebsd/skip_es.c breaks at
if (suser(p-p_ucred, p-p_acflag )) {
This won't compile, because suser only has one parameter.
Trying blindly to change it to:
Could you please consider the following patch to
/usr/src/release/Makefile? It may not be entirely correct,
but it allows a 'cd /usr/src/release make release' to
run to completion. In the kernel makefile, 'kernel'
is not a target, ${KERNEL} is, and ${KERNEL} has the value
'GENERIC'.
Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
--
[gjvc] We're not laughing at you; we're laughing with you.
But I'm not laughing.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Andrew Atrens wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Rick Whitesel wrote:
I just wanted to say that I really appreciate the work you have/are
doing. The disk drive performance under IDE is very important for the
practical use of FreeBSD.
Thank you!
I second that
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Tomoaki NISHIYAMA wrote:
From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
y-nakaga You bought a computer with the super-ultra-new Microsoft (tm)
y-nakaga Microsoft Bus (tm), for which you bought the latest and greatest
y-nakaga device
It seems Brian Feldman wrote:
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Andrew Atrens wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Rick Whitesel wrote:
I just wanted to say that I really appreciate the work you have/are
doing. The disk drive performance under IDE is very important for the
practical use of
It seems Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
Hmm, this sounds stange, I have a noard here with the Alladin on it on
which I did the support for the ata driver, it works just fine for me
at least...
Actually, I am having the same sort of problem.. With all the flags set
properly in the wd
As Doug Rabson wrote ...
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Yeah. That must be why my 164lx won't netboot.
Could well be. My Aspen Alpine refused to with a DE500. A DE435 (10mbit
only) worked just dandy.
That reminds me. Does your Alpine still work after the new-bus stuff?
On Thu, 13 May 1999 10:41:23 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson d...@nlsystems.com said:
As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I
don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly
don't want to continue a flamewar).
Can people please just
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
As Doug Rabson wrote ...
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Yeah. That must be why my 164lx won't netboot.
Could well be. My Aspen Alpine refused to with a DE500. A DE435 (10mbit
only) worked just dandy.
That reminds me.
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Noriyuki Soda wrote:
On Thu, 13 May 1999 10:41:23 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson d...@nlsystems.com said:
As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I
don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly
don't want to
Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
--
[gjvc] We're not laughing at you; we're laughing with you.
But I'm not laughing.
I committed a fix yesterday afternoon, could you
I sent in a patch to PR 10570 a couple days ago, after quite a bit of
testing (and catching up on email while changing countries..)
So, if someone wants to commit the patch..
Thanks (and it took too long, i know..)
adrian
--
Adrian Chadd
adr...@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 11:55:42AM +, George Cox wrote:
# Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
#
# screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
to add a little bit: when the kernel has SMP enabled. at least here,
checked 3 machines.
--
-mishania
To Unsubscribe:
On Sat, 15 May 1999 15:58:01 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson d...@nlsystems.com said:
I would like to postpone until after Usenix. I'm sure that we will be able
to sort out any technical misunderstandings there which will make it
possible to have a reasonable public discussion.
OK, I'll
Josef Karthauser wrote:
Couldn't it read:
tcp_extensions=NO # Switch RFC1323 extensions on?
How about:
tcp_extensions=NO # Set to Yes to turn on RFC1323 extensions
That would match existing style and be a lot more clear. I can submit a PR
if anyone thinks that's really
This morning, I did an installworld and booted a new -current
world and -current kernel (Sources from morning of Fri May 14th).
I got the following messages during the SCSI probe:
Waiting 10 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
aha0: ahafetchtransinfo - Inquire Setup Info Failed
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Bret A. Ford wrote:
Waiting 10 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
aha0: ahafetchtransinfo - Inquire Setup Info Failed
(probe20:aha0:0:5:0): CCB 0xc553b450 - timed out
(probe20:aha0:0:5:0): CCB 0xc553b450 - timed out
aha0: No longer in timeout
I'm seeing the same thing, but
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
At 3:51 PM +0700 5/12/99, Ustimenko Semen wrote:
Are we going to get this license? I am interested in NTFS
source code a lot...
I would be very careful about getting an NT source license if
your intention is to write NTFS support for some
Fyi,
With today's -current, while trying to restore some files from a recent (about
3 days ago) dump, I'm seeing:
/kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:3:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than suplied buffer
Oh, and mounting
swap /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,-s=32768 0 0
panics the system with a
Fyi,
With today's -current, while trying to restore some files from a recent (about
3 days ago) dump, I'm seeing:
/kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:3:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than suplied buffer
This is because a bug was fixed that actually now correctly reports the
problem.
You've
Dear people,
I get no sound anymore using the system built on Friday.
As I saw same earlier reports here about problems with sound
that were reported to be fixed, mine might be related to the card
being a PCI one - ES1370 based genuine Ensoniq Audio PCI.
Below follow dmesg output and kernel
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:50:10PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
You've made this tape with a 64KB record. You need to give an argument to
recover that understands this.
Ahh ``-b 64'', I recall the discussion with Wilko Bulte a few days ago now.
Sorry for the false alert :-/
panics the system
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:50:10PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
You've made this tape with a 64KB record. You need to give an argument to
recover that understands this.
Ahh ``-b 64'', I recall the discussion with Wilko Bulte a few days ago now.
Sorry for the false alert :-/
Let me know
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 01:13:27PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Let me know how it goes...
Quite well, thank you :)
jos:/home/jos# restore -ivb 64
Verify tape and initialize maps
Dump date: Wed May 12 23:36:39 1999
Dumped from: the epoch
Level 0 dump of / on jos.bugworks.com:/dev/da2s1a
Label:
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Mikhail A. Sokolov wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 11:55:42AM +, George Cox wrote:
# Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
#
# screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
to add a little bit: when the kernel has SMP enabled. at least here,
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Narvi wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
At 3:51 PM +0700 5/12/99, Ustimenko Semen wrote:
Are we going to get this license? I am interested in NTFS
source code a lot...
I would be very careful about getting an NT source license if
your
On Fri, 14 May 1999 19:34:43 CDT, Anthony Kimball wrote:
If anyone has applied reasonable stress to a recent MP kernel,
preferrably with X, VESA, VM86, and found it stable, do please report
on your last cvs update time: I, for one, would very much like to
isolate a fairly stable post-newbus
Make buildworld fails here with:
===/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl
find: build: No such file or directory
find: build: No such file or directory
mkdir: lib/auto: File exists
*** Error code 1
Stop.
Thordur Ivarsson
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
It won't compile under current.
freebsd/skip_es.c breaks at
if (suser(p-p_ucred, p-p_acflag )) {
This won't compile, because suser only has one parameter.
Trying blindly to change it to:
if (suser(p-p_ucred)) {
Better yet, read the manpage for
It would probably be very unwise for the project to get get the licence.
However, considering that we support loadable filesystem modules, somebody
adventurous enough can get the licence and write a (separate distributed,
possibly even only as binary) module.
Downloading a kld module
I replied to this in private, but, for the record, it was not a
joke.
Ok, I see your say. I feel inadequate metaphor and provocation
form, so that message seemed vulgar joke.
New-bus's goal is meaningful, but not only that one. Also
newconfig is same. Difference between these is realization
I had two systems reboot at nearly the same time. (30 seconds apart), and
are completely unrelated.
These both look like stack damage, actually.
One system was running 2.2.8, and my core file presents me with this:
su-2.02# gdb -k
GDB is free software and you are welcome to distribute
One system was running 2.2.8, and my core file presents me with this:
...
Just out of curiosity, are either of these systems running with NCR
controllers?
In case you're fishing, I'm running 4 NCR equipped boxes (510 and 575)
with FreeBSD 2.2.8-stable right now and have seen *NO* problems
38 matches
Mail list logo
