On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Count both, nwfs and smbfs, because any program can attempt to
> > create temporary file on these filesystems. File with an invalid file name
> > will be rejected, and this will cost an additional lookup operation(s).
>
> I'm not sure that weird f
Hi!
I can't make installworld for some time with following message:
vm/vm_object.h -> vm/vm_object.ph
vm/vm_page.h -> vm/vm_page.ph
vm/vm_pageout.h -> vm/vm_pageout.ph
vm/vm_pager.h -> vm/vm_pager.ph
vm/vm_param.h -> vm/vm_param.ph
vm/vm_prot.h -> vm/vm_prot.ph
vm/vm_zone.h -> vm/vm_zone.ph
vm/v
With the latest pcm commits, there's a lot of pops and clicks during
the playing of MP3's. This is with the ESS 1868 sound card.
- Donn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> I still suggest not using symbols at all, since I'd like to be able to
> quickly remove tempfiles by hand without worrying if I have to escape #
> or ^, etc.
Then disable globbing first. (csh et al) "set noglob" or (sh et al) "set -f
noglob".
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Would anyone object if I add a ficl word to detect whether we're booting
from a vmware virtual machine? I find it extremely useful when I'm running
FreeBSD as a guest under NT. Because it is a dual cpu box, I can't use a
single kernel to boot both directly or inside the virtual machine. With this
> Would anyone object if I add a ficl word to detect whether we're booting
> from a vmware virtual machine?
Sounds good to me!
--
\\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith
\\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\\ and he'll hate you for a
Mark Murray wrote:
>
> > > What is the purpose of this? It looks hugely wasteful to me. If you
> > > really need a single random bit, it is not good to waste a block of
> > > hard-gained gryptographic randomness; can you not use a pseudo-random
> > > bit-generator?
> >
> > arc4random() does not c
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> Would anyone object if I add a ficl word to detect whether we're booting
> from a vmware virtual machine? I find it extremely useful when I'm running
> FreeBSD as a guest under NT. Because it is a dual cpu box, I can't use a
> single kernel to boot both directly or inside th
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:53:35PM +0400, Hostas Red <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't make installworld for some time with following message:
>
> vm/vm_object.h -> vm/vm_object.ph
> vm/vm_page.h -> vm/vm_page.ph
> vm/vm_pageout.h -> vm/vm_pageout.ph
> vm/vm_pager.h -> vm/vm_pager.ph
> vm/vm_
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> filesystems. For example, should we limit all FreeBSD file names to 8.3
> single-case in case someone wants to run from an old-style MSDOS
> partition?
Bad example. Not _all_ filenames but temp. ones only which allows to run
FreeBS
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hosta
s Red writes:
>I can't make installworld for some time with following message:
>
>vm/vm_object.h -> vm/vm_object.ph
>vm/vm_page.h -> vm/vm_page.ph
>vm/vm_pageout.h -> vm/vm_pageout.ph
>vm/vm_pager.h -> vm/vm_pager.ph
>vm/vm_param.h -> vm/vm_param.ph
>vm/vm_pro
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > filesystems. For example, should we limit all FreeBSD file names to 8.3
> > single-case in case someone wants to run from an old-style MSDOS
> > partition?
>
> Bad example. Not _all_
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The point is the same. Files created by FreeBSD binaries during the course
> of operation don't conform to an 8.3 monocase naming scheme (think of
> dotfiles for example). I don't believe there's such a thing as a lowest
> common denominator of file syst
> > But I repeat myself; are you still intending to use cryptographic security
> > for one bit? What does that buy you? An attacker will laugh at the waste
> > of resources that went into a coin-flip :-). Much better is to use something
> > cheaper like time-of-day XOR 1 << whatever.
>
> Pseudo r
Greetings,
What is the quick way to restore the boot manager (dual os). Lost it when I
reloaded Win98.
Have 4.0 CD, machine running 5.0-current.
John Hengstler
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:14:35PM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> I'm not sure it is a good idea to name this variable VMWare as
> that is implementation specific. It may be better to have a var
> named 'emulation' set to 'none' or 'vmware' or 'bochs' or ...
Mmm.. or, giving forth the abi
> > extern void ficlOutb(FICL_VM *pVM);
> > extern void ficlInb(FICL_VM *pVM);
I'm an idiot.
--
Christopher Masto Senior Network Monkey NetMonger Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.netmonger.net
Free yourself, free your machine, free the d
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> With the latest pcm commits, there's a lot of pops and clicks during
> the playing of MP3's. This is with the ESS 1868 sound card.
>
> - Donn
>
I hate to send "me too" emails, but i think it's the driver. My SB
Live has worked great until last night, when i caught my sou
Christopher Masto wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:14:35PM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> > I'm not sure it is a good idea to name this variable VMWare as
> > that is implementation specific. It may be better to have a var
> > named 'emulation' set to 'none' or 'vmware' or 'bochs' or ..
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 12:58:27PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Bad example. Not _all_ filenames but temp. ones only which allows to run
> > FreeBSD binary in MSDOS FS with MSDOS files.
>
> The point is the same. Files created by FreeBSD binaries during the course
> of operation don't conform
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 10:02:44PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > > But I repeat myself; are you still intending to use cryptographic security
> > > for one bit? What does that buy you? An attacker will laugh at the waste
> > > of resources that went into a coin-flip :-). Much better is to use some
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 10:02:44PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > > > But I repeat myself; are you still intending to use cryptographic security
> > > > for one bit? What does that buy you? An attacker will laugh at the waste
> > > > of resources that went into a coi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > filesystems. For example, should we limit all FreeBSD file names to 8.3
> > > single-case in case someone wants to run from an old-style MSDOS
> > > pa
Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> Christopher Masto wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 01:14:35PM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> > > I'm not sure it is a good idea to name this variable VMWare as
> > > that is implementation specific. It may be better to have a var
> > > named 'emulation' set to 'non
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Jacob A. Hart wrote:
> I remember the scheduler bug you're talking about. My system feels much
> the same as it did during 4.0-CURRENT when that bug was active. I had a
> collection of wrapper scripts for CPU intensive programs that suspended
> rc5des, ran the program, then
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Matthew Thyer wrote:
>Are you using power management (presumably so you can poweroff your
>ATX system) ?
>
>You must not use APM with an SMP kernel currently.
>
>Remove the lines in your /etc/rc.conf that read:
>
>apm_enable="YES"
>apmd_enable="YES"
>
>(Or change them to ="NO
Just one more report to add to the ps2 mouse discussion:
Today I moved from 4.0 to -CURRENT. Now my mouse jumps around like
other people are reporting. It worked fine before.
I tried using a different mouse. I tried using NOCHECKSYNC (even
though I'm not getting the messages). I tried this both w
Luoqi Chen wrote:
>
> Would anyone object if I add a ficl word to detect whether we're booting
> from a vmware virtual machine? I find it extremely useful when I'm running
> FreeBSD as a guest under NT. Because it is a dual cpu box, I can't use a
> single kernel to boot both directly or inside th
Hi!
Please excuse me, this is my first time posting
a question. I know you people are only answering
out of courtesy, and I appreciate any replies I may get.
I was using FreeBSD 4.0 successfully with
IPFW and Sound enabled.
Recently I upgraded to 5.0 snapshot 2000/05/20
and my kernel now uses /
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> dotfiles for example). I don't believe there's such a thing as a lowest
> common denominator of file system naming conventions - either a filesystem
> can support UFS names (perhaps through a translation later) or it's not
> suitable for running FreeBSD
Okay, answering my own question for the sake of the archive, I believe it
was an on combination of some of the options SC_something that
vidcontrol -m on and my mouse and kernel didnt like. I was using some to
save on kernel size and memory used but then decided to start using the
computer on
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:37:09PM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> > Why to XOR true random bits from arc4random() with non-random bits from
> > getpid()? It only weakens. Better way is just remove any getpid() code and
> > left arc4random() only.
>
> Then you will get collisions which you
>Okay, answering my own question for the sake of the archive, I believe it
>was an on combination of some of the options SC_something that
>vidcontrol -m on and my mouse and kernel didnt like. I was using some to
>save on kernel size and memory used but then decided to start using the
>compu
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 11:23:58PM -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 07:37:09PM -0400, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> > > Why to XOR true random bits from arc4random() with non-random bits from
> > > getpid()? It only weakens. Better way is just remove any getpid() code an
I dont recall exactly :( SC_NO_FONT_LOADING was one of them, I may have
commented one of the others in the old conf trying to fix it. I have a
spare comp with a freebsd install I could play around with it on and see
if I can recreate it instead of goofing around with my server that had the
proble
On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 11:23:58PM -0700, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > would be the way to go: 64^6 = 2^36 possibilities which is nice...
>
> 1) Just totally opposite: mixing random with non-random sources you'll get
> into collision much faster then with random source only. 2) Yet, of course,
:1) Just totally opposite: mixing random with non-random sources you'll get
:into collision much faster then with random source only. 2) Yet, of course,
:the code handles collisions.
:
:--
:Andrey A. Chernov
:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Think about it. If you mix a random number with a non-rando
37 matches
Mail list logo
