Problem with tun device and trafshow/tcpdump?

Hi everyone. Ok apologies first to anyone who has been asked this question before, I've searched the mail lists and cannot find anything like this recently. The problem is when using user ppp and some kind of traffic monitor program like trafshow or tcpdump. There are three problems I've

Re: Loss of fetch(1) functionality with libfetch

Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whilst the environment is somewhat safer than the command line, I'd still prefer not to have passwords embedded in environment variables. Since ps(1) no longer allows users to view other users' processes' environment, I don't think it's a very big issue

Re: Latest kernel won't boot

Just recently build a kernel from cvsup, and the kernel won't boot. It gets to the point where you see booting [kernel] \ And it just hangs right there. There's a lot of disk activity, and after about 2 minutes (and no boot messages), I see a login prompt, but the machine is froze.

Re: Latest kernel won't boot

Sorry for the last try, not enough caffiene yet... Anyway, I had this problem as well. The problem was that /boot/loader wasn't working properly. Without it, the system runs, but you can't talk to the console. You can either boot from fixit cdrom and install a new /boot/loader or, as I did,

Re: Latest kernel won't boot

On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Michael Lucas wrote: Sorry for the last try, not enough caffiene yet... Anyway, I had this problem as well. The problem was that /boot/loader wasn't working properly. Without it, the system runs, but you can't talk to the console. It seems like the problem was with

ntpdate bug(?)

Hi, I posted something similar on -questions but had no reponse. Could someone tell me if this is a bug? Ntpdate won't set the date when the current date is ahead but will set the date when it's behind. I've noticed this on 4.1 and -current from this past weekend. (I'm not talking about

Re: ATA66 support

On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems j mckitrick wrote: A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work? ATA66 has been working for quite some time now.

Re: ATA66 support

It seems Andreas Klemm wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems j mckitrick wrote: A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work? ATA66 has

Re: ATA66 support

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:56:55PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Andreas Klemm wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: I can confirm, that for example the Tyan Titan Pro has chipsets builtin that doesn't grok ATA66. Ehm, you mean because the HW

Re: ATA66 support

It seems Andreas Klemm wrote: I bought a separate ATA PCI controller which is capable of ATA 66. But using an ATA-66 capable cable causes the system to hang during boot. Strange.. atapci0: Intel PIIX3 ATA controller at device 7.1 on pci0 atapci0: Busmastering DMA not enabled Funny, what

Re: ATA66 support

On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:44:57PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: ad4: 39082MB Maxtor 54098U8 [79406/16/63] at ata2-master using UDMA33 AHA! try swap that with a known good drive (ie non Maxtor/WD) if you can Too bad... have to live with that now ;-) -- Andreas Klemm Songs from our

$B$B8=6b(B 10$@$BK|1_!*%W%l%9%F#2!*9k2Z>^IJ$,Ev$?(B$@$B$k!*(B

$B8=6b(B10$BK|1_!*%W%l%9%F#2!*9k2Z>^IJ$,Ev$?$k!*(B $B!y8=6b(B10$BK|1_!*%W%l%9%F#2!*9k2Z>^IJ$,Ev$?$k!*!y(B $B!!!A!!(BIndex-TV$B;kD0R2p$$$?$@$$$?J}$K=P$5$;$F$$$?$@$$$F$*$j$^(B

Re: Loss of fetch(1) functionality with libfetch

On 3 Aug 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Whilst the environment is somewhat safer than the command line, I'd still prefer not to have passwords embedded in environment variables. Since ps(1) no longer allows users to view other users' processes'

Re: Request for review (LPDEST vs PRINTER)

On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 09:35:23PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: The other printing-system alternative is LPRng (which people can install from ports). LPRng does add the 'lpstat' command, in addition to replacing lpr/lpq/lprm. And if I am reading this code right, it does check LPDEST for