On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:53:50PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
Does this capability really need to exist (e.g., supporting many files)? It
would seem like the additional complexity would be not what you want for what's
essentially a security policy mechansim. Who gets to own these
Vadim Belman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:53:50PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
It doesn't seem unreasonable to have a single file with a list of allowable
shells.
It does if you think of mergemaster, for example. With any upgrade
it consider /etc/shells as
Config now removes almost all headers:
Removing stale header: apm.h
Removing stale header: opt_userconfig.h
Removing stale header: opt_syscons.h
Removing stale header: opt_cpu.h
Removing stale header: opt_clock.h
...
make: don't know how to make opt_global.h(continuing)
make: don't know how to
Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
} On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:28:03PM -0600, Patrick Hartling wrote:
}
} ldd was telling me that it had both libc.so.3 and libc.so.5 which seemed
} very bad to me. When I recomipled LyX to see if that would fix things,
} I noticed that ld was giving a
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:19:34PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 29-Jan-01 John Indra wrote:
2. If something change to the source tree's MAKEDEV, what should I do?
Nothing. With DEVFS, each driver in the kernel creates its own
entries automatically, so MAKEDEV isn't used.
Hrm... what
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Ames writes:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:19:34PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 29-Jan-01 John Indra wrote:
2. If something change to the source tree's MAKEDEV, what should I do?
Nothing. With DEVFS, each driver in the kernel creates its own
entries
Bruce Evans wrote:
Config now removes almost all headers:
Removing stale header: apm.h
Removing stale header: opt_userconfig.h
Removing stale header: opt_syscons.h
Removing stale header: opt_cpu.h
Removing stale header: opt_clock.h
...
make: don't know how to make
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
Config now removes almost all headers:
...
This is starting from compile directory populated by a previous version
of config. Starting from scratch, config seems to work for the first
run. The second run complains about all
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
Config now removes almost all headers:
...
This is starting from compile directory populated by a previous version
of config. Starting from scratch, config seems to work for the first
run. The
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:02:27 -0600, "Jacques A. Vidrine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I would rather that a separate configuration file be read, for example,
with a list of shells(5) format files to consult.
I would rather have a single file, located in a directory intended for
configuration
*groan* I'm having trouble believing that *config* of all things is now
dependent on time to avoid bugs... This is *one* for the books
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
Config now removes almost
Title: 8
You are invited to become a VIP member
of www.eVIPlist.com, the Robb
Report of urban events. Where membership certainly has it's
privileges. This exclusive list is opt-in only and you
will not
libc_r won't compile since changes made last night.
(libc_r)504}make
cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../libc/include
-DPTHREAD_KERNEL -D_THREAD_SAFE -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread
-I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../../include -D_LOCK_DEBUG -D_PTHREADS_INVARIANTS -c
Matthew Jacob wrote:
*groan* I'm having trouble believing that *config* of all things is now
dependent on time to avoid bugs... This is *one* for the books
Yep. That's why I disabled it and will replace it with something more
robust. In hindsight it was Not A Good Thing.
On Mon, 29
Just reporting
farrago.feral.com root vinum
mkdir: /dev/vinum: Operation not supported
mkdir: /dev/vinum: Operation not supported
mkdir: /dev/vinum: Operation not supported
mkdir: /dev/vinum: Operation not supported
an't create /dev/vinum/Control: No such file or directory
Can't create
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Manfred Antar wrote:
libc_r won't compile since changes made last night.
(libc_r)504}make
cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../libc/include
-DPTHREAD_KERNEL -D_THREAD_SAFE -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread
-I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../../include
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:31:32 -0500 (EST)
Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GW I would rather have a single file, located in a directory intended for
GW configuration files. Perhaps we could call it ``/etc/shells'' which
GW seems to be popular.
As you wish. I have no axe to
At 02:02 PM 1/29/2001 -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Manfred Antar wrote:
libc_r won't compile since changes made last night.
(libc_r)504}make
cc -O -pipe -DLIBC_RCS -DSYSLIBC_RCS -I/usr/src/lib/libc_r/../libc/include
-DPTHREAD_KERNEL -D_THREAD_SAFE
How can I use Ctm_rmail on mail downloaded using netscape, i f it is not
possible how can I retrive sources from mail?
Please answer on mi personal mail to.
Rasa
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Monday, 29 January 2001 at 16:10:24 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Ames writes:
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:19:34PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 29-Jan-01 John Indra wrote:
2. If something change to the source tree's MAKEDEV, what should I do?
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
You can create symlinks in /dev, you cannot mknod there.
What is the reason for this? How does a program or script know
whether the system is running DEVFS or not?
I don't see any good reason why this can't be supported. We may
talk about
At 29 Jan 2001 11:49:36 +0100,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Mergemaster doesn't care about the contents of the file, only
about its $FreeBSD$ tag. As long as this stays the same, it'll leave
the file alone. If you remove the $FreeBSD$ tag in the installed file
or someone
On Tuesday, 30 January 2001 at 8:37:56 +0600, Boris Popov wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
You can create symlinks in /dev, you cannot mknod there.
What is the reason for this? How does a program or script know
whether the system is running DEVFS or not?
I don't see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
At 29 Jan 2001 11:49:36 +0100,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. Mergemaster doesn't care about the contents of the file, only
about its $FreeBSD$ tag. As long as this stays the same, it'll leave
the file alone. If you remove the $FreeBSD$ tag in
Mike Meyer stated:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
: At 29 Jan 2001 11:49:36 +0100,
: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: No. Mergemaster doesn't care about the contents of the file, only
: about its $FreeBSD$ tag. As long as this stays the same, it'll leave
: the file alone. If you
Hi...
Forgive me if I'm being such a nuisance. I wish I can help but I don't have
the strength to :(
I have seen many responses that prove that there is something WRONG with agp
support both in -CURRENT and -STABLE if used against XFree86 4.0.2. Here is
another one:
- Forwarded message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
You can create symlinks in /dev, you cannot mknod there.
What is the reason for this? How does a program or script know
whether the system is running DEVFS or not?
The reson for not creating device nodes is that you don't have
all the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Boris Popov
writes:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
You can create symlinks in /dev, you cannot mknod there.
What is the reason for this? How does a program or script know
whether the system is running DEVFS or not?
I don't see any good reason
Boris Popov wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
You can create symlinks in /dev, you cannot mknod there.
What is the reason for this? How does a program or script know
whether the system is running DEVFS or not?
I don't see any good reason why this can't be
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2001 at 8:37:56 +0600, Boris Popov wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Greg Lehey wrote:
You can create symlinks in /dev, you cannot mknod there.
What is the reason for this? How does a program or script know
whether the system is running DEVFS or
Thank god other people are having trouble with XFree86 4.0.2 and the
i810 chipset, I was beginning to think I was going crazy. Even the guys
in #freebsd (irc.openprojects.net) think I'm an idiot because I can't
get it working =)
The problem is actually worse than a simple lockup. The server
In reply to my own post (which nobody has replied to, perhaps
because I never actually phrased a question :-) )... I have found
that if the kernel config file is named GENERIC, it will boot
just fine; otherwise, I loose the console. I have done a
cvsup tonight as well as a make world and many
32 matches
Mail list logo
