Re: rc.d startup scripts

2000-05-07 Thread Mike Nowlin
> Fine, you can quote historical context to argue against doing something > similar to SVR4 init. I, however, see nothing wrong with making it easier > to manage the daemons. Of course, that does not necessarily need to go in > the rc.d scripts. This is as it should be.. "rc" files (and directo

ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Greg Lehey
I've just built a new kernel, based on a cvsup at 2030 UTC on 6 May, and since then *some* Ethernet transactions don't work. I've checked that it's not just a dead card: the previous kernel works fine. I have the funny situation that I can send fine, and I can traceroute to the box, but I can't

Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
Can someone explain to me why pax(1) has (undocumented) switches which select some tape devices, but apparently randomly numbered ones: >From tar.h: /* * default device names */ #define DEV_0 "/dev/rmt0" #define DEV_1 "/dev/rmt1" #define DEV_4 "/dev/rmt4" #define

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 06:44:39PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > I've just built a new kernel, based on a cvsup at 2030 UTC on 6 May, > and since then *some* Ethernet transactions don't work. I've checked > that it's not just a dead card: the previous kernel works fine. I > have the funny situation

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Oliver Schonefeld
Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Andrey A. Chernov: > On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 06:44:39PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > > I've just built a new kernel, based on a cvsup at 2030 UTC on 6 May, > > and since then *some* Ethernet transactions don't work. I've checked > > that it's not just a dead card: the p

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Oliver Schonefeld
Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Oliver Schonefeld: [snip] > > It is not dead card, it is broken TCP, see my similar report in -current, I > > notice it several hours ago right after TCP changes was commited. > > Same thing here, but the problems have gone to -stabe too. due to a probable > tcp brea

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2507 14:50], Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >It is not dead card, it is broken TCP, see my similar report in -current, I >notice it several hours ago right after TCP changes was commited. I assume you mean the NewReno commit submitted by Jayanth? -- Jeroen Ruigr

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > -On [2507 14:50], Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >It is not dead card, it is broken TCP, see my similar report in -current, I > >notice it several hours ago right after TCP chang

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp.h tcp_input.c tcp_output.c tcp_timer.c tcp_var.h

2000-05-07 Thread Alain Thivillon
Jonathan Lemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) : > jlemon 2000/05/05 20:31:10 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/netinet tcp.h tcp_input.c tcp_output.c > tcp_timer.c tcp_var.h > Log: > Implement TCP NewReno, as documented in RFC 2582. This allo

Re: TCP becomes very broken just now

2000-05-07 Thread Alain Thivillon
"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) : > Some of recent kernel TCP changes cause TCP completely not working, > i.e. any network daemon (mountd, sendmail, cfsd) started from "rc" on > dialup machine hangs with 3min "Can't connect' timeout and user level > "ppp" started than ha

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone explain to me why pax(1) has (undocumented) switches which > select some tape devices, but apparently randomly numbered ones: Note that these switches appear only in pax' tar compatibility personality, which isn't used in FreeBSD. And the re

Re: Small MAKEDEV bug

2000-05-07 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2506 21:55], Bruce Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >On Sat, 6 May 2000, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> I've just noticed that "sh MAKEDEV acd1" doesn't produce node for acd1 due to >> incorrect comparasion in the "while" loop. This affecting both 4.0-STABLE and >> 5.0-CURRENT. With this messa

Re: TCP becomes very broken just now

2000-05-07 Thread Paul Saab
Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Some of recent kernel TCP changes cause TCP completely not working, > i.e. any network daemon (mountd, sendmail, cfsd) started from "rc" on > dialup machine hangs with 3min "Can't connect' timeout and user level > "ppp" started than hangs forever eve

Re: TCP becomes very broken just now

2000-05-07 Thread Udo Schweigert
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 08:19:23 -0700, Paul Saab wrote: > > I came up with this patch, which fixes my i386 machine.. I dont have an > alpha to test. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~ps/cksum.diff > Fixes it for my machine (i386) too. Thanks Paul! Regards -- Udo Schweigert, Siemens AG | Voi

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, 6 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: # I'm strongly suspecting something wrong with the encoding of the # certificate. Can you grab dumpasn1.c and dumpasn1.cfg from [snip] # Then: # # dumpasn1 file.der root@bonsai(/usr/local/etc/apache/ssl.key)# dumpasn1 server.key 0 2D 45: Unknown (

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:39:16PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > OpenBSD only changed "rmt" to "rst" ("rsa" for us) Just "sa" for us -- "sa" is now a raw device and "rFOO" use is depreciated. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs

Re: Small MAKEDEV bug

2000-05-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:59:46PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > Can we settle this once and for all in a slightly sane manner? > > I committed the change so that MAKEDEV acd1 creates acd1 and not just > acd0. This is wrong. ``MAKEDEV acd2'' should either create only /dev/acd2*,

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Matthew Jacob
Oh, and in the updating of this, don't forget the FreeBSD usage of .ctl for tape devices- as far as I know this is the only *BSD that has this. On Sun, 7 May 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:39:16PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > OpenBSD only changed "rmt" to "rst

Re: rc.d startup scripts

2000-05-07 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2000-05-07, Mike Nowlin écrivait : > stuff that sends SIGHUP to Apache. Gated got it right - add a simple > program (gdc) that does the extra stuff. If we could get the ports Bind has that as well with 'ndc', and apache with apachectl. Such helper scripts are indeed very useful, and it owul

Re: Small MAKEDEV bug

2000-05-07 Thread Jeroen C. van Gelderen
[CC culled, -stable removed] David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:59:46PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > > Can we settle this once and for all in a slightly sane manner? > > > > I committed the change so that MAKEDEV acd1 creates acd1 and not just > > acd0. > > Thi

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
Steve Price wrote: > > On Fri, 5 May 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > # I'm suspecting it might be something missing in the ASN.1 encoding of the > # certificate, which netscape requires but IE permits. This would be > # consistent with a missing openssl.cnf file at the time of certificate > # gen

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Mike Smith
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:15:57PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > > -On [2507 14:50], Andrey A. Chernov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >It is not dead card, it is broken TCP, see my similar report in -current, I > > >notice it several hours ago

Re: ed driver broken in today's -CURRENT?

2000-05-07 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > Since there's a sysctl you can use to turn the former off, perhaps it > would have been smart to take a few seconds to narrow it down? Those changes wouldn't have affected ICMP, but we tried that anyway. The problem was that the code changed the expres

Re: rc.d startup scripts

2000-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
Will Andrews wrote: > > Hello, > > I've noticed an inconsistency among our ports. It seems that not every port > that installs rc.d startup scripts includes methods to not only startup, > but also shutdown and/or restart, where appropriate. (Sent to -ports for > ports hackers' opinions.)

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Mike Smith
> On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 04:39:16PM +0200, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > > OpenBSD only changed "rmt" to "rst" ("rsa" for us) > > Just "sa" for us -- "sa" is now a raw device and "rFOO" use is > depreciated. We had this argument the other day, and you clearly didn't understand. We have three d

LINT broken. (in_cksum changes)

2000-05-07 Thread Nick Hibma
Is it only me that ever compiles LINT? The checksum changes went in a few days ago. Please, people, when you move code around or change a function that is used in more than a fixed set of files, compile LINT. If unsure, compile LINT. It's an extra five minutes, but well worth it. linking kernel

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote: # Ok, here are some silly questions. Did you create a private key for # this server, did you encrypt your cert with it, and is that .key file # pointed to in your httpd.conf config file? SSLCertificateKeyFile is what # you're looking for. http://www.mo

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Steve Price wrote: > # Then: > # > # dumpasn1 file.der > > root@bonsai(/usr/local/etc/apache/ssl.key)# dumpasn1 server.key Nope, this is the .pem-encoded version. You need to decode it to .der using: openssl asn1parse -in server.key -out server.der before running dumpasn1

Re: RSA decrypt problems

2000-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
Steve Price wrote: > > On Sun, 7 May 2000, Doug Barton wrote: > > # Ok, here are some silly questions. Did you create a private key for > # this server, did you encrypt your cert with it, and is that .key file > # pointed to in your httpd.conf config file? SSLCertificateKeyFile is what > #

make release failure during ports

2000-05-07 Thread John W. DeBoskey
fyi... ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-1.2 ===> mail/tkrat2 ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-2.0b9 ===> mail/wanderlust-emacs Error: Bad value of EMACS_PORT_NAME: emacs. Valid values are: Emacs family: emacs19 mule19 emacs20 XEmacs family: xemacs19 xemacs20 xemacs21 x

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 'r' prefix for tape devices is entirely unrelated to the 'r' prefix > for disk devices. I'd like to see some backup for this assertion. Historically, BSD (up to 4.4) used to have mt block device, rewinding nmt block device, non-rewinding

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Mike Smith
> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The 'r' prefix for tape devices is entirely unrelated to the 'r' prefix > > for disk devices. > > I'd like to see some backup for this assertion. Historically, BSD > (up to 4.4) used to have > > mt block device, rewinding >nmt block devic

Re: make release failure during ports

2000-05-07 Thread Otter
"John W. DeBoskey" wrote: > > fyi... > > ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-1.2 > ===> mail/tkrat2 > ===> Creating README.html for tkrat-2.0b9 > ===> mail/wanderlust-emacs > Error: Bad value of EMACS_PORT_NAME: emacs. > Valid values are: > Emacs family: emacs19 mule19 emacs20 >

'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hangs

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
Jordan, I've been experiencing a problem with 'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hanging. Attached is a patch that fixes this problem, cleans the code up a bit (IMHO), and still covers all the corner cases like 'pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/m4-1.1//./..///' like the old code did. :) BTW, it appears pkg_info had a

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 7 May 2000 at 16:48:36 -0700, Mike Smith wrote: >> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The 'r' prefix for tape devices is entirely unrelated to the 'r' prefix >>> for disk devices. >> >> I'd like to see some backup for this assertion. Historically, BSD >> (up to 4.4) used to h

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Greg Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suspect that's an assumption on your part. I think we've come up > with enough man pages to support naddy's statement. Which, btw, was drawn from inspection of MAKEDEV in the various 4.xBSD releases in the CSRG archives (Kirk's CD set). Personally, I ta

Re: gratuituous arp for multiple IP addresses

2000-05-07 Thread Bill Fenner
FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE does the gratuitous ARP when ifconfig'ing an alias: fenestro# ifconfig de1 1.2.3.5 alias 18:35:47.269471 0:40:5:42:d6:de Broadcast arp 42: arp who-has 1.2.3.5 tell 1.2.3.5 FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE also does: mango# ifconfig xl0 135.197.2.250 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias 18:39:12

Re: gratuituous arp for multiple IP addresses

2000-05-07 Thread Rahul Dhesi
By "gratuituous arp" I was really saying "gratuitous arp reply". The machine needs to send a packet of the type arp reply 1.2.3.5 is-at 0:40:5:42:d6:de Rahul On Sun, 7 May 2000, Bill Fenner wrote: > fenestro# ifconfig de1 1.2.3.5 alias > 18:35:47.269471 0:40:5:42:d6:de Broadcast arp 42: ar

'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hangs

2000-05-07 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > I've been experiencing a problem with 'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' > hanging. Attached is a patch that fixes this problem, cleans > the code up a bit (IMHO), and still covers all the corner > cases like 'pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/m4-1.1//./..///' like the > old code did. :) It wouldn't cover the

Re: gratuituous arp for multiple IP addresses

2000-05-07 Thread Bill Fenner
>By "gratuituous arp" I was really saying "gratuitous arp reply". >The machine needs to send a packet of the type > > arp reply 1.2.3.5 is-at 0:40:5:42:d6:de The ARP processing specified in RFC 826 says that if you have an entry for the source IP address you update the hardware address no matt

Re: 'pkg_delete m4-1.1/' hangs

2000-05-07 Thread Steve Price
On Sun, 7 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: # It wouldn't cover the particular obscure case, but this is the sort of It was a pretty bizarre case, but the old code did cover this. Not saying whether I think it to be correct or not but... :) # thing that SUSv2's basename(3) would be appropriate f

Re: gratuituous arp for multiple IP addresses

2000-05-07 Thread Rahul Dhesi
Ok, I stand corrected. Rahul On Sun, 7 May 2000, Bill Fenner wrote: > > >By "gratuituous arp" I was really saying "gratuitous arp reply". > >The machine needs to send a packet of the type > > > > arp reply 1.2.3.5 is-at 0:40:5:42:d6:de > > The ARP processing specified in RFC 826 says that i

proposed pkg_delete change

2000-05-07 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I have a suggestion for pkg_delete: Very often when I'm deleting a package (such as kde, after testing the port) I want to delete that package, and all it's dependancies; instead of going around looking for the dependancies, I think it would be a nice idea to add an option to pkg_delete to automat

Re: Undocumented tape devices in pax(1)

2000-05-07 Thread Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth
The Pyramid series of machines used to have block tape devices, such that one was able to boot a repair kernel and ro root fs off the 1600bpi reel-to-reel deck. Not unaturally, one was discouraged from doing a recursive find on that fs. Stephen (who used to have thoughts of doing the

world breakage in usr.bin/kdump

2000-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
Got the following with up to the minute sources: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/amd/realmounts/slave/usr/current/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/amd/realmounts/slave/usr/current/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. -c /usr/amd/realmounts/slave/usr/current/src/usr.bin/kdump/kdump.c sh /usr/amd/realmounts/slav