Re: no openssh after build

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, R Joseph Wright wrote: > > > I just built a new world today and openssh does not appear to be > > installed. I have the directories /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl but they are > > empty. There is no /usr/bin/ssh. > > I've been trying to fol

Re: openssh question

Edwin Kremer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >" OpenSSH is based on my version from back in 1995 or 1996. The OpenSSH >" folks have fixed many of the (security) bugs in that version, but not >" all of them when I last checked. Some of the problems in SSH1 are >" very fundamental. >

Re: current lockups

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm interested in the fix, of course :-) But where to start looking? I've > had three lockups so far (none before january 2000) but I didn't find > anything that reliably triggered it. I had a lockup yesterday wh

BookPC Intel 810 chipset

is there support for sound using the i810 chipset? I hear it isn't such a hot chipset but it does alott.. I have a BookPC here which would make a great work station reguardless of how much the chipset may suck.. support for X seems to exist in the linux world and the Davicomm 10/100 ethernet

sysinstall and the status of des encryption?

Hi, A quick question before I try to come up with a fix and patches for a problem that I believe to be a moving target. I have run 'make release' to create 4.0-2306-SNAP with sources current as of 2am March 6th. When running sysinstall and selecting the encryption

Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Ambrisko writes: : Another alternative is to remove the setuid bits /usr/bin/ssh and : then do a "runsocks ssh". That's not really an option for my work patterns... : I could do the work if deemed usefull. I don't want to maintain : my own branch and we use t

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Apart from my stupidness of not checking the location of the binary > first -- what did I do wrong, and what's the recommended way of > handling this? Am I supposed to rm /usr/bin/ssh each time I install a > new release or snapshot? I can't believe that

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Did you read the error message? > > Yes, I did, it was not helpful. In fact, it was confusing. Without still having seen the error message you were confused by, I can't do much else to help. I can't think of a better way to explain how to fix the p

Re: FINAL: Installation floppies and USB

Oops: That's kudos for John *Baldwin,* NOT "Barton." A thousand pardons... John __ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the me

RE: FINAL: installation floppies and USB

On 07-Mar-00 John Daniels wrote: > Hi: > My installation problem has been solved. For those of you who have not been > following "Installation floppies and USB," I have written a short synopsis > after my description of the resolution and conclusion. Good, glad you got your system working. >

Re: kern/16487: please apply newpcm fix

Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-current: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000 01:22:41 +0100 (CET), > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Oliver> Would someone please (pretty please) have a look at kern/16487 > Oliver> and commit the trivial fix in it? It's just one line,

Re: ipv6 and rc.conf questions

> > > Wmmm, should rtadvd always be invoked when 'ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" ? Oh, I need to conclude about this. > (2): Yes there is. Usually it is desirable that only upstream > router invoke rtadvd to suppress too many redirects. > In following case, only R-backbone should invoke rta

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-current: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > the ports (yeah, stupid me), to no avail. It complained about some > > RSA library missing. > > Did you read the error message? Yes, I did, it was not helpful. In fact, it was c

Re: vinum: CDEV_MAJOR undeclared

thanks for your responses. I seem to have commented out src-all and just fetched -sys and -release, then forgot about that. so my v.c (and everything else) was outdated... sorry to have bothered you with this stupid behaviour. martin On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 6 Marc

Re: openssh question

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Out of the OpenBSD repository, or out of the OpenSSH project? Both are the same thing. > Note that www.openssh.COM currently says: > > *NEW* OpenSSH 1.2.3 released March 6, 2000 > > which sounds a lot like a new release to me... They (arbi

Re: no openssh after build

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, R Joseph Wright wrote: > I just built a new world today and openssh does not appear to be > installed. I have the directories /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl but they are > empty. There is no /usr/bin/ssh. > I've been trying to follow the discussions on this issue and I understood > t

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured inrc.conf?

Hi, Very unfortunately, 6to4 is not yet supported in FreeBSD/KAME. So now available options will be, -Use freenet6 (for one hosts). -Get IPv6 address block and connect to 6bone using gif tunnel. Cheers, Yoshinobu Inoue > > Please read, then ask any questions you may have. 6to4 is currently

Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

> : I'd like to get this committed - I'll try and take a look at it tonight, > : time permitting. I would definitely like to allow SSH to work with dante, > : though, since that's a better (BSDL) alternative than the restricted NEC > : version. I don't know well about dante, but if it is one of s

Re: ipv6 and rc.conf questions

Hi, > > Wmmm, should rtadvd always be invoked when 'ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" ? > > Hmmm...two things come to mind. 1) What happens if there are two > routers running rtadvd on a single subnet? 2) Are there environments in > which a netadmin might not want to use router advertisements? (1): I

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured inrc.conf?

Hi, > Hello, > > Now that I have several machines running FreeBSD 4.0, I started to > play with IPv6. It's fun! I have plans to set up a v6-over-v4 tunnel > and connect to the 6Bone. > > I read /usr/share/examples/IPv6/USAGE, /usr/share/doc/IPv6/IMPLEMENTATION > and some documents at the KAME w

Re: vinum: CDEV_MAJOR undeclared

On Monday, 6 March 2000 at 23:13:17 +0100, Martin Dieringer wrote: > > when making buildworld, I get an error: > > ===> sbin/vinum > cc -O2 -pipe -m486 -I/usr/src/sbin/vinum/../../sys -Wall -DVINUMDEBUG > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/sbin/vinum/v.c > /usr/src/sbin/vinum/v.c:

Re: Error: no such 386 instruction: `state' ???

I was having this problem a few weeks ago while trying to make world. I had just gotten a new motherboard, that was letting me overclock my processor (it offered new bus speeds). I reset the processor to run at its default speed, and I have not seen this error since. So, if you are overclocked at

Re: Error: no such 386 instruction: `state' ???

Oops! Sorry for the double post. :( Kmail got stupid on me... -- Regards, Devin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

no openssh after build

I just built a new world today and openssh does not appear to be installed. I have the directories /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl but they are empty. There is no /usr/bin/ssh. I've been trying to follow the discussions on this issue and I understood that this is now part of the default base system.

Error: no such 386 instruction: `state' ???

Hi, I am running a current snap from 2/28. FreeBSD dbm.wireless.net 4.0-2228-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-2228-CURRENT #2: Fri Mar 3 22:19:33 PST 2000 Often when compiling a port, the process fails with messages like the following: [...] Compiling smbd/pipes.c Compiling smbd/predict.c Compili

Error: no such 386 instruction: `state' ???

Hi, I'm running a snap from 2/28: FreeBSD dbm.wireless.net 4.0-2228-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-2228-CURRENT #2: Fri Mar 3 22:19:33 PST 2000 Often when compiling a port, the process will fail with messages like the following: [...] Compiling smbd/noquotas.c Compiling smbd/reply.c {standard in

Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

James E. Pace writes: | | I rebuilt -current on Friday, and OpenSSH does not work through a | SOCKS firewall. | | In my make.conf, I have "USE_SOCKS= YES", which is used in the | ports/security/ssh port. As mentioned we have ssh in the base system so your are picking that up. Another alternativ

Re: which(1), rewritten in C?

On Friday, March 03, 2000, Matthew Hunt wrote: > and the "type" builtin is too verbose, saying "which is hashed > (/usr/bin/which)." In ksh, `whence' is a bit equivalent to `which' (`type' in ksh is an alias to `whence -v'). From the AT&T ksh manual: whence [ -afpv ] name ...

single user weirdness

A strange thing has happened while booting into single user mode. My / filesystem was mounted on wd0s4a even though I have updated /dev and /etc/fstab to use ad0s4a. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: openssh question

At 10:37 PM +0100 3/6/00, Christian Weisgerber wrote: >William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How do we update it, ie, when a updated version comes out. > >OpenSSH doesn't really have releases. The upstream version is >straight out of the OpenBSD repository. I assume several of our >develope

FINAL: installation floppies and USB

Hi: My installation problem has been solved. For those of you who have not been following "Installation floppies and USB," I have written a short synopsis after my description of the resolution and conclusion. SOLUTION: I discovered that my Acer Aspire (model 6140) has two PS/2 ports (for key

Re: current lockups

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 03:46:25PM -0600, Marius Strom wrote: >Unfortunately, the discussions occurred while the mailing list archive was >kaput (WD Drive on UDMA66? =]) so it's not archived where I can find it. I think this is the thread you're looking for: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=9

Re: [ID 20000306.004] unpack(NaN) big baddaboom

On 2000-Mar-07 05:35:04 +1100, Ian Grigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >my $packed = "\0\0\xc0\x7f"; >print STDERR "len: ", length($packed), " bytes: ", unpack("H*", $packed), "\n"; >my $float = unpack("f", $packed); >print STDERR "float done\n"; >print STDERR "float: $float\n"; Looking at the resul

Re: openssh question

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:23:45AM -0800, William Woods wrote: > Now that openssh is in the base system, I assume it will no longer be in the > ports. How do we update it, ie, when a updated version comes out. I would > rather not make world just to update that. # cvsup standard-supfile (until 4.

Re: current lockups

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:59:21PM +0100, Dave Boers wrote: > It is rumoured that Peter Jeremy had the courage to say: > > Note that ntpd will use rtprio if the Posix P1003.1b extensions aren't > > enabled in the kernel. (These were enabled by default in GENERIC on > > i386 in mid-January). If y

Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway writes: : On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: : : > Sure. Here's what I have in my uncommitted tree. It assumes that you : > have socks installed already. Known to work with the nec port, not : > known one way or the other on dante. : > : > Oh,

Re: current lockups

It is rumoured that Peter Jeremy had the courage to say: > Note that ntpd will use rtprio if the Posix P1003.1b extensions aren't > enabled in the kernel. (These were enabled by default in GENERIC on > i386 in mid-January). If you have the new ntpd (rather than xntpd) > and are running a kernel

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > Is this any better? I've removed the emotionally charged > compatibility word. Some more picking :) > 2225: > OpenSSH has been added to FreeBSD. This may conflict with the > ports/security/ssh port since it installs binaries into >

Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > Sure. Here's what I have in my uncommitted tree. It assumes that you > have socks installed already. Known to work with the nec port, not > known one way or the other on dante. > > Oh, there's lots of warnings from this, but it does work. I'd like to

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

Is this any better? I've removed the emotionally charged compatibility word. 2225: OpenSSH has been added to FreeBSD. This may conflict with the ports/security/ssh port since it installs binaries into /usr/bin and the port goes into /usr/local/bin. Most paths

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Arindum Mukerji wrote: > Also, going from an OpenSSH 1.2.2 box to an SSH-1.2.27 box is fine - it > coughs up a hairball when going to the F-Secure 1.3.7 commercial variant > though. Ahh, so you can use the OpenSSH client to connect to some servers, but not the F-Secure one? T

Re: current lockups

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Jeremy writes : >> How about these Peltier (sp ?) cooling devices I have heard about ? > >A Peltier cell is just a semiconductor heat pump. It effectively just >reduces the junction-to-heatsink thermal resistance, allowing you (in >theory) to use a less effi

Re: current lockups

On 2000-Mar-07 06:29:17 +1100, Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say: >> Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in >> succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old) >> on a Dual celeron box (BP6)

Re: current lockups

On 2000-Mar-06 21:39:11 +1100, Matthew Sean Thyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >My computer had been stable all winter (with setiathome runnning full >time) but suddenly come the Australian summer it started freezing. And it's been the coldest summer for something like 5 years... > How about these

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:22:45AM -0800, Bob Fink wrote: > Please read, then ask any questions you may have. 6to4 is currently > supported, and there are relay routers up and running. My apologies if I sound like I need "IPv6 for Dummies". Just to clarify. You mean that 6to4 is currently sup

vinum: CDEV_MAJOR undeclared

when making buildworld, I get an error: ===> sbin/vinum cc -O2 -pipe -m486 -I/usr/src/sbin/vinum/../../sys -Wall -DVINUMDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/sbin/vinum/v.c /usr/src/sbin/vinum/v.c: In function `make_devices': /usr/src/sbin/vinum/v.c:494: `CDEV_MAJOR' undeclared (

Re: current lockups

> Interesting. I'll check my own archives of -current to see if I can find > the discussion. I always thought that the "Lost Disk Contact" messages were > due to the disk recalibrating itself after six days of continued use. After > Soren increased the timeout from 5 to 10 seconds, I never saw the

Re: current lockups

It is rumoured that Marius Strom had the courage to say: > Well, there was a discussion a few weeks back with Soren Schmidt and a few > others. I believe the conclusion was made that this occurred with most WD > drives (interesting about the WD == IBM part, I did notice he mentioned > that in -cu

Re: openssh question

On 6 Mar 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > Now that openssh is in the base system, I assume it will no longer > > be in the ports. > > I expect the port to be maintained for the remaining lifetime of > the 3.x branch. This is of no concern to 4.x users, of course. Correct. We should probabl

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, David Malone wrote: > I'd leave it saying that it isn't 100% compatible - it may sound > bad but it's true. There are several other things that aren't the > same: default options are different, some options have been removed > (AllowHosts is one that I know of), it produces wa

Re(2): IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

At 01:31 PM 3/6/2000 -0800, Nora Parker wrote: >I am trying to get an ipv6 address. I tried a local source but have not >heard any reply. Can anyone help me out with an address. I am a student >at Cal State Monterey Bay working on a capstone project. I would >appreciate any help in this matte

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > +2225: > + OpenSSH has been added to FreeBSD. This may conflict with the > + ssh port since it installs binaries into /usr/bin and the port You probably should refer to the ports by name: /usr/ports/security/ssh and /usr/ports/security/openss

Re: current lockups

Dave, Well, there was a discussion a few weeks back with Soren Schmidt and a few others. I believe the conclusion was made that this occurred with most WD drives (interesting about the WD == IBM part, I did notice he mentioned that in -current a few weeks ago as well). I had a WD20 gig that woul

Re: openssh question

William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that openssh is in the base system, I assume it will no longer > be in the ports. I expect the port to be maintained for the remaining lifetime of the 3.x branch. This is of no concern to 4.x users, of course. > How do we update it, ie, when a upda

Re: current lockups

It is rumoured that Marius Strom had the courage to say: > I'm willing to bet a nickel (perhaps more) you people are running non-IBM > UDMA66 drives on that BP6. Seems that most UDMA66 drives are not actually > UDMA66 compliant, and they only drives that have been reported successful > on the BP

Re(2): IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

I am trying to get an ipv6 address. I tried a local source but have not heard any reply. Can anyone help me out with an address. I am a student at Cal State Monterey Bay working on a capstone project. I would appreciate any help in this matter. Thank You To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI

Re: current lockups

I'm willing to bet a nickel (perhaps more) you people are running non-IBM UDMA66 drives on that BP6. Seems that most UDMA66 drives are not actually UDMA66 compliant, and they only drives that have been reported successful on the BP6 are IBM. Try taking your HD's off the UDMA66 controller and pu

Re: current lockups

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Dave Boers wrote: > > on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled. > > Finally. I've been complaining about this on several occasions. I'm also > running UDMA66 and Dual Celeron BP6. No overclocking. Can you people reproduce this on a kernel without

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

If memory serves me right, David Malone wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 01:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > > : > + Openssh isn't 100% compatible with ssh, so some care needs to > > : > + be taken in its operation. > > : > > : This sounds bad. Are you referring to the -o syntax

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 01:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > : > + Openssh isn't 100% compatible with ssh, so some care needs to > : > + be taken in its operation. > : > : This sounds bad. Are you referring to the -o syntax differences, or actual > : incompatabilities? There have been unsubsta

ports/net/tund not compiling.

Looks like some very recent breakage: cc -O -pipe -g -DDEBUG -DNO_IDEA -static -o tund main.o tund.o secur.o scb.o utils.o md5.o alarm.o cipher.o search.o -L/usr/lib -lmd -lcrypto /usr/lib/libcrypto.a(rsa_lib.o): In function `RSA_new_method': rsa_lib.o(.text+0x91): undefined reference to `RSA_P

Re: current lockups

> The cooling theory sounds the most plausible so far. I'm not over clocking > my CPUs (Celeron 366s) and have appropriate cooling installed. But the > machine is kept in a small room, with a bunch of other machines and gets > a bit warm at times. I have seen a couple of suggestions that this may

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway writes: : On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: : : > + want to run the new servers. You may need to move your key : > + and other config files from /usr/local/etc to /etc. : : /etc/ssh Thanks. : > + Openssh isn't 100% compatible with ssh,

Re: /usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

In message "James E. Pace" writes: : I rebuilt -current on Friday, and OpenSSH does not work through a : SOCKS firewall. : : In my make.conf, I have "USE_SOCKS= YES", which is used in the : ports/security/ssh port. : : Any help? Sure. Here's w

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > + want to run the new servers. You may need to move your key > + and other config files from /usr/local/etc to /etc. /etc/ssh > + Openssh isn't 100% compatible with ssh, so some care needs to > + be taken in its operation. This sounds b

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

Warner Losh wrote: > + You will also need to enable openssh in /etc/rc.conf if you > + want to run the new servers. You may need to move your key > + and other config files from /usr/local/etc to /etc. Looks fine except config files go in /etc/ssh, not /etc. Jim Bloom [EMAIL P

Re: current lockups

It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say: > The cooling theory sounds the most plausible so far. I'm not over clocking > my CPUs (Celeron 366s) and have appropriate cooling installed. But the > machine is kept in a small room, with a bunch of other machines and gets > a bit warm at t

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jim Bloom writes: : Did Warner include this with his changes to UPDATING about openssh in : the base system (which I haven't seen yet). No. I didn't, but I will. Here's my current draft that I'll commit after a while... Index: UPDATING ===

Re: Small bug in chown and chgrp ?

It is rumoured that Alfred Perlstein had the courage to say: > have you deleted your stale copies of chown/chgrp? hint look in > /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin and make sure the old ones aren't > "in the way". Yes I have. Because I got a new disk, I did a fresh install of -current a few weeks ag

Re: current lockups

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 08:27:18PM +0100, Dave Boers wrote: > > Has this been fixed ? Is anyone interested in investigating ? > > I'll post more info if I find anything. > > I'm interested in the fix, of course :-) But where to start looking? I've > had three lockups so far (none before january 2

Re: Small bug in chown and chgrp ?

* Dave Boers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000306 13:36]: > chown: illegal option -- v > usage: chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] owner[:group] file ... >chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] :group file ... >chgrp [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] group file ... > A simple pat

Re: Small bug in chown and chgrp ?

* Dave Boers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000306 12:08] wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been bitten by the following: > > 44 relativity ~ % chown -v djb:wheel test > chown: illegal option -- v > usage: chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] owner[:group] file ... >chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-

RE: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

> The exception is for "6to4" prefixes which are in the > 2002::/16 TLA space. > See the I-D: > > > > Please read, then ask any questions you may have. 6to4 is currently > supported, and there are relay routers up and runnin

/usr/bin/ssh and SOCKS

I rebuilt -current on Friday, and OpenSSH does not work through a SOCKS firewall. In my make.conf, I have "USE_SOCKS= YES", which is used in the ports/security/ssh port. Any help? Thanks, James This letter brought to you by: * **

Small bug in chown and chgrp ?

Hi all, I've been bitten by the following: 44 relativity ~ % chown -v djb:wheel test chown: illegal option -- v usage: chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] owner[:group] file ... chown [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v] :group file ... chgrp [-R [-H | -L | -P]] [-f] [-h] [-v]

Re: current lockups

It is rumoured that Arun Sharma had the courage to say: > Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in > succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old) > on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled. Finally. I've been complaining about this on sever

Re: openssh question

Now that openssh is in the base system, I assume it will no longer be in the ports. How do we update it, ie, when a updated version comes out. I would rather not make world just to update that. -- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 06-Mar-00 Time: 11:22:26l -

Re: [ID 20000306.004] unpack(NaN) big baddaboom

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Grigg writes: >> Depending on your religion the bug is either in perl itself which >> should be more careful about NaN and Inf values, or in the perl >> script you supply which does something which is patently bogus, >> but nothing which should provoke a FP tra

Re: [ID 20000306.004] unpack(NaN) big baddaboom

More on that! Lads here took this to heart and put the debugger over the code. Apparently, Linux uses glibc which sets the flags in FPU to ignore the cmp-NaN fault. Then, I guess, Perl picks it up and turns it into NaN. OTOH, FreeBSD libraries don't do that, and the FPU causes the cmp-NaN faul

Re: openssh question

At 11:29 AM +0100 3/6/00, Edwin Kremer wrote: >On a side note: last week, Tatu Ylonen, principal author of SSH, posted a >message on the SSH mailing-list (in the thread about the new SSH2 license) >saying that: > > " OpenSSH is based on my version from back in 1995 or 1996. The > " OpenSSH fo

Re: [ID 20000306.004] unpack(NaN) big baddaboom

That is because FreeBSD correctly traps operations on the value NaN. Depending on your religion the bug is either in perl itself which should be more careful about NaN and Inf values, or in the perl script you supply which does something which is patently bogus, but nothing which should provoke

unpack(NaN) big baddaboom

This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], generated with the help of perlbug 1.26 running under perl 5.00503. - [Please enter your report here] Running following program causes "Floating point exception" on FreeBSD 3.2

Re: Discussions and "facts" [Was: Re: ssh strangeness in -current...]

Marc Schneiders wrote: > > I find it quite a problem that one is supposed to read very long > threads of discussions (which one may not be interested in, does not > have the time for, or cannot understand) in order to find the > information necessary to run and keep up with current without > prob

Discussions and "facts" [Was: Re: ssh strangeness in -current...]

On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I'm quite surprised you've missed any discussion of OpenSSH here though, > since it's probably been one of the most discussed topics here for the > past few weeks. > I find it quite a problem that one is supposed to read very long threads of discussion

Re: openssh question

Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:29:39AM +0100, Edwin Kremer wrote: > > >" I do not recommend use of OpenSSH (or SSH1 generally, for that matter) . > > > > There hasn't been much followup on this. Anybody here who cares to > > comment on this? What issues are relevant he

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

Eugene, At 09:00 AM 3/6/2000 -0800, Eugene M. Kim wrote: >(Cc'ed to the 6BONE mailing list in the hope that someone there could >answer my question as well) > >Speaking of the address allocation, is there a way for an individual to >get a non-local address space (so that all of my machines can ge

Re: openssh question

On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:29:39AM +0100, Edwin Kremer wrote: >" I do not recommend use of OpenSSH (or SSH1 generally, for that matter). > > There hasn't been much followup on this. Anybody here who cares to > comment on this? What issues are relevant here and how bad is it? I'm sure he'd m

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

Bill Fenner wrote: > > Bruce is right that machines expect to learn their prefixes from their > local router; however if you're just playing around you might want to > set it yourself. The easiest way I've found to do this is to say that > this machine is a router: > > # sysctl -w net.inet6.ip6

Re: about releng3.freebsd.org

> > just a thought, would it be possible to have ls-lR and ls-lR.gz > > over there? > You could just ftp into the server, and at the root directory, do: > ls -lR ls-lR > It will ask you if you want to save to local file ls-lR. Press y. yeah, i know. but it's not the same. besides, i would expect

rpc.lockd and xdr.

Version 2 of the lock manager is ready to be released. Amitha says that it passes all of the tests in the suite posted by Drew (thanks Drew). A noteable exception to this is on SGI where some lock requests are never even received from the remote host. Also DOS sharing is not yet complete. On a

Re: about releng3.freebsd.org

mika ruohotie wrote: > > just a thought, would it be possible to have ls-lR and ls-lR.gz > over there? You could just ftp into the server, and at the root directory, do: ls -lR ls-lR It will ask you if you want to save to local file ls-lR. Press y. - Donn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured inrc.conf?

(Cc'ed to the 6BONE mailing list in the hope that someone there could answer my question as well) Speaking of the address allocation, is there a way for an individual to get a non-local address space (so that all of my machines can get an unique IPv6 address)? I've read through the 6BONE website

subscribe

subscribe -- Charles A. Plater| "You think it's a conspiracy by the networks to put Systems Analyst | bad shows on TV. But the shows are bad because that's Wayne State Univ.| what people want. It's not like Windows users don't [EMAIL PROTECTED] | have any power; I think they are

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

Bruce is right that machines expect to learn their prefixes from their local router; however if you're just playing around you might want to set it yourself. The easiest way I've found to do this is to say that this machine is a router: # sysctl -w net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1 net.inet6.ip6.forwa

Re: ipv6 and rc.conf questions

If memory serves me right, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: > If you did update and make world recently, please check > /usr/share/examples/IPv6/USAGE. There will be more detailed info. > A handbook chapter version is now under preparation. That's good to hear. I was thinking about this a little bit, but

Re: IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

If memory serves me right, "Jose M. Alcaide" wrote: > Now that I have several machines running FreeBSD 4.0, I started to > play with IPv6. It's fun! I have plans to set up a v6-over-v4 tunnel > and connect to the 6Bone. > > I read /usr/share/examples/IPv6/USAGE, /usr/share/doc/IPv6/IMPLEMENTATIO

about releng3.freebsd.org

just a thought, would it be possible to have ls-lR and ls-lR.gz over there? it'd make it easier/possible for me to make proper mirror site... mickey To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

IPv6: can a link-site (or global) address be configured in rc.conf?

Hello, Now that I have several machines running FreeBSD 4.0, I started to play with IPv6. It's fun! I have plans to set up a v6-over-v4 tunnel and connect to the 6Bone. I read /usr/share/examples/IPv6/USAGE, /usr/share/doc/IPv6/IMPLEMENTATION and some documents at the KAME web site. However, I

Re: things I noticed w/ 4.0

Joseph Jacobson wrote: > > VESA is compiled into the kernel. I don't have a /boot/loader.conf > file. Is there any other way for the VESA module to be loaded at boot, > before /etc/rc runs? Also, none of the vidcontrol VESA modes work for > me. (All this isn't a big deal, but the error messag

Re: ssh strangeness in -current...

John Baldwin wrote: > > On 06-Mar-00 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > >> the ports (yeah, stupid me), to no avail. It complained about some > >> RSA library missing. > > > > Did you read the error message? Perhaps you should. Perhaps reporting it > > here w

  1   2   >